Skip to content

Conversation

@JakeQZ
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeQZ JakeQZ commented Dec 4, 2025

Also internally avoid comparison with ==.

Resolves #1330

@JakeQZ JakeQZ self-assigned this Dec 4, 2025
@JakeQZ JakeQZ added cleanup refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality labels Dec 4, 2025
@JakeQZ JakeQZ marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2025 01:13
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 4, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 62.706% (+0.2%) from 62.487%
when pulling 52cd175 on task/remove-remove-declaration-block-loose
into 51a3c0a on main.

Also internally avoid comparison with `==`.

Resolves #1330
@JakeQZ JakeQZ changed the title [TASK] Lose loose comparison in removeDeclarationBlockBySelector [BUGFIX] Allow order-insensitve removeDeclarationBlockBySelector Dec 4, 2025
@JakeQZ JakeQZ marked this pull request as ready for review December 4, 2025 12:32
@JakeQZ JakeQZ force-pushed the task/remove-remove-declaration-block-loose branch from 41605d1 to 52cd175 Compare December 4, 2025 16:08
@JakeQZ JakeQZ requested a review from oliverklee December 4, 2025 16:11
Copy link
Collaborator

@oliverklee oliverklee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@oliverklee oliverklee merged commit dc99bbd into main Dec 4, 2025
23 checks passed
@oliverklee oliverklee deleted the task/remove-remove-declaration-block-loose branch December 4, 2025 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cleanup refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resolve loose comparison in removeDeclarationBlockBySelector()

4 participants