While testing ACT meta related test cases, multiple rules are triggered for the same element with the issue.
I do not think this second rule should also trigger a Needs Review against the same element.

Checker rules

• meta_redirect_optional is mapping to the ACT rule bisz58.
• meta_refresh_delay is mapping to the ACT rule bc659a.

ACT rule bisz58 Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception) with 3 failed test cases:

Failed examples should be failed by at least one of the Checker rules fail reason codes.

• Failed Example 1
  • Rule ID: meta_redirect_optional Reason ID: fail Violation
  • Rule ID: meta_refresh_delay Reason ID: potential_refresh Needs Review I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.
• Failed Example 2
  • Rule ID: meta_redirect_optional Reason ID: fail_longrefresh Violation
  • Rule ID: meta_refresh_delay Reason ID: potential_refresh Needs Review I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.
• Failed Example 3
  • Rule ID: meta_redirect_optional Reason ID: fail_longrefresh Violation
  • Rule ID: meta_refresh_delay Reason ID: potential_refresh Needs Review I do not think this second rule should also trigger against the same element.

ACT rule bc659a Meta element has no refresh delay with failed test cases:

• Failed Example 1
• Failed Example 2
• Failed Example 3
• Failed Example 4