@dennisrahmen This is where I mentioned I wanted to reach in your original PR. Do you think it's in a good place?

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.59%. Comparing base (ddf89eb) to head (4348c10).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev   #10542   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.59%   91.59%           
=======================================
  Files         426      426           
  Lines       13298    13297    -1     
  Branches     2562     2561    -1     
=======================================
  Hits        12180    12180           
  Misses        546      546           
+ Partials      572      571    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@danielchalmers looks great!
I just updated my project yesterday and played around with the margins but yours is better than what I had.

Did you check when you have icons with different sizes in the same menu?

@danielchalmers looks great! I just updated my project yesterday and played around with the margins but yours is better than what I had.

Did you check when you have icons with different sizes in the same menu?

I ended up just explicitly removing the ability to change the icon size for the sake of aligning with the standard as it was more trouble than it's worth. Do you know of a use case for varying sizes that will be hurt by this change before final release? @dennisrahmen

Perfect opportunity to reference this #9143 (comment)

I don't think that it will have a huge impact, especially now that it is decoupled from the MudListItem.

Perfect opportunity to reference this #9143 (comment)

I don't think that it will have a huge impact, especially now that it is decoupled from the MudListItem.

Ahaha that's a great reference 😁

Yeah, I think decoupling was definitely the way to go so they can diverge to meet standards better. Do you think list items need any work in addition to this work on the menu items?

Do you think list items need any work in addition to this work on the menu items?

That's what I tried to address originally for everything that uses the MudListItem, because the weirdness with the margins originates from there.

When you look at the MudList examples, the icons on the left have to much spacing as well as not consistent spacing with the open/close icons on the right.

Also at that point I think it would make sense to remove the icon size there as well.