Thanks @ong6 ! As you are trying to spruce up the content for this section, and we haven't discussed this yet in an issue, but I have a slight idea for wording improvement that I have mentioned below (all devs/maintainers, please suggest if this is a related change. If unrelated I can rescind it).

In any case, I have some things that I commented on below:

Thanks for the follow up! Here are some reviews that we can work on:

Thanks for the further work! My reviews are down below.

I see a quite an amount of changes which are just stylistic to the raw but do not affect the display (like making one line into two, changing unordered list notation from * to -, etc.). Sometimes some of these changes make the raw less clean, e.g. like cramming text that follows after <br> into the same line as the preceding text. We can let the stylistic choice be as is to the original for sections that do not get added/modified, and focus on the content that can be added/modified to the documentations.

Just a couple nits left, and we're good to go after this :)

One last minor nit and we're good to merge!

LGTM! 🎉

LGTM