Skip to content

Set the temporary value for diffusion coefficient#846

Merged
boulderdaze merged 2 commits intomainfrom
remove_diffusion_coefficient_from_species_requirement
Sep 22, 2025
Merged

Set the temporary value for diffusion coefficient#846
boulderdaze merged 2 commits intomainfrom
remove_diffusion_coefficient_from_species_requirement

Conversation

@boulderdaze
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@boulderdaze boulderdaze commented Sep 20, 2025

This PR adds temporary workaround to read diffusion coefficients.
Some tests use manually created species with specified diffusion coefficients, which led to test failures. This will be addressed in the following issue.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 16.66667% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 94.53%. Comparing base (6e4a93a) to head (345a506).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...cm/process/rate_constant/surface_rate_constant.hpp 16.66% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #846      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.65%   94.53%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        3946     3951       +5     
==========================================
  Hits         3735     3735              
- Misses        211      216       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@boulderdaze boulderdaze marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2025 18:54
@boulderdaze boulderdaze self-assigned this Sep 22, 2025
@boulderdaze boulderdaze merged commit 9f773c8 into main Sep 22, 2025
26 checks passed
@boulderdaze boulderdaze deleted the remove_diffusion_coefficient_from_species_requirement branch September 22, 2025 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants