docs: add anti-abuse bond documentation#616
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
WalkthroughA new architecture document ChangesAnti-Abuse Bond Architecture Documentation
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Taker
participant MakerClient
participant Client
participant Daemon
Note over Taker,Daemon: Flow 1 — Taker pays bond
Daemon-->>Taker: pay-bond action
Taker->>Client: navigate to pay-bond screen
Taker->>Daemon: pay invoice
Note over MakerClient,Daemon: Flow 2 — Maker pays on order creation
MakerClient->>Client: set ephemeral bondPending flag
Daemon-->>MakerClient: add-bond-invoice action
MakerClient->>Daemon: pay invoice
Client->>Client: persist session after confirmation
Note over Client,Daemon: Flow 3 — Claim slashed share
Daemon-->>Client: bond-slashed action
Client->>Client: set BondPayoutPhase, compute deadline from slashed_at
Client->>Client: render badge/button on screen
Client->>Daemon: submit payout claim
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/architecture/ANTI_ABUSE_BOND.md`:
- Around line 138-152: Add language specifiers to three fenced code blocks in
docs/architecture/ANTI_ABUSE_BOND.md to comply with the Markdown guideline that
requires every fenced code block to have a language specifier. For the flow
diagram blocks at lines 138-152, 187-210, and 236-250, change the opening fence
from three backticks (` ``` `) to ` ```text ` to properly identify these blocks
as text content. Each of the three locations requires the same fix: add "text"
immediately after the opening three backticks.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d617e45e-bca1-4771-b611-c5c4bf0a379b
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/architecture/ANTI_ABUSE_BOND.md
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation