7.18.0 #8821

github-actions · 2024-03-01T23:01:35Z

This is the release candidate for version 7.18.0.

Changelog & Team Breakdown:
7.18.0-changelog.csv

github-actions · 2024-03-02T16:20:51Z

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

codecov-commenter · 2024-03-02T16:31:45Z

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 43.75%. Comparing base (521ef63) to head (2594742).

Files	Patch %	Lines
app/core/Analytics/MetaMetrics.ts	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8821      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.75%   43.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1273     1273              
  Lines       31112    31113       +1     
  Branches     3165     3165              
==========================================
  Hits        13612    13612              
- Misses      16686    16688       +2     
+ Partials      814      813       -1

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This PR cherry-picks #8859 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

NicolasMassart

Saving version number 1272 slot for Segment QA testing with prod creds

Bump to V7.18.0 1272 - Segment QA testing with prod creds

Segment QA testing with prod creds

This PR cherry picks #8775 Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sethkfman <[email protected]>

## **Description**  ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. Co-authored-by: Jyoti Puri <[email protected]>

This PR cherry-picks #8861 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

A-Feder · 2024-03-08T16:55:04Z

QA notes, iOS 7.18 (1268):

❗️General View Scenario 1: Changing the device language from English to Russian. 
COMMENT: ‘’Face ID’’ text overflowing on enable button, onboarding message on wallet view is displayed twice

❗Network Regression Scenario 1: I can remove a custom network added via the popular/custom network flow
COMMENT: "Do you want to remove this network" message doesn’t appear.

❗Network Regression Scenario 2: Adding a network via a Dapp
COMMENT: Couldn't connect to Aurora Mainnet, but it could be an issue with the dApp.

❗QR Scanner Scenario 2: I should be able to use the QR scanner on the send flow to scan an address.
COMMENT: The message 'recipient address is invalid' was displayed for some seconds before recognizing it.

❌ QR Scanner Scenario 5: When I scan an invalid address QR code using the in app camera I should see the appropriate warning message.
FAILED: the warning message does not appear

ZbrancaI · 2024-03-12T09:28:22Z

QA notes, Android 7.18 (build 1267):

❗️General View Scenario 1: Changing the device language from English to Russian.
COMMENT: The terms and conditions for the onboarding process are in English, not in Russian.

❗️Network Scenario 1.2: I can remove a custom network that was added via the custom network flow.
COMMENT: "Do you want to remove this network?" message doesn’t appear.

❗️Network Scenario 2: Adding a network via a Dapp.
COMMENT:

When connecting to Chainlist.wtf, the connect modal didn't appear;
I wasn't able to connect to Aurora Mainnet (it could be an issue with the dApp, as there was no problem connecting to Aurora Testnet);
The in-built browser sometimes remains on the main page, even if you insert a URL and press enter;
There was a UI issue, as the buttons were oriented too much on the bottom of the screen.

❗️Browser Scenario 9: Navigate to opensea.io, rarible.com, pancakeswap.finance, app.uniswap.org, and connect wallet account.
COMMENT: When connecting to app.uniswap.org, the app closed, redirecting me to the phone's home screen. Switching to Ethereum Mainnet takes a long time.

❌ QR Scanner Scenario 5: When I scan an invalid address QR code using the in-app camera, I should see the appropriate warning message.
COMMENT: The warning message does not appear!

❗️QR Scanner Scenario 8: User scans MMM Receive QR code on different network.
COMMENT: for the Avalanche - Ethereum QR test, the message 'recipient address is invalid' was displayed for some seconds before recognizing it. (Maybe the network didn't switch yet, but it only happened for Ethereum)

GENERAL COMMENT:
❗️The app is unresponsive for a while when switching on the Ethereum Mainnet for some functionalities (QR scanner, the bottom menu).

This PR cherry-picks #8829 (removing all Mixpanel code) Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

This PR cherry-picks #8877 Co-authored-by: salimtb <[email protected]>

This PR cherry-picks #8888 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cal Leung <[email protected]>

cc ## **Description** - Bumped app build version from 1273 -> 1279, for RC 2  ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

This PR cherry-picks #8929 Co-authored-by: Xiaoming Wang <[email protected]>

## **Description**  This PR does a few things: - Remove redundant track event directory from Segment intergration - Disable jest caching - Fix audit issue for `follow-redirects`. Just regenerating yarn lock to capture higher version ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

) **Description** Fix to migration 29 with missing tokens related migrations, migration 30 with PPOM enabled by default, migration 31 to help user impacted by missing migration on 29, migration 32 remove goerli Also added migration 33, to recover from the crash of the users that the migration 29 and 30 didn't had effect. ## **Related issues** Fixes #8849 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Cal-L <[email protected]>

## **Description**  Bump for v7.18.0 RC 3 1281 ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Omri Dan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Mark Stacey <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matthew Walsh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tommasini <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pedro Pablo Aste Kompen <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jongsun Suh <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Xiaoming Wang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vivek <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sahar-fehri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: abretonc7s <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jyoti Puri <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cal Leung <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Curtis David <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sethkfman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: CW <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sylva Elendu <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jiexi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: salimtb <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: OGPoyraz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Elliot Winkler <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Gustavo Antunes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Timi Tejumola <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: João Loureiro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sethkfman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: SamuelSalas <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: seaona <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Victorien Gauch <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Olusegun Akintayo <[email protected]>

sethkfman

LGTM

github-actions · 2024-03-18T19:35:54Z

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 9a9ecee
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/e743bdb5-c221-4bef-b369-5bcabde57873

Note

You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

github-actions · 2024-03-18T20:19:11Z

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 9f86026
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/d201372e-ed38-47ad-88cc-e4a71e2229af

Note

You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

## **Description**  Reverts PR #8919, which broke E2E tests ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings**  ### **Before**  ### **After**  ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved. - [ ] I've linked related issues - [ ] I've included manual testing steps - [ ] I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I’ve properly set the pull request status: - [ ] In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft". - [ ] In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft". ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

github-actions · 2024-03-18T23:18:19Z

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 2594742
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/9b5eeb76-49f9-4647-a27a-858b9bfb1639

Note

You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

sonarqubecloud · 2024-03-18T23:27:24Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
50.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Cal-L · 2024-03-19T00:07:31Z

E2E tests - https://app.bitrise.io/build/8e50cc3a-63f5-419f-96cf-bb5f676b1d5d. iOS regression tests are failing but are coming from main and is not related to 7.18.0

Cal-L

LGTM

chrisleewilcox

LGTM according to https://consensys.slack.com/archives/C029JG63136/p1710786183530369?thread_ts=1709396730.429849&cid=C029JG63136

7.18.0

fcafb8a

metamaskbot added the release-7.18.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.18.0 label Mar 2, 2024

updated changelog

a0e4022

chore: cherry-pick #8859 (#8874)

a674fbb

This PR cherry-picks #8859 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

This was referenced Mar 7, 2024

feat: add env vars mapping in build script #8859

Merged

chore: cherry-pick #8859 #8874

Merged

NicolasMassart reviewed Mar 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

NicolasMassart and others added 3 commits March 7, 2024 15:53

Bump version to 1272 (#8876)

8ff9fae

Bump to V7.18.0 1272 - Segment QA testing with prod creds

Bump version to 1273 (#8878)

4b46e7a

Segment QA testing with prod creds

chore: cherry-pick #8775 (#8879)

af10268

This PR cherry picks #8775 Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sethkfman <[email protected]>

This was referenced Mar 7, 2024

chore: cherry-pick #8775 #8879

Merged

New Crowdin translations by Github Action #8775

Merged

seaona and others added 2 commits March 7, 2024 12:34

chore: cherry-pick #8861 (#8880)

8a59b2c

This PR cherry-picks #8861 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

metamaskbot mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024

chore: cherry-pick #8861 #8880

Merged

chore: cherry-pick #8829 (#8884)

bd949dc

This PR cherry-picks #8829 (removing all Mixpanel code) Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]>

metamaskbot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2024

chore: cherry-pick #8829 #8884

Merged

chore: cherry-pick #8877 (#8890)

f6ab1b3

This PR cherry-picks #8877 Co-authored-by: salimtb <[email protected]>

metamaskbot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2024

fix: fix url bug display #8877

Merged

13 tasks

github-actions bot and others added 2 commits March 13, 2024 19:34

chore: cherry-pick #8888 (#8929)

245aed8

This PR cherry-picks #8888 Co-authored-by: Nico MASSART <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cal Leung <[email protected]>

metamaskbot mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2024

chore: cherry-pick #8888 #8929

Merged

chore: cherry-pick #8929 (#8940)

f907234

This PR cherry-picks #8929 Co-authored-by: Xiaoming Wang <[email protected]>

metamaskbot mentioned this pull request Mar 14, 2024

chore: cherry-pick #8929 #8940

Merged

Cal-L and others added 2 commits March 14, 2024 15:43

Cal-L added the Run Smoke E2E label Mar 15, 2024

Kylan Hurt and others added 2 commits March 18, 2024 13:30

Merge branch 'main' into release/7.18.0

9a9ecee

sethkfman marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2024 19:34

sethkfman requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2024 19:34

sethkfman added the QA Passed QA testing has been completed and passed label Mar 18, 2024

sethkfman previously approved these changes Mar 18, 2024

View reviewed changes

sethkfman added the team-mobile-platform Mobile Platform team label Mar 18, 2024

Merge branch 'main' into release/7.18.0

9f86026

github-actions bot requested a review from a team March 18, 2024 20:12

sethkfman added Run Smoke E2E and removed Run Smoke E2E labels Mar 18, 2024

Cal-L dismissed sethkfman’s stale review via 2594742 March 18, 2024 23:16

Cal-L added Run Smoke E2E and removed Run Smoke E2E labels Mar 18, 2024

github-actions bot added the Run Smoke E2E label Mar 18, 2024

Cal-L approved these changes Mar 19, 2024

View reviewed changes

chrisleewilcox approved these changes Mar 19, 2024

View reviewed changes

Cal-L merged commit 9739816 into main Mar 19, 2024

github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 19, 2024

metamaskbot added the release-7.19.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.19.0 label Mar 19, 2024

Uh oh!

7.18.0 #8821

7.18.0 #8821

Uh oh!

Conversation

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024 • edited by sethkfman Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Mar 2, 2024 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

NicolasMassart left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

A-Feder commented Mar 8, 2024

Uh oh!

ZbrancaI commented Mar 12, 2024

Uh oh!

sethkfman left a comment • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 • edited by metamaskbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Bitrise

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 • edited by metamaskbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Bitrise

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 • edited by metamaskbot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Bitrise

Uh oh!

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 18, 2024

Quality Gate passed

Uh oh!

Cal-L commented Mar 19, 2024

Uh oh!

Cal-L left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

chrisleewilcox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

13 participants

github-actions bot commented Mar 1, 2024 •

edited by sethkfman

Loading

codecov-commenter commented Mar 2, 2024 •

edited

Loading

NicolasMassart left a comment •

edited

Loading

sethkfman left a comment •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 •

edited by metamaskbot

Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 •

edited by metamaskbot

Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 18, 2024 •

edited by metamaskbot

Loading