-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.2k
osquery 1.7.2 #50362
osquery 1.7.2 #50362
Conversation
|
Failed to build on all three platforms, which is interesting because #50132 didn't fail a few days ago. Hmm. Thoughts on that @theopolis & @ilovezfs? |
|
@DomT4 @theopolis This is why #50132 includes cpp-netlib 0.12.0-rc1 as well. Also, 1.7.2 is pre-release for 1.8.0, which is why #50132 has it in devel. Cf. osquery/osquery#1920 as noted in the commit message of #50132 @DomT4 Hence, #50132 (comment) |
|
@theopolis Is 1.7.2 correct for Homebrew :stable despite the note at https://github.com/facebook/osquery/releases? I don't personally object to moving it to :stable but wasn't sure based on that note. |
|
You can mark it :stable, I keep pre-release for a 24/48 hour period while I deploy and test on a larger scale than 3 build hosts. :) I will update that note and remove the checkbox later tonight, as well as fill in the release notes. |
|
@theopolis Thanks! I'll close #50132 in favor of this PR and one just bumping cpp-netlib. |
|
@DomT4 @theopolis if #50375 is merged first and then CI retriggered here, this should pass. |
|
It would be unusual for us to land a -rc version (of cpp-netlib) in stable. The last netlib candidate was tagged about two weeks ago. Can you ask them if they're ready to release? |
|
👍 on Tim's comment. |
|
A non RC release is a question for @deanberris. From the OS X client perspective I've tested on 10 thousand+ machines and everything is working ok. Also keep in mind, in Homebrew osquery is the only forward dependency. Alternatively, @ilovezfs, can you mark 1.7.2 as dependent on the :devel cpp-netlib? If it seems there's blockage we can forgo adding 1.7.2 for now. |
At present we don't support mandating people install |
|
@DomT4 Unless you want to merge 0.12.0-rc1 as stable (which would be my recommendation, whence the PR), maybe 0.12.0-rc1 should be vendored into this formula? |
|
It'd be nice to at least ask upstream if they're ready to go stable yet before we start jumping around alternatives. |
|
Upstream has responded:
@DomT4 @tdsmith So sounds like merging #50375 as |
|
@ilovezfs I may have an alternative. Technically osquery is API compatible with 0.11 but CMake expects 0.12, thankfully without forcing an exception otherwise. If we add the correct linker flags in the brew formula we can build 1.7.2+ with 0.11. Give me a few to play around with the build. |
|
@theopolis Cool, thanks |
|
@ilovezfs That sounds like a reason to wait for a release to me :) Sorry to be a stick in the mud; glad there's a workaround to try. |
|
RC2 which will then become final is now in the works here: cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib#622 |
|
#50375 updated with 0.12.0-rc2 |
|
I'm sure this is already known to @theopolis but same issue for 1.7.3 Any reason not to just rename this PR and update with the 1.7.3 tag and revision? |
All Submissions: