Skip to content

Conversation

@nass600
Copy link
Contributor

@nass600 nass600 commented Jul 15, 2025

Fixed submitting annotations that should not due to its parent visibility

Before:

conditional-choices-submit-before.mov

After:

conditional-choices-submit-after.mov

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c1fb078
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/68769cce27479b0007b3f47c

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-playground canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c1fb078
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-playground/deploys/68769cce3c19530008292b87

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-storybook canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c1fb078
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-storybook/deploys/68769cce34328900084a1668

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Jul 15, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c1fb078
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/heartex-docs/deploys/68769cced9142c0008fdbc20

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.90%. Comparing base (2579a76) to head (c1fb078).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #7982      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    69.49%   64.90%   -4.60%     
===========================================
  Files          712      503     -209     
  Lines        50159    33381   -16778     
  Branches      8583     8583              
===========================================
- Hits         34860    21667   -13193     
+ Misses       15296    11711    -3585     
  Partials         3        3              
Flag Coverage Δ
lsf-e2e 59.79% <ø> (ø)
lsf-integration 54.43% <ø> (ø)
lsf-unit 8.38% <ø> (ø)
pytests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nass600 nass600 requested a review from a team July 15, 2025 10:08
@nass600
Copy link
Contributor Author

nass600 commented Jul 15, 2025

/git merge

Workflow run
Successfully merged: 19 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 335 deletions(-)

@nass600
Copy link
Contributor Author

nass600 commented Jul 15, 2025

/git merge

Workflow run
Successfully merged: 1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that TextArea just doesn't use VisibilityMixin. I think that might be a proper fix. Can you try it?
This mixin already checks for parent's visibility

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmm, but your solution would work for all classification controls. Also I was concerned about check for required controls, which uses visibility params. But I checked and it actually works well, so the only thing to fix is serialization. And your solution covers it well! Approving.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good point @hlomzik , thanks!

@nass600
Copy link
Contributor Author

nass600 commented Jul 15, 2025

/git merge

Workflow run
Successfully merged: 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex merged commit 2867797 into develop Jul 15, 2025
45 of 46 checks passed
@robot-ci-heartex robot-ci-heartex deleted the fb-utc-168 branch July 15, 2025 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants