Skip to content

Conversation

@makseq
Copy link
Member

@makseq makseq commented Nov 25, 2025

If you already have a running Redis instance, it will be used automatically in the open source LS. This leads to stuck jobs because OSS does not have RQ workers. It happened after we upgrade django-rq library to 2.10.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e3af379
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/6925bb35a6b698000830e5dc

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e3af379
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/heartex-docs/deploys/6925bb35e7e8c4000822dc85

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-storybook canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e3af379
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-storybook/deploys/6925bb351b75250008f51c58

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Nov 25, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-playground canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e3af379
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-playground/deploys/6925bb3508e5a500089b8126

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.04%. Comparing base (7c020c9) to head (e3af379).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
label_studio/core/redis.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop    #8884       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    66.30%   81.04%   +14.74%     
============================================
  Files          820      259      -561     
  Lines        64425    23594    -40831     
  Branches     11023        0    -11023     
============================================
- Hits         42716    19122    -23594     
+ Misses       21705     4472    -17233     
+ Partials         4        0        -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
lsf-e2e ?
lsf-integration ?
lsf-unit ?
pytests 81.04% <80.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@makseq makseq merged commit c7d2e30 into develop Nov 25, 2025
53 checks passed
@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex deleted the fb-bros-642 branch November 25, 2025 15:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants