Skip to content

Conversation

@connorjclark
Copy link
Collaborator

reverts #15915

closes #15870

We never got any sentry hits for this, and I'm unable to reproduce this today.

@connorjclark connorjclark requested a review from a team as a code owner June 4, 2025 22:41
@connorjclark connorjclark requested review from paulirish and removed request for a team June 4, 2025 22:41
${normalizedAuditSettings[k]}`);
Difference found at: \`${k}\`: ${JSON.stringify(normalizedGatherSettings[k], null, 2)}
vs: ${JSON.stringify(normalizedAuditSettings[k], null, 2)}`);
}
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drive by improvement here... was printing [Object] when throttling settings differed

@connorjclark connorjclark merged commit d7bfafb into main Jun 4, 2025
28 checks passed
@connorjclark connorjclark deleted the revert-imp-nodes branch June 4, 2025 23:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TraceElements: impactedNodes is not iterable

2 participants