Conversation
Source is PKG now
|
We were talking about this on Slack.. I personally prefer we make a new label, I'd like to hear some opinions. |
|
I'd have to agree with @acodega, create a fresh label rather than modifying the existing one. |
|
More or less agree, and I feel the pain. But … The main function of installomator is providing the latest/greatest application version. With that in mind my 2 cents. We cannot be responsible for a decision a developper makes I guess? I think we have see this in the past that, by the nature of how installomator works, you are forged to adopt a new version if the program fundamentally changes without a broken label. Everybody with the need of Privileges is (should be) acting right now: Disable Installomator and providing a self made PKG to their fleet if they have the need for v1.x, or implementing v2 and move on. If we make 2 labels, when are we getting rid of the original label? Or infusing it into one label (alias)? At that point we'll have the same discussion. |
|
There is precedent to consider, there are several other apps with multiple major version based labels in Installomator, so in this instance, the idea of another label for the version upgrade is consistent with existing Installomator labels. |
|
We've done this with other apps when it fundamentally changes in a new version. 1Password is an example. An app like Slack keeps on rolling from version 3 to 4. You don't need to change how you deploy Slack. You do with Privileges. I recommend that the Privileges label should be changed so it doesn't grab |
|
I'm going to close this but please feel free to reopen it if needed or open a new PR for |
Installer is changed from .zip to .pkg