1- fixing bug in taking screen shot for for Appium Web session#3804
Conversation
2- fixing bugs with merging 2 POM elements from same Category
WalkthroughThe recent changes include improvements in the logic for merging properties and locators in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Application Models/Delta/PomDelta/PomDeltaUtils.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Mobile/Appium/GenericAppiumDriver.cs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Application Models/Delta/PomDelta/PomDeltaUtils.cs (1)
765-766: Ensure proper handling of property categories during merge.When merging properties, the check includes both
NameandCategory. Ensure that properties with the same name but different categories are handled correctly according to the application's requirements.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Mobile/Appium/GenericAppiumDriver.cs (1)
Line range hint
2759-2765: Verify the impact of changing the screenshot frequency.The frequency of taking screenshots has been changed from every 5th session to every 30th session for
NativeHybrideapp type. Ensure this change meets the requirements and does not adversely affect the functionality.Additionally, consider adding a comment to explain the rationale behind this change to improve code maintainability.
| ElementLocator originalLocator = originalElement.Locators.FirstOrDefault(x => x.LocateBy == secondElement.Locators[i].LocateBy && x.LocateValue == secondElement.Locators[i].LocateValue && x.Category == secondElement.Locators[i].Category && x.IsAutoLearned == true); | ||
| if (originalLocator == null) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling potential conflicts during locator merge.
The current logic adds the second element's locator if it doesn't match any existing locator in the original element. Consider how to handle potential conflicts or duplicates effectively, especially when IsAutoLearned is true.
2- fixing bugs with merging 2 POM elements from same Category
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit