Repository navigation
Conversation
…tion When a since jump crosses many distinct buffered times, consolidate_before collected every update below the upper into one owned Vec, sorted it, and built a chain from it. That puts the whole buffer on the heap as owned rows. A hydrating MV sink hits this when its first batch lands: the since jumps across every timestamp the input produced while the snapshot was being written. On staging, a lineitem x4 MV at TPC-H scale factor 100 grew its swap from 300 GiB to over 700 GiB in this path and exited on the replica's heap limit, with both the sync and the async sink. The updates are now sorted in runs of at most 2^20, each minted as a chain whose chunks can spill, and the runs are merged. Each input chain is dropped once read. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
A run that consolidation leaves at most half full keeps accumulating, so updates that cancel within the heap mint no chunks. Minted runs merge into their predecessors while they hold at least half as many updates, so the stack stays logarithmic in the updates and cancelling updates meet at the first merge that brings them together. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
antiguru
commented
Oct 19, 2026
A run of 2^20 updates held about 170 MiB per worker for rows of TPC-H lineitem's width. At 2^16 it holds about 12 MiB, for 28 to 39% more time in `sort_advanced` on a benchmark of 8 Mi such updates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
`sort_advanced` read each input chain through `Chain::iter`, which keeps the whole chain, and its pool slots, alive until its last update is read. While one chain the size of a snapshot was re-sorted, both it and the runs built from it were live. Reading the chain by value drops each chunk right after it is copied out. Intermediate runs of the geometric merge are now written one generation deeper than their inputs, so the pool can compress them, and the run length's doc mentions the merges' chunks in the heap bound. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
frankmcsherry
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2026
frankmcsherry
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have read and understand. Generally, like the direction of moving the work to be out-of-core friendly by default. It seems like there are some opportunities to tighten this further, and leaving it up to you about whether they should land as part of this PR or can follow afterwards as time permits.
This was referenced Oct 19, 2026
…rough the pool Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Pushing updates into the run from inside the chunk's scoped view drops the per-chunk copy that `Chain::into_updates` collected, and the helper with it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Member
Author
|
I change the implementation to free chunks while reading, avoiding keeping two copies of the data in memory. Thanks for the review! |
antiguru
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 20, 2026 07:48
val-materialize
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2026
Release notes for the **v26.48.0** train. One commit is added per snapshot; the `final` snapshot sets the real dates. **Applied: `rc.1`, `rc.2`, `rc.3`, `final` — the train is complete.** - **Content**: 3 Feature sections (upsert hydration; Kafka sink headers GA; MySQL `EXCLUDE ALL NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS`), 9 Improvements, 2 Guides, 4 Bug Fixes. No **Agent Skills** section — every agent-skills PR in all four windows was omitted. - **Scope**: 123 PRs across the four snapshots — rc.1 114 (14 included), rc.2 5 (0 included), rc.3 1 (1 included), final 3 (0 included). - **Dates — now real, not provisional**: Cloud **2026-10-29**, Self-Managed **2026-10-30**. The `rc.1`-anchored provisional estimate was right, so `final` left both files unchanged. The `v26.48.0` tag's commit date is 2026-10-28T18:35:05Z, a Wednesday; the first Thursday on or after it is 2026-10-29, with Self-Managed the day after. - **Operator compatibility**: row for `v26.48`, release date `2026-10-30`. Unchanged by rc.2, rc.3, and final. - **Branch base**: `main`, whose newest published section was `## v26.46.1` when this branch was cut; v26.47.0 and v26.47.1 have since merged in. `v26.48.0` stays at the top of the list. ### final increment — empty, and verified empty `final`'s commit is empty. The tracking issue ([release#627](MaterializeInc/release#627)) lists exactly one item, the unassociated `4edd60a8d` "release: bump to version v26.48.0", which the release-process-automation rule omits. The three agent-skills PRs in the window ([#118](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#118), [#119](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#119), [#120](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#120)) were all omitted. This was **verified rather than assumed**, because a zero-PR snapshot and a failed fetch produce identical output: `compare/v26.48.0-rc.3...v26.48.0` returns `total_commits: 1`, and that commit is the version bump. Nothing merged onto the release branch in the 42 h 49 m between the `rc.3` tag and the ship tag. Across the train, every agent-skills PR from [#111](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#111) to [#120](MaterializeInc/agent-skills#120) falls in exactly one window, with no gaps or overlaps.⚠️ **One decision is still open for the release owner — see "Upsert v2" below.** Every flag this train held open was re-read in source at the `v26.48.0` ship tag rather than inherited from the RC snapshots: | Flag | Default at `v26.48.0` | Source | Held since | Disposition | | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | | `enable_upsert_v2` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:505-509` | rc.2 |⚠️ premise contradicted — see below | | `enable_upsert_chunked_stash` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:469-475` | rc.2 | same | | `enable_upsert_paged_spill` | **`false`** | `src/storage-types/src/dyncfgs.rs:450-455` | rc.2 | same | | `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` | **`false`** | `src/adapter-dyncfgs/src/dyncfgs.rs:295-299` | rc.1 | hold stands — still omitted | | `cluster-details-page-cns-173` | n/a (LaunchDarkly) | no source default | rc.1 | hold stands — still omitted | **The rc.2 hold on [#40189](#40189) rests on a premise this branch now contradicts.** rc.2 omitted it at Borderline on exactly one ground — every measurement is taken on a path `enable_upsert_v2` keeps off by default — and asked whether any environment actually runs upsert v2. The branch answers that without anyone feeding the answer back: the human-added **"Improved hydration times and memory efficiency for upsert sources"** section states *"This change has been rolled out to all Materialize Cloud environments and applies to all existing and new clusters."* The three flags still read `false` at the ship tag, which is exactly the source-default-versus-LaunchDarkly divergence the rollout-lever rule covers: the published docs call wins, and the sole stated reason for the omit has fallen away. - **Not already covered.** The published section is about **hydration** — building a source from scratch, 206 min → 108–113 min, 542 GiB → 183–208 GiB. #40189 is about **catch-up after a backlog**, a different operation with its own motivating incident ([CPU-320](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/CPU-320): a source that *"could not catch up on any replica size after a producer rate increase"*). A customer who read the hydration section would learn nothing about catch-up. - **Suggested Improvements bullet, to add only if you confirm** — it was *not* applied in the `final` commit: > **Faster catch-up for upsert sources with a large backlog**: An upsert source working through a backlog now drains one timestamp per round instead of merging and re-pushing the whole backlog each round, so catch-up time grows linearly rather than quadratically with the backlog; draining a 100-timestamp tail fell from 6.5 to 0.15 seconds, and a 400-timestamp tail drains in 0.67 seconds. - **Caveat that must travel with the decision**: the baseline in those timings is the *paged* flavor on `main`, not the configuration Cloud ran before this rollout — so they are not a clean before/after for a given customer. Dropping the two timings and keeping the linear-versus-quadratic claim holds regardless of baseline. - **Two weaker links, stated rather than buried**: that the rolled-out configuration is the one #40189 was measured on is *inferred from the published section's prose* (its "buffer pool … serve sequential work from disk" reads as chunked stash plus paged spill), not confirmed by anyone. And the author declared "Release notes: None", naming `enable_upsert_v2` — so publishing this would be an **override** of an author signal, justified by your own later rollout statement. - **Third consecutive train** to hold this flag: `v26.44.0-rc.1` ([#39041](#39041)), `v26.45.0-rc.1` ([#39044](#39044)), `v26.48.0-rc.2` (#40189). If the rollout statement is accurate, the earlier two are worth revisiting rather than left to age out. **The other two holds stand, corroborated.** `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` still reads `false` at the ship tag and the five MCP PRs rc.1 held appear nowhere in the section; neither does the Console cluster-details page stack. In both cases you had the whole train in view and did not promote them — the confirmation rc.1 asked for, arriving in the negative. **No duplicates, re-checked at ship.** The seven PRs rc.1 flagged as already covered by v26.47.0 are still absent, the `## v26.47.1` section is untouched, and rc.3's entry ([#40065](#40065)) appears exactly once. **Two notes on human edits to this branch**, both recorded as fact rather than objection: - `524adb8` removed the rc.1 feature section **"Native Google Cloud Storage for persist"** ([#39983](#39983)) outright. Flagging it only because a published entry disappearing is easy to miss in a long branch — if that was deliberate, nothing to do. - Two rc.1 Improvements were promoted to their own feature sections with docs links and a code sample (Kafka sink headers [#39908](#39908); MySQL `EXCLUDE ALL NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS` [#39873](#39873)), and a **Guides** section was added that is not in the skill's template. The lesson for next time: an option whose flag flipped to `true` in the same release more likely warrants a feature section than the Improvements bullet the rubric suggests by default. **Carried forward from rc.3 and still open**: the `K8s recovery: envd on failing node` nightly — the job that sank [#40029](#40029), the first attempt at what #40065 re-lands — **was not checked**; it needs Buildkite, outside this run. The entry itself was verified correct in source at both the rc.3 and ship tags, so this is a CI-confidence question, not a notes-accuracy one. ### rc.3 increment One Improvement, for #40065: a read-only `environmentd` that reboots to pick up DDL changes during zero-downtime upgrade catch-up now restarts in place rather than exiting its container, so Kubernetes no longer applies crash-restart backoff. Not inherited from rc.1 — rc.1 correctly omitted the first attempt (#40029) together with its revert (#40061) as a no-op on `main`; rc.3 re-lands the behavior in narrowed form, verified as a real change by comparing `entrypoint.sh` at the `v26.47.0` tag (no retry loop) against `v26.48.0-rc.3` (re-exec on exit 75). The draft's closing "so zero-downtime upgrades catch up faster" was cut: no cited PR measures an upgrade duration, so the entry claims only the mechanism. - **Not a Bug Fix.** 0dt upgrades completed on v26.47.0; the catch-up reboots merely collected backoff delay. Existing behavior improved, so Improvements. - **Residual, deliberately unpublished.** A stale read-only process in a replaced pod still restarts in place on these halts until the kubelet kills its container, competing with its replacement for the generation's replicas. The `MZ_RESTARTED_IN_PLACE` marker check keeps it from booting writable, so it cannot fence the leader — the failure #40061 reverted. Worth watching if 0dt reports look odd after this ships. ### rc.2 increment — empty, by design rc.2's commit is empty: no entry was published and the provisional dates did not move. It exists so later runs can see from the commit subject that rc.2 was applied. Its single materialize PR, #40189, is the open item discussed under the `final` increment above. ### rc.1 — standing warnings⚠️ **Seven PRs in rc.1's tracking issue were already covered by the v26.47.0 train, and none is republished here.** v26.47.0 took five RCs whose later ones were cherry-picks onto the release branch; the same PRs appear in this issue because they are also what landed on `main` for v26.48.0. Four of the seven **shipped to Cloud in v26.47.0 on 2026-10-22** — #37653, #39910, #39927, #40036 — so republishing any of them would put duplicate text in front of customers eight days later. The other three (#39903, #39906, #40046) were held at Borderline in v26.47.0 and are held again here, each reason re-checked rather than inherited. The "snapshots are disjoint by construction" guarantee holds *within* a train, not across trains, so this was caught mechanically by grepping every PR number in the issue against the v26.47.0 snapshot directories. All seven are listed under their own heading in `rc.1/omitted.md`. **Open questions for the release owner** - **Upsert v2** (#40189, rc.2) — see the `final` increment above. The rollout statement on this branch has changed the picture since rc.2; this is the one item that needs a decision before merge. - **MCP protocol revision 2026-07-28** (#39698, #39702, #39703, #39759, #39761) — the stack is complete and `enable_mcp_protocol_2026_07_28` still defaults to **`false`** at the ship tag. Omitted, with the absence of any MCP text on this branch taken as confirmation. Drafted wording remains in `rc.1/omitted.md` if the flag flips. - **Redesigned cluster details page in the Console** (#39446, #39507, #39508, #39510, #39607) — omitted for the same reason. Note that the Improvements section does carry **"New cluster details page on Self-Managed"**, added by hand, which links the v26.47 section rather than re-describing the page. - **Schema projection on the Console's Freshness page** (#40031) — a genuine new way to diagnose lag, but the author states the whole Freshness page "is currently behind a feature flag that is only enabled for certain customers in impersonation mode". **Is the page generally reachable yet?** This is the same page v26.47.0 held for the same reason. - **Time zone data 2026e timing** (#40045) — the author flags the Canadian zone changes as effective **2026-11-01**, three days after the Cloud date. Tight, but it holds. *Resolved since rc.1: the Kafka sink headers framing question — the GA section on this branch answers it.* **Verification notes** — rc.1's Step 5 pass cut one drafted entry and rewrote four: - **Cut**: a Bug Fix drafted for #40032 ("halt with exit code 168 when a live reader loses its lease"). The PR's own Problem section is about alerting — `mz_persist_lease_timeout_read` cannot distinguish a dead reader from a stuck one — and the follow-up it names is a Cloud alerting change. Nothing a customer observes changes. - **tzdata** (#40045): the draft said the Canadian zones move to "permanent daylight saving time", the author's prose. The PR's data table shows a permanent **−05/EST** and **−06/CST** — summer *offsets* kept year-round, but with another zone's standard-time *abbreviations*, which is what a user sees from `AT TIME ZONE`. Reworded to what the table supports. - **Hydration memory** (#39923): scoped to the consolidation step and the measured outcome (~628 GiB peak, no restart, against every pre-change run exiting on the 849 GiB limit). The PR explicitly says the fix "covers this consolidation path, not the sink's whole footprint"; [CPU-317](https://linear.app/materializeinc/issue/CPU-317) tracks the rest. - **Kafka clients** (#40026): "55 to 24" is measured on a 4-worker, 11-source setup. The CPU throttling and degraded freshness are observed symptoms of the *old* behavior at a few hundred sources, not a measured post-change result at that scale, so the entry states the count as the outcome and the throttling as what the count drove. - **`environmentd` accept backlog** (#40035): the author's hedge is kept — "less likely to be restarted", not eliminated, because the PR says "This makes the queue fill later, not never." **Judgment calls a reviewer may want to revisit** — #39605 is filed as an **Improvement**, not a Bug Fix: nothing was incorrect, an unbounded operation gained a bound and a knob. #40101 is filed as a **Bug Fix** rather than omitted under the internal-logging rule, because credentials reaching the logs is a security defect with a user-visible remedy; only credentials a user inlined rather than wrapped in a `SECRET` were affected. Snapshot drafts (with PR links) in mz-skills: - rc.1: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/omitted.md) - rc.2: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/omitted.md) - rc.3: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.3/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.3/omitted.md) - final: [release_notes.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/final/release_notes.md) / [omitted.md](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/final/omitted.md) **Borderline PRs omitted:** rc.1: 12 — [omitted.md#borderline](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.1/omitted.md#borderline), rc.2: 1 — [omitted.md#borderline](https://github.com/MaterializeInc/mz-skills/blob/main/data/mz-release-notes/v26.48.0/rc.2/omitted.md#borderline), rc.3: 0, final: 0 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Valerie Chiang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pranshu Maheshwari <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Pranshu Maheshwari <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a since jump crosses 32 or more distinct buffered times,
CorrectionV2::consolidate_beforecollected every update below the upper into one ownedVec, sorted it, and built a chain from it. That puts the whole buffer on the heap as owned rows, regardless of how much of it the buffer pool had spilled.A hydrating MV sink hits this when its first batch lands. Once the batch is appended, the since jumps across all times buffered while the snapshot was written. On staging, the first hydration of a lineitem ×4 MV at TPC-H scale factor 100 on an M.1-2xlarge replica grew its swap from 300 GiB to over 700 GiB in this path and exited on the replica's 849 GiB limit. The sync and the async MV sink both failed this way. The heap profile put about 98% of the workers' heap in
consolidate_before'sVec::from_iter, mostlyRowRef::to_owned.sort_advancednow works like a merge batcher. It accumulates up to 2^16 updates on the heap and consolidates them when full. A run that consolidation leaves at most half full keeps accumulating, so updates that cancel on the heap mint no chunks. Otherwise it is minted as a chain whose chunks can spill, and merged into its predecessors while it holds at least half as many updates, which keeps the number of chains logarithmic and cancels updates at the first merge that brings them together. Input chains are read by value, so each chunk is dropped and its pool slot freed right after it is copied out. Merged runs are written one generation deeper than their inputs, so the pool can compress the runs waiting for the final merge. The change addssort_advanced_consolidates_across_runs,sort_advanced_matches_one_sort,sort_advanced_matches_one_sort_through_poolandsort_advanced_cancels_to_nothing.This PR's code, built alone on main, ran the same first hydration on staging with the async MV sink and a TPC-H source ticking every second. No run restarted:
Without the change, every combination of sink, node type and spill setting exited on the limit and finished only after recovering, for example 5833 s on r8gd with spill on. An earlier version of this PR, with runs of 2^20 updates and input chunks kept until their chain was read, took 4968 to 9679 s across the same four cells and peaked at 695 to 798 GiB. The four extra merge levels of 2^16 runs did not show in the hydration time. With the sync sink and 2^16 runs, keeping input chunks peaked at 734 GiB on r6gd, and freeing them peaked at 628 GiB on r8gd, the same as all four runs above. That points to freeing input chunks for most of the lower peak. The run with the nodes swapped is still running.
The fix covers this consolidation path, not the sink's whole footprint. Usage still grows by roughly the snapshot's size after the snapshot write, which leaves about 220 GiB of headroom at this shape. How much
sort_advancedhas to re-sort depends on how the buffered updates spread over times when the since jumps, which differs between a new hydration, a restart after downtime and a 0dt deployment. CPU-317 tracks measuring that spread and merging the already sorted per-time runs instead of re-sorting them, and a wider merge fan-in would cut the remaining write amplification of the binary merge stack.🤖 Generated with Claude Code