Summary
has useful core primitives already, but the repo currently does not have visible test coverage or CI around the backend and utility layer. That makes it harder to trust future changes as the package grows.
Why this matters
For a low-level library, reliability matters as much as feature count. Tests and CI would make the repo safer to extend with new backends and retrieval utilities.
Proposed scope
- add unit tests for , token helpers, truncation, and similarity utilities
- add backend tests for CRUD behavior and ordering
- add a basic CI workflow that runs tests on supported Python versions
- document local test commands in the README or CONTRIBUTING section
Acceptance criteria
- the core utility and backend surface has regression coverage
- CI runs automatically on push and pull request
- contributor docs show how to run the test suite locally
Notes
This is a strong foundation issue that will make later feature work much easier to ship confidently.
Summary
has useful core primitives already, but the repo currently does not have visible test coverage or CI around the backend and utility layer. That makes it harder to trust future changes as the package grows.
Why this matters
For a low-level library, reliability matters as much as feature count. Tests and CI would make the repo safer to extend with new backends and retrieval utilities.
Proposed scope
Acceptance criteria
Notes
This is a strong foundation issue that will make later feature work much easier to ship confidently.