Repository navigation
Revert "environmentd: restart halts within the container (#40029)" - #40061
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This reverts commit e6e3e21. With the in-container restart loop, an environmentd that halts after losing leadership restarts inside its old container instead of exiting. When its pod has already been replaced, the kubelet would not restart that container, but the wrapper does: the new process opens the catalog in writable mode, takes a higher epoch and fences out the current leader. The nightly "K8s recovery: envd on failing node" test hits this when the paused envd node is unpaused, and the replacement environmentd panics with Durable(Fence(Epoch { current_epoch: 3, fence_epoch: 4 })). Refs: SQL-807 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
bosconi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 26, 2026
) This re-lands the in-container restart of #40029 ([SQL-807](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/SQL-807)) for the read-only catch-up halts only, so a fenced environmentd in a replaced pod no longer restarts and fences the live leader. ### Motivation #40029 restarted environmentd inside its container on every `halt!` (exit 166), to avoid Kubernetes crash backoff for repeated catch-up halts during zero-downtime upgrades. #40061 reverted it, and this PR is based on main after that revert, because #40029 broke the nightly job `K8s recovery: envd on failing node`. * Failing with #40029: [nightly #18553](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18553#01a15ba6-bf60-4bb3-b6ff-db71cf56c89a) (main, all three attempts), [#18550](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18550), [#18551](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18551). One branch build with #40029, [#18554](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18554), passed, so the failure is a race. * Passing without it: [#18543](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18543), [#18545](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18545), [#18546](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18546), [#18548](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18548), [#18552](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18552), [#18556](https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/18556). * Signature: the replacement `environmentd-0` panics with `unable to advance catalog upper: Durable(Fence(Epoch { current_epoch: 3, fence_epoch: 4 }))` right after the old envd node is unpaused. * Mechanism: the old environmentd, resumed after its pod was replaced, is fenced and halts with 166. The kubelet would not restart a deleted pod, but the #40029 wrapper did. The new process opened the catalog writable, took epoch 4 and fenced the replacement until the kubelet killed the container. The halts that [SQL-807](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/SQL-807) is about are the DDL reboots in `check_ddl_changes`, which a read-only deployment can hit many times while it catches up. ### Description * `mz_ore::process`: add `RESTART_IN_PLACE_EXIT_CODE` (75, `EX_TEMPFAIL`) and the `restart_in_place!` macro, which behaves like `halt!` but exits with 75. Name the existing halt code `HALT_EXIT_CODE` (166). Shells, tini and Kubernetes report death by signal N as 128 + N, so a code below 128 can only come from an explicit exit. * `src/environmentd/ci/entrypoint.sh`: restart environmentd in place only on 75, and export `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE=true` before doing so. Every other exit, including 166, ends the container as before #40029. A graceful exit still sleeps forever. * `preflight_0dt`: when `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE` is set (the hidden `--restarted-in-place` flag) and the catalog is at this process's own generation, halt with 166 instead of booting writable ([`preflight.rs#L70-L82`](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/materialize/blob/a5f2ab0c41e844fc109211a460fb76a53c1282ca/src/environmentd/src/deployment/preflight.rs#L70-L82)). * Only read-only code paths restart in place, so that combination means a process of this generation has been promoted: one in a pod that replaced this one, or, after a skipped catch-up, this container's previous process, whose read-only bootstrap restarted after the takeover. Booting writable would fence a replacement, and halting is correct in both cases. * A kubelet restart starts a new container without the marker, so a pod that wasn't replaced still boots as leader. * `check_ddl_changes`: use `restart_in_place!` only while the catalog's deployment generation is still older than this process's, so the restarted process boots read-only. Once a process of this generation has been promoted, halt with 166 (`deployment generation N has been promoted; halting`). The generation is read from the openable catalog that the check already builds, before `open_savepoint` consumes it, so the check reads one catalog snapshot, not two. * Storage controller: the read-only halt in `create_collections_for_bootstrap` for a dependency deleted during bootstrap uses `restart_in_place!` ([`lib.rs#L1031-L1047`](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/materialize/blob/a5f2ab0c41e844fc109211a460fb76a53c1282ca/src/storage-controller/src/lib.rs#L1031-L1047)). It keeps `halt!` when writable. * The takeover halt after promotion (`fenced out old deployment; rebooting as leader`) keeps `halt!`. That process has just opened the catalog writable, and a restart in place would only reach the marker check one boot later. * `tini -g` and the entrypoint's TERM/INT traps are restored as #40029 had them: environmentd receives SIGTERM itself, and the shell exits after it instead of restarting or sleeping. * `bin/environmentd` (`misc/python/materialize/cli/run.py`) restarts on 75 as it does on 166. Residual: a stale read-only process in a replaced pod still restarts in place on these halts until the kubelet kills its container. The marker keeps it from booting writable, but it competes with the replacement for the generation's replicas during that window. ### Tests * `cargo check` and `cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings` for `mz-ore`, `mz-environmentd`, `mz-storage-controller` and `mz-sqllogictest` with Rust 1.98.1: clean. `rustfmt --check` on the changed Rust files: clean. * `shellcheck -s sh src/environmentd/ci/entrypoint.sh` (koalaman/shellcheck): clean. * Entrypoint loop under busybox `sh` with a stub `environmentd`: * exits 75 then 0: restarted once with the same arguments and `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE=true`, then sleeps. * exits 75, 75, 166: restarted twice, then the container exits 166. * exits 166, 1 or 134: the container exits with that code, no restart. * `docker stop` under tini with `-g`: environmentd gets SIGTERM, and the container exits 143 within 0.1 s. * `test/0dt` workflow `restarted-in-place-after-promotion`: promotes `mz_new`, then starts a second process of its generation with `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE=true`, and asserts that it exits 166 with the marker halt while `mz_new` keeps serving as leader. Without the marker check, that process would fence `mz_new`. * Not run: `K8s recovery: envd on failing node` needs the cloudtest kind cluster, and it and the `test/0dt` workflows, including the new one, need image builds. Please run the nightly job against this branch before merging. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <[email protected]>
val-materialize
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2026
Release notes for the **v26.48.0** train. One commit is added per snapshot; the `final` snapshot sets the real dates. **Applied: `rc.1`, `rc.2`, `rc.3`, `final` — the train is complete.** - **Content**: 3 Feature sections (upsert hydration; Kafka sink headers GA; MySQL `EXCLUDE ALL NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS`), 9 Improvements, 2 Guides, 4 Bug Fixes. No **Agent Skills** section — every agent-skills PR in all four windows was omitted. - **Scope**: 123 PRs across the four snapshots — rc.1 114 (14 included), rc.2 5 (0 included), rc.3 1 (1 included), final 3 (0 included). - **Dates — now real, not provisional**: Cloud **2026-10-29**, Self-Managed **2026-10-30**. The `rc.1`-anchored provisional estimate was right, so `final` left both files unchanged. The `v26.48.0` tag's commit date is 2026-10-28T18:35:05Z, a Wednesday; the first Thursday on or after it is 2026-10-29, with Self-Managed the day after. - **Operator compatibility**: row for `v26.48`, release date `2026-10-30`. Unchanged by rc.2, rc.3, and final. - **Branch base**: `main`, whose newest published section was `## v26.46.1` when this branch was cut; v26.47.0 and v26.47.1 have since merged in. `v26.48.0` stays at the top of the list. ### final increment — empty, and verified empty `final`'s commit is empty. The tracking issue ([release#627](MaterializeInc/release#627)) lists exactly one item, the unassociated `4edd60a8d` "release: bump to version v26.48.0", which the release-process-automation rule omits. The three agent-skills PRs in the window ([#118](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#118), [#119](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#119), [#120](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#120)) were all omitted. This was **verified rather than assumed**, because a zero-PR snapshot and a failed fetch produce identical output: `compare/v26.48.0-rc.3...v26.48.0` returns `total_commits: 1`, and that commit is the version bump. Nothing merged onto the release branch in the 42 h 49 m between the `rc.3` tag and the ship tag. Across the train, every agent-skills PR from [#111](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#111) to [#120](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#120) falls in exactly one window, with no gaps or overlaps.⚠️ **One decision is still open for the release owner — see "Upsert v2" below.** Every flag this train held open was re-read in source at the `v26.48.0` ship tag rather than inherited from the RC snapshots: | Flag | Default at `v26.48.0` | Source | Held since | Disposition | | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | | `enable_upsert_v2` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:505-509` | rc.2 |⚠️ premise contradicted — see below | | `enable_upsert_chunked_stash` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:469-475` | rc.2 | same | | `enable_upsert_paged_spill` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:450-455` | rc.2 | same | | `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` | **`false`** | `src/adapter-dyncfgs/src/dyncfgs.rs:295-299` | rc.1 | hold stands — still omitted | | `cluster-details-page-cns-173` | n/a (LaunchDarkly) | no source default | rc.1 | hold stands — still omitted | **The rc.2 hold on [#40189](#40189) rests on a premise this branch now contradicts.** rc.2 omitted it at Borderline on exactly one ground — every measurement is taken on a path `enable_upsert_v2` keeps off by default — and asked whether any environment actually runs upsert v2. The branch answers that without anyone feeding the answer back: the human-added **"Improved hydration times and memory efficiency for upsert sources"** section states *"This change has been rolled out to all Materialize Cloud environments and applies to all existing and new clusters."* The three flags still read `false` at the ship tag, which is exactly the source-default-versus-LaunchDarkly divergence the rollout-lever rule covers: the published docs call wins, and the sole stated reason for the omit has fallen away. - **Not already covered.** The published section is about **hydration** — building a source from scratch, 206 min → 108–113 min, 542 GiB → 183–208 GiB. #40189 is about **catch-up after a backlog**, a different operation with its own motivating incident ([CPU-320](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/CPU-320): a source that *"could not catch up on any replica size after a producer rate increase"*). A customer who read the hydration section would learn nothing about catch-up. - **Suggested Improvements bullet, to add only if you confirm** — it was *not* applied in the `final` commit: > **Faster catch-up for upsert sources with a large backlog**: An upsert source working through a backlog now drains one timestamp per round instead of merging and re-pushing the whole backlog each round, so catch-up time grows linearly rather than quadratically with the backlog; draining a 100-timestamp tail fell from 6.5 to 0.15 seconds, and a 400-timestamp tail drains in 0.67 seconds. - **Caveat that must travel with the decision**: the baseline in those timings is the *paged* flavor on `main`, not the configuration Cloud ran before this rollout — so they are not a clean before/after for a given customer. Dropping the two timings and keeping the linear-versus-quadratic claim holds regardless of baseline. - **Two weaker links, stated rather than buried**: that the rolled-out configuration is the one #40189 was measured on is *inferred from the published section's prose* (its "buffer pool … serve sequential work from disk" reads as chunked stash plus paged spill), not confirmed by anyone. And the author declared "Release notes: None", naming `enable_upsert_v2` — so publishing this would be an **override** of an author signal, justified by your own later rollout statement. - **Third consecutive train** to hold this flag: `v26.44.0-rc.1` ([#39041](#39041)), `v26.45.0-rc.1` ([#39044](#39044)), `v26.48.0-rc.2` (#40189). If the rollout statement is accurate, the earlier two are worth revisiting rather than left to age out. **The other two holds stand, corroborated.** `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` still reads `false` at the ship tag and the five MCP PRs rc.1 held appear nowhere in the section; neither does the Console cluster-details page stack. In both cases you had the whole train in view and did not promote them — the confirmation rc.1 asked for, arriving in the negative. **No duplicates, re-checked at ship.** The seven PRs rc.1 flagged as already covered by v26.47.0 are still absent, the `## v26.47.1` section is untouched, and rc.3's entry ([#40065](#40065)) appears exactly once. **Two notes on human edits to this branch**, both recorded as fact rather than objection: - `524adb8` removed the rc.1 feature section **"Native Google Cloud Storage for persist"** ([#39983](#39983)) outright. Flagging it only because a published entry disappearing is easy to miss in a long branch — if that was deliberate, nothing to do. - Two rc.1 Improvements were promoted to their own feature sections with docs links and a code sample (Kafka sink headers [#39908](#39908); MySQL `EXCLUDE ALL NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS` [#39873](#39873)), and a **Guides** section was added that is not in the skill's template. The lesson for next time: an option whose flag flipped to `true` in the same release more likely warrants a feature section than the Improvements bullet the rubric suggests by default. **Carried forward from rc.3 and still open**: the `K8s recovery: envd on failing node` nightly — the job that sank [#40029](#40029), the first attempt at what #40065 re-lands — **was not checked**; it needs Buildkite, outside this run. The entry itself was verified correct in source at both the rc.3 and ship tags, so this is a CI-confidence question, not a notes-accuracy one. ### rc.3 increment One Improvement, for #40065: a read-only `environmentd` that reboots to pick up DDL changes during zero-downtime upgrade catch-up now restarts in place rather than exiting its container, so Kubernetes no longer applies crash-restart backoff. Not inherited from rc.1 — rc.1 correctly omitted the first attempt (#40029) together with its revert (#40061) as a no-op on `main`; rc.3 re-lands the behavior in narrowed form, verified as a real change by comparing `entrypoint.sh` at the `v26.47.0` tag (no retry loop) against `v26.48.0-rc.3` (re-exec on exit 75). The draft's closing "so zero-downtime upgrades catch up faster" was cut: no cited PR measures an upgrade duration, so the entry claims only the mechanism. - **Not a Bug Fix.** 0dt upgrades completed on v26.47.0; the catch-up reboots merely collected backoff delay. Existing behavior improved, so Improvements. - **Residual, deliberately unpublished.** A stale read-only process in a replaced pod still restarts in place on these halts until the kubelet kills its container, competing with its replacement for the generation's replicas. The `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE` marker check keeps it from booting writable, so it cannot fence the leader — the failure #40061 reverted. Worth watching if 0dt reports look odd after this ships. ### rc.2 increment — empty, by design rc.2's commit is empty: no entry was published and the provisional dates did not move. It exists so later runs can see from the commit subject that rc.2 was applied. Its single materialize PR, #40189, is the open item discussed under the `final` increment above. ### rc.1 — standing warnings⚠️ **Seven PRs in rc.1's tracking issue were already covered by the v26.47.0 train, and none is republished here.** v26.47.0 took five RCs whose later ones were cherry-picks onto the release branch; the same PRs appear in this issue because they are also what landed on `main` for v26.48.0. Four of the seven **shipped to Cloud in v26.47.0 on 2026-10-22** — #37653, #39910, #39927, #40036 — so republishing any of them would put duplicate text in front of customers eight days later. The other three (#39903, #39906, #40046) were held at Borderline in v26.47.0 and are held again here, each reason re-checked rather than inherited. The "snapshots are disjoint by construction" guarantee holds *within* a train, not across trains, so this was caught mechanically by grepping every PR number in the issue against the v26.47.0 snapshot directories. All seven are listed under their own heading in `rc.1/omitted.md`. **Open questions for the release owner** - **Upsert v2** (#40189, rc.2) — see the `final` increment above. The rollout statement on this branch has changed the picture since rc.2; this is the one item that needs a decision before merge. - **MCP protocol revision 2026-07-28** (#39698, #39702, #39703, #39759, #39761) — the stack is complete and `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` still defaults to **`false`** at the ship tag. Omitted, with the absence of any MCP text on this branch taken as confirmation. Drafted wording remains in `rc.1/omitted.md` if the flag flips. - **Redesigned cluster details page in the Console** (#39446, #39507, #39508, #39510, #39607) — omitted for the same reason. Note that the Improvements section does carry **"New cluster details page on Self-Managed"**, added by hand, which links the v26.47 section rather than re-describing the page. - **Schema projection on the Console's Freshness page** (#40031) — a genuine new way to diagnose lag, but the author states the whole Freshness page "is currently behind a feature flag that is only enabled for certain customers in impersonation mode". **Is the page generally reachable yet?** This is the same page v26.47.0 held for the same reason. - **Time zone data 2026e timing** (#40045) — the author flags the Canadian zone changes as effective **2026-11-01**, three days after the Cloud date. Tight, but it holds. *Resolved since rc.1: the Kafka sink headers framing question — the GA section on this branch answers it.* **Verification notes** — rc.1's Step 5 pass cut one drafted entry and rewrote four: - **Cut**: a Bug Fix drafted for #40032 ("halt with exit code 168 when a live reader loses its lease"). The PR's own Problem section is about alerting — `mz_persist_lease_timeout_read` cannot distinguish a dead reader from a stuck one — and the follow-up it names is a Cloud alerting change. Nothing a customer observes changes. - **tzdata** (#40045): the draft said the Canadian zones move to "permanent daylight saving time", the author's prose. The PR's data table shows a permanent **−05/EST** and **−06/CST** — summer *offsets* kept year-round, but with another zone's standard-time *abbreviations*, which is what a user sees from `AT TIME ZONE`. Reworded to what the table supports. - **Hydration memory** (#39923): scoped to the consolidation step and the measured outcome (~628 GiB peak, no restart, against every pre-change run exiting on the 849 GiB limit). The PR explicitly says the fix "covers this consolidation path, not the sink's whole footprint"; [CPU-317](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/CPU-317) tracks the rest. - **Kafka clients** (#40026): "55 to 24" is measured on a 4-worker, 11-source setup. The CPU throttling and degraded freshness are observed symptoms of the *old* behavior at a few hundred sources, not a measured post-change result at that scale, so the entry states the count as the outcome and the throttling as what the count drove. - **`environmentd` accept backlog** (#40035): the author's hedge is kept — "less likely to be restarted", not eliminated, because the PR says "This makes the queue fill later, not never." **Judgment calls a reviewer may want to revisit** — #39605 is filed as an **Improvement**, not a Bug Fix: nothing was incorrect, an unbounded operation gained a bound and a knob. #40101 is filed as a **Bug Fix** rather than omitted under the internal-logging rule, because credentials reaching the logs is a security defect with a user-visible remedy; only credentials a user inlined rather than wrapped in a `SECRET` were affected. Snapshot drafts (with PR links) in mz-skills: - rc.1: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/omitted.md) - rc.2: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/omitted.md) - rc.3: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.3/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.3/omitted.md) - final: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/final/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/final/omitted.md) **Borderline PRs omitted:** rc.1: 12 — [omitted.md#borderline](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/omitted.md#borderline), rc.2: 1 — [omitted.md#borderline](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/omitted.md#borderline), rc.3: 0, final: 0 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Valerie Chiang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pranshu Maheshwari <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pranshu Maheshwari <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts #40029, because its in-container restart loop lets a fenced environmentd reboot inside a pod that Kubernetes has already replaced, take a new catalog epoch and fence out the live leader.
Motivation
The nightly job
K8s recovery: envd on failing nodefails on main since #40029 (SQL-807).Failed to achieve 'no issues after node recovery' ... within 10s. The replacementenvironmentd-0panics withunable to advance catalog upper: Durable(Fence(Epoch { current_epoch: 3, fence_epoch: 4 }))(exit 134) right after the old envd node is unpaused.Timeline from #18553 attempt 3 (kail, clusterd logs, k8s events):
mzcloud-worker9(pod IP 10.244.5.2) and initializes the catalog (epoch 2). 00:54:22: the test pauses worker9.environmentd-0boots on worker8 (10.244.2.2), opens the catalog writable (epoch 3) and serves queries.fence_epoch: 4.Killingevent (Stopping container environmentd) follows. The replacement restarts and the test query hits it.Only a writable catalog open bumps the epoch (
Mode::Writableinsrc/catalog/src/durable/persist.rs), and the replacement booted once in that window. So epoch 4 came from a new environmentd process started inside the old, already deleted pod on worker9. The events show no secondStartedfor the old pod; its only container start is the original one at 00:53.That fits the wrapper's new behavior:
fenced by envdinstorage_collections.rsor the txn-wal fence.entrypoint.shexited the container on 166. For a pod that is already deleted, the kubelet does not restart it.The same can happen outside the test whenever an environmentd that lost leadership halts while its pod is being replaced, for example after a node failure. The restart loop bypasses the kubelet's decision about whether that container should run again.
Description
git revert e6e3e21f2e: restoretiniwithout-gand theentrypoint.shthat exits on any nonzero status.Avoiding crash backoff for repeated catch-up halts during zero-downtime upgrades (SQL-807) still needs a fix. A restart that only covers halts that are safe to retry in place, such as a distinct exit code for the preflight reboots in
src/environmentd/src/deployment/preflight.rs, would avoid this. That is left to the owner.Tests
K8s recovery: envd on failing nodefrom the nightly pipeline against this branch before merging. Since the failure is a race, a pass is only meaningful together with the three failing attempts on #18553.🤖 Generated with Claude Code