Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.56%. Comparing base (28bc599) to head (df50831).
Report is 395 commits behind head on dev.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #9558      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.82%   90.56%   +0.73%     
==========================================
  Files         412      406       -6     
  Lines       11878    12725     +847     
  Branches     2364     2465     +101     
==========================================
+ Hits        10670    11525     +855     
+ Misses        681      639      -42     
- Partials      527      561      +34     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

I would think that the uid was probably implemented because of the last checkbox in this issue: #6555

It was just never finished.

Just a quick question, on why did we remove the prefixes like mudnavmenu or snackbar

Just a quick question, on why did we remove the prefixes like mudnavmenu or snackbar

For me, this is only a generated ID and there was no benefit for me keeping the prefix. In addition, this was inconsistently used, so I guess this was only used to prevent invalid characters as the first letter.

Just a quick question, on why did we remove the prefixes like mudnavmenu or snackbar

For me, this is only a generated ID and there was no benefit for me keeping the prefix. In addition, this was inconsistently used, so I guess this was only used to prevent invalid characters as the first letter.

Ok, I'm just hoping that nobody used this for Selenium testing etc.

Ok, I'm just hoping that nobody used this for Selenium testing etc.

If something occurs, please mention me. Generated IDs shouldn't be used as a selector.
I was also thinking about supporting data-testid in MudBlazor. E.g., Playwright has a dedicated method for this. But this would require some configuration. I, personally, don't want such IDs in production.