Minimal Fix for #4247 - Enforce name unicity in ModeObjects by adding \required-field to name#4248
Merged
Minimal Fix for #4247 - Enforce name unicity in ModeObjects by adding \required-field to name#4248
Conversation
…aren't even wrapped though)
…had to add \required-field on name, so I chose to upgrade the IDD) Now would be a good time to wrap these objects...
…'Name' field except Output:Meter cf #4247 (comment) for script used and objects names
Contributor
|
I tested the Ubuntu 18.04 build above and confirmed that it fixes the issue. Thanks @jmarrec! |
Collaborator
|
CI Results for 9b2dc86:
|
Collaborator
|
looks great! Windows CI (as usual) was struggling a bit here so just replaying the build and to verify and will merge once done. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request overview
Minimal Fix #4247 - Enforce name unicity in ModeObjects by adding \required-field to name
Note: Since I needed to do that for the
UtilityCost:XXXwhich are present in our IDD though they aren't wrapped in the SDK, I aligned the IDDs with the E+ IDD and made some modifications like adding\required-fieldwhere it made sense. I would say now would be a good time to actually wrap these objects.Pull Request Author
Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.
src/model/test)src/energyplus/Test)src/osversion/VersionTranslator.cpp)src/openstudio_lib/library/OpenStudioPolicy.xml)Labels:
IDDChangeAPIChangePull Request - Ready for CIso that CI builds your PRReview Checklist
This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.