Repository navigation
Conversation
…pache#50694 (apache#50887) Cherry-picked from apache#50694 Co-authored-by: airborne12 <[email protected]>
…te, it will trigger one fewer task execution apache#50624 (apache#50897) Cherry-picked from apache#50624 Co-authored-by: zhangdong <[email protected]>
…rk conjuncts apache#50886 (apache#50955) Cherry-picked from apache#50886 Co-authored-by: morrySnow <[email protected]>
…age policy apache#50830 (apache#50856) Cherry-picked from apache#50830 Co-authored-by: Luwei <[email protected]>
apache#50921) Cherry-picked from apache#50864 Co-authored-by: Socrates <[email protected]>
…pache#50928) Cherry-picked from apache#50901 Co-authored-by: zy-kkk <[email protected]>
…apache#50850, apache#50337 (apache#50874) cherry pick from apache#50850, apache#50337 --------- Co-authored-by: Uniqueyou <[email protected]>
…chema could not be displayed apache#49607 (apache#50878) Cherry-picked from apache#49607 Co-authored-by: shee <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: garenshi <[email protected]>
…sks each round apache#49547 (apache#50991) Cherry-picked from apache#49547 Co-authored-by: Luwei <[email protected]>
…e '$.name\\k' (apache#50930) cherry-pick from apache#50859
…age concurrent restore tasks apache#50740 (apache#50845) Cherry-picked from apache#50740 --------- Co-authored-by: walter <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: wubiao02 <[email protected]>
(apache#51006) Cherry-picked from apache#49881 Co-authored-by: feiniaofeiafei <[email protected]>
…che#44010) (apache#51007) * Add `-XX:+PrintClassHistogramAfterFullGC` for JAVA_OPTS * Add `classhisto*=trace` for JAVA_OPTS_FOR_JDK_17 fe.gc.log will print like this: ``` 2024-11-15T11:49:00.316+0800: 11.346: [Class Histogram (after full gc): num #instances #bytes class name ---------------------------------------------- 1: 7464 7053464 [B 2: 37465 3656360 [C 3: 7076 2909880 [Ljava.lang.Object; 4: 4915 2306872 [I 5: 9167 1719552 [S 6: 16229 1168488 io.grpc.netty.shaded.io.netty.buffer.PoolSubpage ...... ``` ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [x] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [x] Previous test can cover this change. - [x] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
…_insert apache#50986 (apache#51021) Cherry-picked from apache#50986 Co-authored-by: camby <[email protected]>
apache#51065 (apache#51083) Cherry-picked from apache#51065 Co-authored-by: zgxme <[email protected]>
…apache#48963) (apache#49286) pick apache#48963 Part IV of apache#48511 doc apache/doris-website#2196 **Introduce routine load job statistic system table:** ``` mysql> show create table information_schema.routine_load_job\G *************************** 1. row *************************** Table: routine_load_job Create Table: CREATE TABLE `routine_load_job` ( `JOB_ID` text NULL, `JOB_NAME` text NULL, `CREATE_TIME` text NULL, `PAUSE_TIME` text NULL, `END_TIME` text NULL, `DB_NAME` text NULL, `TABLE_NAME` text NULL, `STATE` text NULL, `CURRENT_TASK_NUM` text NULL, `JOB_PROPERTIES` text NULL, `DATA_SOURCE_PROPERTIES` text NULL, `CUSTOM_PROPERTIES` text NULL, `STATISTIC` text NULL, `PROGRESS` text NULL, `LAG` text NULL, `REASON_OF_STATE_CHANGED` text NULL, `ERROR_LOG_URLS` text NULL, `USER_NAME` text NULL, `CURRENT_ABORT_TASK_NUM` int NULL, `IS_ABNORMAL_PAUSE` boolean NULL ) ENGINE=SCHEMA; 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ``` **There are some benefits to empower job with SQL query capability for statistical information:** - It can be used in conjunction with metrics add through apache#48209 to roughly locate abnormal jobs when Grafana alarms, and the following SQL can be used: ``` SELECT JOB_NAME FROM information_schema.routine_load_job_statistics WHERE CURRENT_ABORT_TASK_NUM > 0 OR IS_ABNORMAL_PAUSE = TRUE; ``` - User can use the `select * from information_schema.routine_load_job` instead of the `show routine load`. The advantage is that the `show routine load` can only be searched by name, but SQL can be very flexible in locating jobs ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
…_flags (apache#50993) (apache#51089) Pick apache#50993 Introduced by apache#51050 The build block maybe be `clear_column_mem_not_keep` in build phase when the operator is closed. ```cpp Status HashJoinBuildSinkLocalState::close(RuntimeState* state, Status exec_status) { if (_closed) { return Status::OK(); } auto& p = _parent->cast<HashJoinBuildSinkOperatorX>(); Defer defer {[&]() { if (!_should_build_hash_table) { return; } // The build side hash key column maybe no need output, but we need to keep the column in block // because it is used to compare with probe side hash key column if (p._should_keep_hash_key_column && _build_col_ids.size() == 1) { p._should_keep_column_flags[_build_col_ids[0]] = true; } if (_shared_state->build_block) { // release the memory of unused column in probe stage _shared_state->build_block->clear_column_mem_not_keep(p._should_keep_column_flags, p._use_shared_hash_table); } if (p._use_shared_hash_table) { std::unique_lock lock(p._mutex); p._signaled = true; for (auto& dep : _shared_state->sink_deps) { dep->set_ready(); } for (auto& dep : p._finish_dependencies) { dep->set_ready(); } } }}; ``` ``` *** Aborted at 1747343165 (unix time) try "date -d @1747343165" if you are using GNU date *** *** Current BE git commitID: e7a3e78 *** *** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x1) received by PID 7474 (TID 9641 OR 0x7f3f8c0e5640) from PID 1; stack trace: *** 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /root/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:421 1# PosixSignals::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) [clone .part.0] in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so 2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64/lib/server/libjvm.so 3# 0x00007F4368F76520 in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 4# doris::Status doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>::finish_probing > > >(doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >&, doris::vectorized::MutableBlock&, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*, bool) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/join/process_hash_table_probe_impl.h:738 5# std::__detail::__variant::__gen_vtable_impl (*)(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&)>, std::integer_sequence >::__visit_invoke(doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const::$_1&&, std::variant > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodOneNumber, doris::JoinHashTable, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed > >, doris::vectorized::MethodKeysFixed, HashCRC32 > > >, doris::vectorized::MethodStringNoCache > > >&, std::variant, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<2>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<8>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<1>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<4>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<3>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<7>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<9>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<10>, doris::pipeline::ProcessHashTableProbe<11> >&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/variant:1013 6# doris::pipeline::HashJoinProbeOperatorX::pull(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) const at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/hashjoin_probe_operator.cpp:281 7# doris::pipeline::StatefulOperatorX::get_block(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:670 8# doris::pipeline::OperatorXBase::get_block_after_projects(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool*) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/exec/operator.cpp:381 9# doris::pipeline::PipelineTask::execute(bool*) in /mnt/hdd01/ci/doris-deploy-master-local/be/lib/doris_be 10# doris::pipeline::TaskScheduler::_do_work(int) at /root/doris/be/src/pipeline/task_scheduler.cpp:144 11# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at /root/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:622 12# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /root/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:469 13# start_thread at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:442 14# 0x00007F436905A850 at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:83 ``` Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: None - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into --> ### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #xxx Problem Summary: ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
…ETIMEV2 apache#50237 (apache#50905) Cherry-picked from apache#50237 Co-authored-by: Uniqueyou <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at [email protected] by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...