Conversation
Bumps [mockito-core](https://github.com/mockito/mockito) from 4.3.1 to 4.4.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/mockito/mockito/releases) - [Commits](mockito/mockito@v4.3.1...v4.4.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: org.mockito:mockito-core dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Open RedirectClick here to find a Open Redirect training lab DescriptionOpen Redirects, otherwise known as Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards, are a class of vulnerability made possible when a web application, comprised of insufficient input-validation controls, is manipulated into redirecting unwitting users of the application to a malicious, attacker-controlled URL. This type of exploit is popular with criminals involved in phishing and credential theft, unsurprising given the false layer of trust attributed to the fact that the modified link and the original site share the same server name. Read moreImpactThere are many overlapping techniques criminals employ to dupe unwitting victims into handing over their hard-earned cash. One of these methods is undoubtedly betting on the misplaced trust many of us place in familiar server names. This write-up exemplifies how even the most arguably well-known URL of all, In addition, Open Redirect vulnerabilities can:
ScenariosAs outlined above, attackers often use this attack as it 'hijacks' the trust users place in a well-known URL. Here's a topical example from 2021; if the target domain is Attackers send links like the one above in phishing campaigns in the hopes that they will lure a victim into clicking on the link. PreventionThe following measures can be applied to either eliminate or drastically reduce the potential for Open Redirect exploitation:
TestingVerify that URL redirects and forwards only allow destinations which appear on an allow list, or show a warning when redirecting to potentially untrusted content.
|
Micro-Learning Topic: Unvalidated redirect (Detected by phrase)Matched on "Unvalidated Redirect"This vulnerability refers to the ability of an attacker to arbitrarily perform a redirection (external) or forward (internal) against the system. It arises due to insufficient validation or sanitisation of inputs used to perform a redirect or forward and may result in privilege escalation (in the case of a forward) or may be used to launch phishing attacks against users (in the case of redirects). Try this challenge in Secure Code WarriorMicro-Learning Topic: Open redirect (Detected by phrase)Matched on "Open Redirect"This vulnerability refers to the ability of an attacker to arbitrarily perform a redirection (external) or forward (internal) against the system. It arises due to insufficient validation or sanitisation of inputs used to perform a redirect or forward and may result in privilege escalation (in the case of a forward) or may be used to launch phishing attacks against users (in the case of redirects). Try this challenge in Secure Code WarriorMicro-Learning Topic: Cross-site scripting (Detected by phrase)Matched on "XSS"Reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities occur when unescaped input is displayed in the resulting page displayed to the user. When HTML or script is included in the input, it will be processed by a user's browser as HTML or script and can alter the appearance of the page or execute malicious scripts in their user context. Try this challenge in Secure Code WarriorMicro-Learning Topic: Server-side request forgery (Detected by phrase)Matched on "Server-Side Request Forgery"Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities are caused when an attacker can supply or modify a URL that reads or sends data to the server. The attacker can create a malicious request with a manipulated URL, when this request reaches the server, the server-side code executes the exploit URL causing the attacker to be able to read data from services that shouldn't be exposed. Try this challenge in Secure Code Warrior |

Bumps mockito-core from 4.3.1 to 4.4.0.
Release notes
Sourced from mockito-core's releases.
Commits
813add0Bump groovy from 3.0.9 to 3.0.10 (#2586)b4faa4aBump google-java-format from 1.14.0 to 1.15.0 (#2585)d832c63Bump actions/checkout from 2.4.0 to 3 (#2582)fb8aedfBump biz.aQute.bnd.builder from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 (#2579)c0fa718Bump shipkit-auto-version from 1.1.19 to 1.1.20 (#2580)8882827Bump biz.aQute.bnd.gradle from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 (#2578)6ccc121Fix running Google Java Format on JDK17 (#2572)50d7e71Clean up JUnit3 references (#2570)02d6356Fixes #2548: make InOrder able to verify static methods (#2549)e0a25cbBump com.diffplug.spotless from 6.2.2 to 6.3.0 (#2567)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot mergewill merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and mergewill squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel mergewill cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopenwill reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot closewill close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)