Skip to content

Build: Remove "needs review" label from new PRs#11431

Merged
ScarletKuro merged 1 commit intoMudBlazor:devfrom
danielchalmers:workflow-pr-needs-review
May 30, 2025
Merged

Build: Remove "needs review" label from new PRs#11431
ScarletKuro merged 1 commit intoMudBlazor:devfrom
danielchalmers:workflow-pr-needs-review

Conversation

@danielchalmers
Copy link
Member

Description

I don't think it's serving a purpose beyond visual noise and is commonly not removed before merging anyway. Needing review is sort of implied.

How Has This Been Tested?

Type of Changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation (fix or improvement to the website or code docs)

Checklist

  • The PR is submitted to the correct branch (dev).
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I've added relevant tests.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the automatic addition of the "PR: needs review" label on new pull requests to reduce visual noise.

  • Eliminates the conditional block that applied the "PR: needs review" label for non-draft PRs
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/workflows/pr.yml:35

  • Consider adding a workflow integration test or updating documentation to verify that new PRs no longer receive the "PR: needs review" label, since this behavior change isn't covered by existing tests.
if(!pr.draft) {

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.13%. Comparing base (82ee87c) to head (2bcef98).
Report is 4 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev   #11431   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.12%   91.13%           
=======================================
  Files         465      465           
  Lines       14412    14412           
  Branches     2790     2790           
=======================================
+ Hits        13133    13134    +1     
  Misses        641      641           
+ Partials      638      637    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mikes-gh
Copy link
Contributor

mikes-gh commented May 30, 2025

I tend to agree seems superfluous and just another bit of admin. The GitHub reviewing process/approved status covers it I think. However @ScarletKuro may have reasons to keep it so I would defer the final decision.

@ScarletKuro ScarletKuro merged commit 9e7c694 into MudBlazor:dev May 30, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants