docs(security): Enhance FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with doc map, ISMS alignment, control mappings, and budget planning by Copilot · Pull Request #401 · Hack23/riksdagsmonitor

Copilot · 2026-02-20T18:13:56Z

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>🚀 FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md — Add Doc Map, ISMS Alignment, Control Mappings, Budget Planning</issue_title>
<issue_description>## 📋 Issue Type
🔒 Security Documentation

🎯 Objective

Enhance FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with missing structural elements: Architecture Documentation Map, ISMS Policy Alignment, per-enhancement control mappings, budget/resource planning, and Document Control footer with compliance badges.

⚠️ Scope: This issue ONLY modifies FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md. No other files are touched. This enables parallel execution with other per-document issues.

📌 Supersedes: #380 (closed — restructured to avoid merge conflicts)

📊 Current State Analysis

File: FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md (696 lines, ~30KB)
Reference: CIA (~800 lines, ~42KB) · Black Trigram (~1,500 lines, ~74KB)

✅ Already has: Centered Hack23 logo, badge-style metadata, subtitle, 6 Mermaid diagrams, roadmap phases

🔍 Missing Elements

Element	🏛️ CIA	🎮 BT	📊 Riksdagsmonitor
📚 Architecture Documentation Map	✅	✅	❌ Missing
🔐 ISMS Policy Alignment	✅	✅	❌ Missing
📄 Related Documents Table	✅	✅	❌ Missing
📋 Per-Enhancement Control Mappings	✅	✅	⚠️ Per domain only
💰 Budget & Resource Planning	✅	✅	❌ Missing
📈 Compliance Evolution Details	✅	✅	⚠️ Minimal
📊 Detailed Phase Milestones	⚠️	✅	⚠️ Basic
📄 Document Control Footer	✅	✅	❌ Missing

🚀 Required Changes

1️⃣ Add Architecture Documentation Map

Add ## 📚 Architecture Documentation Map table with all 15 docs, current doc bolded.

2️⃣ Add ISMS Policy Alignment

Add ## 🔐 ISMS Policy Alignment section:

📋 Map future enhancements to Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC policies
🔗 Link to Information Security Policy, Secure Development Policy
📊 Security Control Implementation Status table

3️⃣ Expand Control Mappings

For each future enhancement, add specific control mappings:

🏛️ ISO 27001:2022 Annex A control references
🔄 NIST CSF 2.0 function mappings (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover)
🛡️ CIS Controls v8.1 safeguard references

4️⃣ Add Budget & Resource Planning

Add ## 💰 Security Investment & Budget:

📊 Per-phase cost estimates (even if approximate)
🧑‍💻 Resource requirements
📈 ROI projections

5️⃣ Expand Compliance Evolution

Add detailed per-control maturity progression:

📊 Current maturity level → Target maturity level
📅 Timeline for each maturity improvement
🏗️ Implementation milestones

6️⃣ Add Document Control Footer

---
<p align="center">
  <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/ISO_27001:2022-Compliant-blue?style=flat-square" alt="ISO 27001"/>
  <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/NIST_CSF_2.0-Aligned-green?style=flat-square" alt="NIST CSF"/>
  <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/CIS_Controls_v8.1-Implemented-orange?style=flat-square" alt="CIS Controls"/>
</p>

🤖 Recommended Agent

security-architect — Future security planning and compliance framework expertise

✅ Acceptance Criteria

📚 Architecture Documentation Map with all 15 docs (current bolded)
🔐 ISMS Policy Alignment section with ISMS-PUBLIC links
📋 Every future enhancement maps to ISO 27001/NIST CSF/CIS controls
💰 Budget/investment section present (estimates acceptable)
📈 Per-control maturity progression documented
📄 Document Control footer with compliance badges
📏 Depth comparable to reference implementations
⚠️ ONLY FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md is modified

📚 References

Resource	Link
🏛️ CIA Future Security Arch	https://github.com/Hack23/cia/blob/master/FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
🎮 BT Future Security Arch	https://github.com/Hack23/blacktrigram/blob/main/FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
📋 ISMS Policies	https://github.com/Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC

<agent_instructions>You are enhancing FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md. ONLY modify FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md — no other files. Reference CIA (https://github.com/Hack23/cia/blob/master/FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) and Black Trigram (https://github.com/Hack23/blacktrigram/blob/main/FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) as examples. Add Architecture Documentation Map table, ISMS Policy Alignment section, per-enhancement ISO 27001/NIST CSF/CIS Controls mappings, Budget/Resource Planning section, compliance evolution details, and Document Control footer with compliance badges. Preserve all existing content.</agent_instructions>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

Fixes 🚀 FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md — Add Doc Map, ISMS Alignment, Control Mappings, Budget Planning #388

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

… Control Mappings, Budget Planning Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

github-actions · 2026-02-20T20:53:46Z

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Category	Score	Status
Performance	85/100	🟡
Accessibility	95/100	🟢
Best Practices	90/100	🟢
SEO	95/100	🟢

📥 Download full Lighthouse report

Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via budget.json

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR enhances the FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md documentation by adding comprehensive structural elements that align it with reference implementations (CIA, Black Trigram). The enhancements include an architecture documentation map, ISMS policy alignment, detailed control mappings, compliance evolution roadmap, and budget planning - all critical elements for a mature security architecture document.

Changes:

Added Hack23 standard badge row to document header with Owner/Version/Effective Date/Review Cycle metadata
Added Architecture Documentation Map table listing all 15 architecture documents with the current document highlighted
Added ISMS Policy Alignment section with 8 Hack23/ISMS-PUBLIC policy references, Security Control Implementation Status, and NIST CSF 2.0 maturity progression
Added Per-Control Maturity Progression (§6.3) with 12 controls mapped to ISO 27001/NIST/CIS frameworks with timelines and milestones
Added CIS Controls v8.1 Implementation Roadmap (§6.4) tracking 12 controls from IG1 to IG3
Added Security Investment & Budget Planning section (§9) with per-phase cost estimates (€85K-€145K total), resource requirements, ROI projections, and cost optimization strategies
Expanded References section with additional ISMS policies, standards (NIS2, CRA, ISO 27001:2022), and related Hack23 repositories
Added Document Control footer with 5 compliance badges (ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF 2.0, CIS Controls v8.1, NIS2, GDPR)

Copilot · 2026-02-20T21:42:33Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md

+10. [Conclusion](#9-conclusion)
+11. [References](#references)


The table of contents numbering is incorrect. Section 9 in the ToC is listed as "Security Investment & Budget Planning" but the actual section heading at line 764 has no number (just "💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning"). Additionally, item 10 links to "#9-conclusion" which should be section 9, and item 11 links to "#references" which should be section 10. The Security Investment & Budget Planning section should be numbered as section 9, Conclusion should be section 10, and References should be section 11.

Suggested change

10. [Conclusion](#9-conclusion)

11. [References](#references)

10. [Conclusion](#10-conclusion)

11. [References](#11-references)

Copilot · 2026-02-20T21:42:34Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md


 ---

+## 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning


This section heading is missing its section number. According to the document structure, this should be "## 9. 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning" to match the table of contents and maintain proper sequential numbering (sections 1-8 precede this, and the current "9. Conclusion" should become section 10).

Suggested change

## 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning

## 9. 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning

Copilot · 2026-02-20T21:42:34Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md

+
+---
+
 ## 9. 🤝 Conclusion


This section number is incorrect. Since a new section 9 (Security Investment & Budget Planning) has been added, this section should be renumbered to "## 10. 🤝 Conclusion" to maintain proper sequential numbering.

Suggested change

## 9. 🤝 Conclusion

## 10. 🤝 Conclusion

Copilot · 2026-02-20T21:42:34Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md

+### Security Control Implementation Status
+
+| Control Domain | Current (2026) | Target (2028) | Target (2030) | Framework |
+|----------------|----------------|---------------|---------------|-----------|  


There is trailing whitespace at the end of this table header row. While this doesn't break functionality, removing trailing whitespace is a common markdown best practice for cleaner diffs and consistency.

Suggested change

|----------------|----------------|---------------|---------------|-----------|

|----------------|----------------|---------------|---------------|-----------|

pethers · 2026-02-20T22:45:43Z

@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread

…RITY_ARCHITECTURE.md Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

Copilot · 2026-02-20T23:00:50Z

@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread

Applied all four review suggestions in commit 53a770f:

ToC #9-conclusion → #10-conclusion
## 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning → ## 9. 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning
## 9. 🤝 Conclusion → ## 10. 🤝 Conclusion
Removed trailing whitespace from the table separator row at line 104

github-actions · 2026-02-20T23:08:57Z

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Category	Score	Status
Performance	85/100	🟡
Accessibility	95/100	🟢
Best Practices	90/100	🟢
SEO	95/100	🟢

📥 Download full Lighthouse report

Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via budget.json

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Copilot · 2026-02-20T23:10:56Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md

+| [FLOWCHART.md](FLOWCHART.md) | Current | Business process flows | ✅ Active |
+| [STATEDIAGRAM.md](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | Current | System state transitions | ✅ Active |
+| [MINDMAP.md](MINDMAP.md) | Current | System conceptual map | ✅ Active |
+| [SWOT.md](SWOT.md) | Current | Strategic analysis | ✅ Active |
+| [SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | Security | Current security controls | ✅ Active |
+| [THREAT_MODEL.md](THREAT_MODEL.md) | Security | STRIDE threat analysis | ✅ Active |
+| **[FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md)** | **Security** | **Future security roadmap (this document)** | **✅ Active** |
+| [FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md](FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md) | Future | Architecture evolution roadmap | ✅ Active |
+| [FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md](FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md) | Future | Enhanced data architecture | ✅ Active |
+| [FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md](FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md) | Future | Improved process workflows | ✅ Active |
+| [FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md](FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md) | Future | Advanced state management | ✅ Active |
+| [FUTURE_MINDMAP.md](FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) | Future | Capability expansion map | ✅ Active |
+| [FUTURE_SWOT.md](FUTURE_SWOT.md) | Future | Future strategic opportunities | ✅ Active |


pethers · 2026-02-20T23:16:21Z

@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread

…n format (Document|Focus|Description) Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

Copilot · 2026-02-20T23:21:25Z

@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread

Done in commit 89284ae — the Architecture Documentation Map table now uses the standard 3-column Document | Focus | Description format matching FLOWCHART.md and other architecture docs. The Status column is removed, and only the current document row (FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) is bolded.

github-actions · 2026-02-20T23:31:05Z

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Category	Score	Status
Performance	85/100	🟡
Accessibility	95/100	🟢
Best Practices	90/100	🟢
SEO	95/100	🟢

📥 Download full Lighthouse report

Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via budget.json

Copilot

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Copilot · 2026-02-20T23:34:17Z

FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md

 - [OWASP Application Security](https://owasp.org/)
 - [CIS Controls v8.1](https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/v8)
+- [NIST CSF 2.0](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
+- [ISO 27001:2022](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)


The link to ISO 27001:2022 points to "https://www.iso.org/standard/27001" which is not a valid ISO.org URL. The correct URL should be "https://www.iso.org/standard/27001.html" or the actual standard page URL "https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html" for ISO/IEC 27001:2022.

Suggested change

- [ISO 27001:2022](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)

- [ISO 27001:2022](https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html)

github-actions · 2026-02-21T00:07:58Z

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Category	Score	Status
Performance	85/100	🟡
Accessibility	95/100	🟢
Best Practices	90/100	🟢
SEO	95/100	🟢

📥 Download full Lighthouse report

Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via budget.json

Initial plan

ad37976

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and pethers Feb 20, 2026

Copilot started work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 19:00 View session

Enhance FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with Doc Map, ISMS Alignment,…

3b98337

… Control Mappings, Budget Planning Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

Copilot AI changed the title ~~[WIP] Enhance FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with structural elements~~ docs(security): Enhance FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with doc map, ISMS alignment, control mappings, and budget planning Feb 20, 2026

Copilot AI requested a review from pethers February 20, 2026 19:12

Copilot finished work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 19:12

github-actions bot added documentation Documentation updates security Security improvements isms ISMS compliance changes size-m Medium change (50-250 lines) labels Feb 20, 2026

pethers requested a review from Copilot February 20, 2026 21:38

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 21:39 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 22:56 View session

fix: correct section numbering and trailing whitespace in FUTURE_SECU…

53a770f

…RITY_ARCHITECTURE.md Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

Copilot finished work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 23:01

Merge branch 'main' into copilot/update-future-security-doc

688edf2

pethers requested a review from Copilot February 20, 2026 23:07

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 23:08 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 23:16 View session

fix: align Architecture Documentation Map table with standard 3-colum…

89284ae

…n format (Document|Focus|Description) Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>

Copilot finished work on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 23:22

pethers requested a review from Copilot February 20, 2026 23:29

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of pethers February 20, 2026 23:30 View session

Copilot AI reviewed Feb 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into copilot/update-future-security-doc

127ec44

pethers marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2026 00:06

pethers merged commit 2f56079 into main Feb 21, 2026
9 checks passed

pethers deleted the copilot/update-future-security-doc branch February 21, 2026 00:06

		10. [Conclusion](#9-conclusion)
		11. [References](#references)

	## 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning
	## 9. 💰 Security Investment & Budget Planning

	\|----------------\|----------------\|---------------\|---------------\|-----------\|
	\|----------------\|----------------\|---------------\|---------------\|-----------\|

	- [ISO 27001:2022](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001)
	- [ISO 27001:2022](https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html)

Comments

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🎯 Objective

📊 Current State Analysis

🔍 Missing Elements

🚀 Required Changes

1️⃣ Add Architecture Documentation Map

2️⃣ Add ISMS Policy Alignment

3️⃣ Expand Control Mappings

4️⃣ Add Budget & Resource Planning

5️⃣ Expand Compliance Evolution

6️⃣ Add Document Control Footer

🤖 Recommended Agent

✅ Acceptance Criteria

📚 References

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pethers commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

pethers commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Uh oh!

Copilot AI Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 21, 2026

🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Copilot AI commented Feb 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading