Add Purpose section and Architecture Documentation Map to DATA_MODEL.md#398
Add Purpose section and Architecture Documentation Map to DATA_MODEL.md#398
Conversation
Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds two structural navigation elements to DATA_MODEL.md to align with the Hack23 documentation standard: a Purpose section and an Architecture Documentation Map cross-reference table. The document already had the standard header and footer, so this PR completes the conformance work by adding the missing navigation elements between the header and the main content.
Changes:
- Added
## 🎯 Purposesection explaining the document's scope and content - Added
## 📚 Architecture Documentation Maptable listing all 15 architecture documents with descriptions
|
|
||
| This document defines the data model for the Riksdagsmonitor platform, documenting entity relationships, data structures, CIA product schemas, and data quality metrics for Swedish Parliament political data spanning 50+ years. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 📚 Architecture Documentation Map |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The section title "Architecture Documentation Map" is inconsistent with the established pattern in other conforming documents. FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, FUTURE_MINDMAP.md, and FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md all use "Related Architecture Documentation" as the section title. For consistency across all architecture documents, this should be changed to match the established convention.
| ## 📚 Architecture Documentation Map | |
| ## 📚 Related Architecture Documentation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 7f9bf6e — section title changed to ## 📚 Related Architecture Documentation to match FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, and other conforming docs.
DATA_MODEL.md
Outdated
| | Document | Focus | Description | | ||
| |----------|-------|-------------| | ||
| | [Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | ||
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** | **📊 Data** | **Entities, schemas, relationships** | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The bolding pattern for the current document row is inconsistent with established conventions. Other conforming documents (FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) bold ALL document links in the first column but do not bold the Focus and Description columns. The current implementation bolds all three columns for the Data Model row. Consider either: (1) bolding only the document link like other documents, or (2) adding a textual indicator like STATEDIAGRAM.md does with "(this doc)" or FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md does with "This document:"
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** | **📊 Data** | **Entities, schemas, relationships** | | |
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 7f9bf6e — only the document link in the first column is now bolded, with (this doc) appended, matching the convention in other conforming documents.
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
…tation table Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
DATA_MODEL.md
Outdated
| | [Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | ||
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | | ||
| | [Flowcharts](FLOWCHART.md) | 🔄 Processes | Process flows and data pipelines | | ||
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🔄 Behavior | System state transitions | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This row’s Focus label (🔄 Behavior) doesn’t match the naming used in the other documentation-map tables (commonly 📈 States for STATEDIAGRAM.md). Consider aligning the Focus value so users see consistent terminology across documents.
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🔄 Behavior | System state transitions | | |
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 📈 States | System state transitions | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in c6c3f41 — changed 🔄 Behavior to 📈 States for the State Diagrams row.
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
DATA_MODEL.md
Outdated
| | [Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | ||
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | | ||
| | [Flowcharts](FLOWCHART.md) | 🔄 Processes | Process flows and data pipelines | | ||
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 📈 States | System state transitions | | ||
| | [Mindmap](MINDMAP.md) | 🧠 Concepts | System conceptual relationships | | ||
| | [SWOT](SWOT.md) | 💼 Strategy | Strategic position assessment | | ||
| | [Security Architecture](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🛡️ Security | Defense-in-depth controls | | ||
| | [Threat Model](THREAT_MODEL.md) | 🎯 Threats | STRIDE threat analysis | | ||
| | [Future Architecture](FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Architectural evolution roadmap | | ||
| | [Future Data Model](FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md) | 🚀 Future | Enhanced data architecture plans | | ||
| | [Future Flowcharts](FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced process flows roadmap | | ||
| | [Future State Diagrams](FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced state management | | ||
| | [Future Mindmap](FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) | 🚀 Future | Capability expansion plans | | ||
| | [Future SWOT](FUTURE_SWOT.md) | 🚀 Future | Future strategic opportunities | | ||
| | [Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Planned security improvements | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Focus column values are inconsistent with the established convention in other architecture documents. All conforming documents use different, more specific icons in the Focus column than what appears in the document names. For example, Architecture uses "🏗️ C4 Models" (not "🏛️ C4 Models"), and most future documents use "🔮" icons (not "🚀"). Review FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, STATEDIAGRAM.md, SWOT.md, and their FUTURE_ counterparts to align the Focus column icons with the established pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 467f018 — Focus icons now use 🏗️ for Architecture (C4 Models), 🔒 for Security Architecture, 🔮 for all Future docs, matching the established pattern in FLOWCHART.md and MINDMAP.md.
DATA_MODEL.md
Outdated
| | [Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | ||
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | | ||
| | [Flowcharts](FLOWCHART.md) | 🔄 Processes | Process flows and data pipelines | | ||
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 📈 States | System state transitions | | ||
| | [Mindmap](MINDMAP.md) | 🧠 Concepts | System conceptual relationships | | ||
| | [SWOT](SWOT.md) | 💼 Strategy | Strategic position assessment | | ||
| | [Security Architecture](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🛡️ Security | Defense-in-depth controls | | ||
| | [Threat Model](THREAT_MODEL.md) | 🎯 Threats | STRIDE threat analysis | | ||
| | [Future Architecture](FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Architectural evolution roadmap | | ||
| | [Future Data Model](FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md) | 🚀 Future | Enhanced data architecture plans | | ||
| | [Future Flowcharts](FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced process flows roadmap | | ||
| | [Future State Diagrams](FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced state management | | ||
| | [Future Mindmap](FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) | 🚀 Future | Capability expansion plans | | ||
| | [Future SWOT](FUTURE_SWOT.md) | 🚀 Future | Future strategic opportunities | | ||
| | [Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Planned security improvements | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The table format is inconsistent with all other architecture documents in the repository. All conforming documents include emoji icons within the document names in the first column (e.g., "[🏛️ Architecture]", "[📊 Data Model]"). This table omits the icons from the document names and only includes them in the Focus column. For consistency, add the emoji icons to each document name in the first column to match the established pattern seen in FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, STATEDIAGRAM.md, SWOT.md, FUTURE_MINDMAP.md, FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md, and FUTURE_SWOT.md.
| | [Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | |
| | **[Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | | |
| | [Flowcharts](FLOWCHART.md) | 🔄 Processes | Process flows and data pipelines | | |
| | [State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 📈 States | System state transitions | | |
| | [Mindmap](MINDMAP.md) | 🧠 Concepts | System conceptual relationships | | |
| | [SWOT](SWOT.md) | 💼 Strategy | Strategic position assessment | | |
| | [Security Architecture](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🛡️ Security | Defense-in-depth controls | | |
| | [Threat Model](THREAT_MODEL.md) | 🎯 Threats | STRIDE threat analysis | | |
| | [Future Architecture](FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Architectural evolution roadmap | | |
| | [Future Data Model](FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md) | 🚀 Future | Enhanced data architecture plans | | |
| | [Future Flowcharts](FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced process flows roadmap | | |
| | [Future State Diagrams](FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced state management | | |
| | [Future Mindmap](FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) | 🚀 Future | Capability expansion plans | | |
| | [Future SWOT](FUTURE_SWOT.md) | 🚀 Future | Future strategic opportunities | | |
| | [Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Planned security improvements | | |
| | [🏛️ Architecture](ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🏛️ C4 Models | System structure and components | | |
| | **[📊 Data Model](DATA_MODEL.md)** (this doc) | 📊 Data | Entities, schemas, relationships | | |
| | [🔄 Flowcharts](FLOWCHART.md) | 🔄 Processes | Process flows and data pipelines | | |
| | [📈 State Diagrams](STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 📈 States | System state transitions | | |
| | [🧠 Mindmap](MINDMAP.md) | 🧠 Concepts | System conceptual relationships | | |
| | [💼 SWOT](SWOT.md) | 💼 Strategy | Strategic position assessment | | |
| | [🛡️ Security Architecture](SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🛡️ Security | Defense-in-depth controls | | |
| | [🎯 Threat Model](THREAT_MODEL.md) | 🎯 Threats | STRIDE threat analysis | | |
| | [🚀 Future Architecture](FUTURE_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Architectural evolution roadmap | | |
| | [🚀 Future Data Model](FUTURE_DATA_MODEL.md) | 🚀 Future | Enhanced data architecture plans | | |
| | [🚀 Future Flowcharts](FUTURE_FLOWCHART.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced process flows roadmap | | |
| | [🚀 Future State Diagrams](FUTURE_STATEDIAGRAM.md) | 🚀 Future | Advanced state management | | |
| | [🚀 Future Mindmap](FUTURE_MINDMAP.md) | 🚀 Future | Capability expansion plans | | |
| | [🚀 Future SWOT](FUTURE_SWOT.md) | 🚀 Future | Future strategic opportunities | | |
| | [🚀 Future Security Architecture](FUTURE_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md) | 🚀 Future | Planned security improvements | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fixed in 467f018 — all document names now include emoji icons (e.g., [🏛️ Architecture], [📊 Data Model], [🔄 Flowchart]) matching the pattern in FLOWCHART.md and MINDMAP.md. Section title also restored to ## 📚 Architecture Documentation Map to match conforming docs.
|
@copilot apply changes based on the comments in this thread |
🔍 Lighthouse Performance Audit
📥 Download full Lighthouse report Budget Compliance: Performance budgets enforced via |
Co-authored-by: pethers <[email protected]>
DATA_MODEL.mdalready had the Hack23 standard header and Document Control footer but was missing two structural navigation elements present in all conforming docs (FLOWCHART.md, MINDMAP.md, etc.).Changes
## 🎯 Purpose— Added after the opening---separator, before## Executive Summary. Describes the document's scope: entity relationships, CIA product schemas, and data quality metrics.## 📚 Architecture Documentation Map— Added immediately after Purpose. A 15-row table matching the established convention in FLOWCHART.md and MINDMAP.md exactly:[🏛️ Architecture],[📊 Data Model])🏗️for C4 Models,🔒for Security Architecture,🔮for all Future documentsNo existing content modified — 26 lines inserted, file grows from 2,506 → 2,532 lines.
Original prompt
🔒 GitHub Advanced Security automatically protects Copilot coding agent pull requests. You can protect all pull requests by enabling Advanced Security for your repositories. Learn more about Advanced Security.