Skip to content

Comments

fix 'for' loop problem (https://github.com/tiann/KernelSU/pull/2745)#772

Merged
rifsxd merged 1 commit intoKernelSU-Next:nextfrom
pershoot:next_STAGE2
Sep 5, 2025
Merged

fix 'for' loop problem (https://github.com/tiann/KernelSU/pull/2745)#772
rifsxd merged 1 commit intoKernelSU-Next:nextfrom
pershoot:next_STAGE2

Conversation

@pershoot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pershoot pershoot commented Sep 5, 2025

fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode

fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode
@pershoot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pershoot commented Sep 5, 2025

Builds fine and switched to Kprobes to validate:

dmesg | grep -i kprobe

[ 0.462906] KernelSU: sucompat: register___arm64_sys_execve kprobe: 0
[ 0.463247] KernelSU: sucompat: register___arm64_sys_faccessat kprobe: 0
[ 0.463379] KernelSU: sucompat: register___arm64_sys_newfstatat kprobe: 0
[ 0.463570] KernelSU: sucompat: register_pts_unix98_lookup kprobe: 0
[ 1.847839] KernelSU: unregister vfs_read kprobe: 1!
[ 4.065006] KernelSU: unregister input kprobe: 1!
[ 4.661542] KernelSU: unregister execve kprobe: 1!
[ 6.335141] susfs:[0][1435][susfs_sus_su] core kprobe hooks for ksu are disabled!
[ 6.335152] susfs:[0][1435][susfs_sus_su] non-kprobe hook sus_su is enabled!

@rifsxd rifsxd merged commit 5bdb938 into KernelSU-Next:next Sep 5, 2025
20 checks passed
@pershoot pershoot deleted the next_STAGE2 branch September 5, 2025 20:03
sidex15 pushed a commit to sidex15/KernelSU-Next that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2025
fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode

Co-authored-by: nobody202222 <[email protected]>
xvergilantte pushed a commit to xvergilantte/KernelSU-Next that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode

Co-authored-by: nobody202222 <[email protected]>
xvergilantte pushed a commit to xvergilantte/KernelSU-Next that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2025
fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode

Co-authored-by: nobody202222 <[email protected]>
Sliva4 pushed a commit to Sliva4/KernelSU-Next that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
fix ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in c99 or c11 mode

Co-authored-by: nobody202222 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants