Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #8880 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.82% 90.18% +0.35%
==========================================
Files 412 423 +11
Lines 11878 12275 +397
Branches 2364 2407 +43
==========================================
+ Hits 10670 11070 +400
+ Misses 681 670 -11
- Partials 527 535 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Spacing propertySpacing property
|
LGTM, just a test is missing. That check for the application of the class |
|
@henon Test added. Do you want me to squeeze in the spacing unification before preview2? |
No hurry. We'll do as many previews as we need. |
|
You may want to consider adding this to the v7 migration guide, as changing the display from block to flex on the form has caused formatting issues for our application, as our form child components were not expected to be in a flex container. I completely understand the usefulness of the change, but legacy implementations that set their own spacing/layout may now have to tweak. Easy enough to fix with a single wrapper div in the form or a Style change, but it's one of those things that is subtle and doesn't show up in unit testing. Some issues...
A potential backward compatible fix would be to have the form be display:block if the new spacing parameter is not set. I would humbly suggest any changes to a container's CSS "display" value be listed as a potential breaking change in the future. |
Description
Turns the MudForm into a flex display and uses that to add a
gap-*class based directly on a newSpacingproperty.Resolves #8859.
How Has This Been Tested?
visually
Type of Changes
video2.mp4
Checklist
dev).