Skip to content

docs: add maintainer runbook for evidence-backed recipe PRs#972

Merged
mchmarny merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
njhensley:docs/recipe-contribution-workflow
May 19, 2026
Merged

docs: add maintainer runbook for evidence-backed recipe PRs#972
mchmarny merged 2 commits into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
njhensley:docs/recipe-contribution-workflow

Conversation

@njhensley

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Adds a maintainer-facing runbook for reviewing recipe contributions backed by ADR-007 evidence bundles, and trims ADR-007 to defer tarball input form to V2.

Motivation / Context

Maintainers cannot independently re-run a contributor's validator on hardware they don't have. ADR-007 specifies the trust artifact (signed evidence bundle) that lets a maintainer accept a recipe they cannot reproduce, but until now there was no maintainer-side runbook describing how to review such PRs in practice. This adds that page and wires it into the integrator guide and docs nav.

ADR-007 is also tightened: the V1 verifier input forms are pointer / OCI / unpacked directory. Tarballs are deferred to V2 (contributors can unpack and verify via the directory path in the meantime), keeping the V1 surface minimal.

Fixes: N/A
Related: ADR-007

Type of Change

  • Documentation update

Component(s) Affected

  • Docs/examples (docs/, examples/)

Implementation Notes

  • New page docs/contributor/maintaining.md covers: review checklist for PRs touching recipes/**, signer-identity trust patterns, exit-1 review process, and pointers back to ADR-007 for the bundle format.
  • Linked from docs/integrator/recipe-development.md and registered in docs/index.yml nav.
  • ADR-007 edits remove the tarball auto-detect case from the V1 verifier description and add a "V1 does not ship" row explaining the deferral.

Testing

Docs-only change. make qualify not strictly required for prose, but lychee anchor checks on docs/** will run in CI on push.

Risk Assessment

  • Low — Docs-only, no code paths touched.

Rollout notes: N/A

Checklist

  • Tests pass locally (make test with -race) — N/A, docs-only
  • Linter passes (make lint) — N/A, docs-only
  • I did not skip/disable tests to make CI green
  • I added/updated tests for new functionality — N/A
  • I updated docs if user-facing behavior changed
  • Changes follow existing patterns in the codebase
  • Commits are cryptographically signed (git commit -S)

Adds docs/contributor/maintaining.md as the maintainer-side view of
the recipe-evidence flow described in ADR-007, links it from the
integrator recipe-development guide, and registers it in the docs
nav. ADR-007 is updated to defer the tarball input form for
`aicr evidence verify` to V2 (pointer / OCI / unpacked directory
ship in V1; tarballs unpack-and-verify via the directory path).
@njhensley njhensley requested a review from a team as a code owner May 19, 2026 16:46
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: e483978e-e7d3-4c8d-aab2-c0615a9df078

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 40cd895 and 7f55378.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/index.yml
  • docs/integrator/recipe-development.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR adds docs: a new maintainer runbook (docs/contributor/maintaining.md) describing reviewer checklists, signer-identity treatment, Exit-1 process, evidence/exempt policy, and a 6-month audit runbook; it refines ADR-007 to remove tarball auto-detection from V1 aicr evidence verify inputs (leaving pointer, OCI ref, and unpacked directory); and it updates docs navigation and integrator guidance to link the new runbook.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Suggested labels

documentation, size/M

Suggested reviewers

  • lalitadithya
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding a maintainer runbook for reviewing evidence-backed recipe PRs.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the motivation, implementation, and scope of the documentation additions and ADR-007 updates.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/integrator/recipe-development.md`:
- Around line 527-529: Replace the unclear opening sentence in the "Submitting
Your Recipe" section that currently begins with "Recipes that target hardware
AICR maintainers cannot independently re-run require an evidence bundle..." with
a concise, unambiguous sentence such as: "If a recipe targets hardware only
accessible to AICR maintainers, contributors must attach an evidence bundle so
reviewers can verify the recipe without owning the hardware." Update the
sentence in that section (look for the existing fragment about recipes targeting
hardware AICR maintainers) to use this clearer wording and ensure surrounding
sentences flow grammatically.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 57fc3cb8-6d7d-46c4-b9e3-d6cd9430f907

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cc08600 and 40cd895.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/contributor/maintaining.md
  • docs/design/007-recipe-evidence.md
  • docs/index.yml
  • docs/integrator/recipe-development.md

Comment thread docs/integrator/recipe-development.md
@mchmarny mchmarny merged commit f2419b4 into NVIDIA:main May 19, 2026
32 checks passed
@njhensley njhensley deleted the docs/recipe-contribution-workflow branch June 23, 2026 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants