Make libsecp256k1 tests optional #720
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AdamISZ
reviewed
Oct 31, 2020
They are expensive and slow, especially on a slow hardware like Raspberry Pi.
Member
|
utACK feel free to merge if you've tested it. |
Member
Author
|
Yes, I did test myself before opening PR, of course. |
Contributor
|
Tested and works great. Makes installing JM on an RPi4 much faster. |
openoms
added a commit
to openoms/joininbox
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
They are expensive and slow, especially on a slow hardware like
Raspberry Pi.
Inspired by bitcoin/bitcoin#20264.