Conversation
WalkthroughA new script for updating the Electron version in project files was added, along with a corresponding npm script entry. The Electron component readiness logic was refactored, introducing a utility function to handle the Widevine-specific Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Browser as browser.ts
participant ComponentsUtil as electron-components.ts
participant Electron as electron (dynamic import)
Browser->>ComponentsUtil: waitForElectronComponentsToBeReady()
ComponentsUtil->>Electron: dynamic import
alt Electron has components
ComponentsUtil->>Electron: components.whenReady()
Electron-->>ComponentsUtil: resolves/rejects
ComponentsUtil-->>Browser: true (if resolved) / false (if rejected)
else Electron has no components
ComponentsUtil-->>Browser: false
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
scripts/use-stock-electron.ts (1)
38-38: Consider making the Electron version configurable.The hardcoded version "35.3.0" limits flexibility. Consider accepting the version as a command-line argument or environment variable.
-const electronVersion = "35.3.0"; +const electronVersion = process.argv[2] || process.env.ELECTRON_VERSION || "35.3.0";src/main/modules/electron-components.ts (1)
1-15: Good abstraction for handling Electron variants.The function provides a clean way to handle differences between stock and Widevine Electron. The dynamic import and property checking approach is solid.
Consider a few minor improvements:
export async function waitForElectronComponentsToBeReady() { - const electron = await import("electron"); + try { + const electron = await import("electron"); - if ("components" in electron) { + if ("components" in electron) { const { components } = electron; // @ts-ignore: This is defined in Widevine Electron, but not in the stock Electron return components .whenReady() .then(() => true) .catch(() => false); - } + } - return Promise.resolve(false); + return false; + } catch (error) { + console.warn("Failed to import electron module:", error); + return false; + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
package.json(1 hunks)scripts/use-stock-electron.ts(1 hunks)src/main/browser/browser.ts(3 hunks)src/main/modules/electron-components.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/main/browser/browser.ts (1)
src/main/modules/electron-components.ts (1)
waitForElectronComponentsToBeReady(1-15)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
scripts/use-stock-electron.ts (1)
65-67:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify the bun.lock array manipulation logic.
The array manipulation operations appear complex and might not work as intended. The
splice(1, 0, "")inserts an empty string at index 1, and setting index 3 assumes the array has at least 4 elements.Please verify this logic with actual bun.lock file structure. The operations might cause array corruption if the assumptions about array length are incorrect.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the structure of electron entry in bun.lock to verify array manipulation logic # Search for electron package structure in bun.lock if [ -f "bun.lock" ]; then echo "Current bun.lock electron structure:" rg -A 10 '"electron"' bun.lock || echo "No electron entry found" else echo "bun.lock file not found" fiLength of output: 4951
bun.lock “electron” entry patch is correct
Verified that thepackages["electron"]entry in bun.lock is a 3-element array—[specifier, metadata object, hash]. AfterbunLock.packages.electron.splice(1, 0, "")it becomes 4 elements, so assigning to index 3 is valid and aligns with the pattern used by other packages (specifier, "", metadata, "").
package.json (1)
27-28: LGTM! Script integration looks good.The new npm script properly integrates the TypeScript script using Bun runtime. The trailing comma addition is also a good formatting improvement.
src/main/browser/browser.ts (2)
3-3: Good refactoring for cleaner imports.Removing the direct
componentsimport and using the utility function improves maintainability and centralizes the Electron variant handling logic.Also applies to: 13-13
94-97: Improved readiness check logic.The simplified boolean-based approach is much cleaner than the previous promise chaining. The warning message provides good debugging information.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit