Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 516e9ee and cb627fa.

• bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

• .github/workflows/build-and-release.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/electron-updater.yml (1 hunks)
• docs/contributing/updating-electron.md (1 hunks)
• package.json (3 hunks)
• scripts/electron-upgrader/beta.ts (1 hunks)
• scripts/electron-upgrader/github.ts (1 hunks)
• scripts/electron-upgrader/stable.ts (1 hunks)
• scripts/electron-upgrader/updater.ts (1 hunks)

package.json (2)

28-30: LGTM! Script organization looks good.

The script renaming with the script: prefix provides clear organization, and the new automation scripts align well with the PR objectives for automated Electron upgrading.

---

76-76:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify jju package version and security.

The jju package is used for JSON parsing while preserving formatting, which is appropriate for this use case. Please verify the package version is current and has no known security vulnerabilities.

Also applies to: 93-93

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check jju package for latest version and security advisories

# Check latest version on npm
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/jju/latest | jq '.version'

# Check for security advisories  
npm audit --audit-level=moderate --package-lock-only --json | jq '.vulnerabilities | keys'

Length of output: 561

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify presence and versions of jju and @types/jju in package.json
jq -r '[
  {name: "dependencies.jju", value: (.dependencies.jju // .devDependencies.jju // "not found")},
  {name: "devDependencies.@types/jju", value: (.devDependencies["@types/jju"] // "not found")}
] | .[] | "\(.name): \(.value)"' package.json

Length of output: 308

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Generate a lockfile and re-run audit to check for any vulnerabilities
npm install --package-lock-only
npm audit --audit-level=moderate --json | jq '.vulnerabilities | keys'

Length of output: 683

---

Validate jju dependency version and security

The jju package in your package.json is pinned to ^1.4.0, which matches the latest published release. The accompanying type definitions are at ^1.4.5. No known security advisories for jju appear in the public npm registry, but since our audit in the sandbox couldn’t run without a lockfile, please:

• Ensure your project has a valid package-lock.json (or npm-shrinkwrap.json)
• Run npm audit --audit-level=moderate locally to confirm there are no moderate-or-above vulnerabilities

Locations to check:
• package.json – dependencies.jju: ^1.4.0
• package.json – devDependencies.@types/jju: ^1.4.5

scripts/electron-upgrader/github.ts (3)

1-14: LGTM! Well-organized constants.

The constants are clearly defined and provide good configuration for the Electron version management system.

---

16-49: LGTM! Proper TypeScript interfaces.

The GitHub API response interfaces are well-typed and include appropriate documentation. This provides good type safety for API interactions.

---

77-80: LGTM! Robust version parsing.

The regex-based major version extraction is correct and handles edge cases by returning null on parse failure.

docs/contributing/updating-electron.md (1)

5-5: LGTM! Good clarification.

The header change to "Updating Electron Manually" clearly distinguishes the manual process from the new automated upgrade workflows being introduced.

.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

59-59: LGTM! Consistent with package.json updates.

The script name update aligns with the renaming in package.json and maintains the same functionality.

.github/workflows/build-and-release.yml (1)

40-40: LGTM: Script name updated for consistency.

The script name change aligns with the new naming convention established in package.json.

scripts/electron-upgrader/beta.ts (1)

1-29: LGTM: Well-structured Electron beta upgrader script.

The implementation follows a clear workflow with proper error handling and informative logging. The separation of concerns between GitHub API interaction and file updates is well designed.

scripts/electron-upgrader/stable.ts (1)

1-29: LGTM: Consistent implementation following established pattern.

The stable upgrader script mirrors the beta script's structure, ensuring consistency across the upgrade automation system. Error handling and logging are appropriately implemented.

.github/workflows/electron-updater.yml (1)

25-28:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Verify Node.js version compatibility.

The setup-node step pins node-version: 22, which isn't an official LTS release. Confirm that actions/setup-node@v4 supports installing Node 22 or switch to a currently supported LTS (e.g., 18 or 20) to avoid workflow failures.

---

🌐 Web query:

Does GitHub Actions actions/setup-node@v4 support Node.js version 22?

💡 Result:

As of June 2025, GitHub Actions' actions/setup-node@v4 supports Node.js version 22. This action allows you to set up your GitHub Actions workflow with a specific version of Node.js, including the latest releases. (github.com)

To use Node.js version 22 in your workflow, you can specify it in the node-version input:

- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
  with:
    node-version: '22'

This configuration will install the latest available version of Node.js 22. For more detailed usage and options, refer to the setup-node documentation.

Citations:

• 1: https://github.com/actions/setup-node?utm_source=openai

---

✅ Node.js v22 support validated

The actions/setup-node@v4 action does support installing Node.js version 22, so the existing configuration is valid and no changes are needed.