Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.65%. Comparing base (28bc599) to head (70eeee1).
Report is 244 commits behind head on dev.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #9088      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.82%   90.65%   +0.82%     
==========================================
  Files         412      398      -14     
  Lines       11878    12382     +504     
  Branches     2364     2406      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        10670    11225     +555     
+ Misses        681      620      -61     
- Partials      527      537      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This looks to me like Hiliter was an intentional misspelling. The items added to RegisterAliases are meant to be aliases with their results indicating Go to xxx as a way to redirect the user when they searched for a component via known synonym, for example

The comment in the method states

// Add search texts here which users might search and direct them to the correct component or page.

If Hiliter was changed to maybe Hilighter or some other misspelling, that may be more appropriate.
Alternatively, removing it completely or of course leaving it as is are options.

I'd vote for removal since Hiliter correctly returns Highlighter ... eliminating the need for a redirect.

Yes we can remove it. Our search is now fuzzy so it will still be found if someone types Hiliter

Thanks