Skip to content

feat(producer): add sync pool for channel reuse#3109

Merged
dnwe merged 4 commits intoIBM:mainfrom
kasimtj:feature/sync-pool-for-expectation-channels-reuse
Mar 2, 2025
Merged

feat(producer): add sync pool for channel reuse#3109
dnwe merged 4 commits intoIBM:mainfrom
kasimtj:feature/sync-pool-for-expectation-channels-reuse

Conversation

@kasimtj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kasimtj kasimtj commented Feb 27, 2025

Fix for this issue #3107

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@puellanivis puellanivis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That the only thing I can find to comment about is a variable name says good things for the PR. 😉

@kasimtj kasimtj force-pushed the feature/sync-pool-for-expectation-channels-reuse branch from fa2d663 to 6d63ab0 Compare February 27, 2025 11:09
@kasimtj kasimtj requested a review from puellanivis February 28, 2025 14:42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@puellanivis puellanivis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can see nothing worth commenting about.

@kasimtj
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

kasimtj commented Feb 28, 2025

I can see nothing worth commenting about.

should i tag maintainers for a review or just wait for someone?

@dnwe dnwe changed the title Feature/sync pool for expectation channels reuse feat(producer): add sync pool for channel reuse Mar 2, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@dnwe dnwe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR and issue/benchmark comparison. Changed look good to me, approved

@dnwe dnwe merged commit c2e0d94 into IBM:main Mar 2, 2025
16 checks passed
@dnwe dnwe added the feat label Mar 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants