Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@LizardByte-bot
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (54d0d87) to head (30d4600).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #141   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          174       174           
=========================================
  Hits           174       174           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
action/main.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher force-pushed the bot/update-files-from-global-repo branch from db20b4a to b113d9a Compare April 25, 2025 23:44
@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher force-pushed the bot/update-files-from-global-repo branch from b113d9a to 30d4600 Compare April 25, 2025 23:47
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher requested a review from Copilot April 25, 2025 23:51
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates global workflows by refining error messages and standardizing workflow definitions across the repository. Key changes include updating token permission guidance in action/main.py, adjusting YAML syntax and permissions in several GitHub Actions workflows, and refining the CodeQL matrix generation logic.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
action/main.py Updated error message to include additional token permission instructions.
.github/workflows/issues.yml Standardized event type definitions and updated workflow comments.
.github/workflows/common-lint.yml Updated the clang-format lint action version, added permissions, and reformatted event triggers.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Refined matrix generation logic, added a checkout step, and updated action parameter usage.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Added a permissions block and standardized branches and event trigger definitions.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

.github/workflows/common-lint.yml:89

  • Verify that 'clangFormatVersion: "20"' is supported by DoozyX/[email protected], ensuring compatibility with the new action version.
clangFormatVersion: '20'

.github/workflows/ci.yml:3

  • Confirm that elevating permissions to 'contents: write' in this workflow aligns with the repository's security model.
permissions:
  contents: write

.github/workflows/codeql.yml:107

  • Ensure that constructing the category string by splitting the OS name yields the correct identifier for all expected OS variants.
category = `/language:cpp-${os.split('-')[0]}`

@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher merged commit 73c4754 into master Apr 25, 2025
14 checks passed
@ReenigneArcher ReenigneArcher deleted the bot/update-files-from-global-repo branch April 25, 2025 23:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants