Runset Optimization#3436
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates aim to enhance the robustness and reliability of the Ginger automation framework. The changes include improved Selenium integration with better page load verification, refined exception handling, and more efficient agent management. Additionally, there are adjustments to the execution feedback mechanism for clarity. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 6
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (4 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs (4 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunsetExecutor.cs (10 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/AgentOperations.cs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/RunLib/AgentOperations.cs
Additional comments: 12
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunsetExecutor.cs (10)
178-178: The method
InitRunneris responsible for configuring the runner for execution. It checks if the executor is not null and is of typeGingerExecutionEngine, then clears bindings. This is a good practice to ensure that the runner is in a clean state before configuration.453-453: Setting
mRunSetConfig.IsRunningto true at the start of theRunRunsetmethod is correct to indicate that the runset execution has started.460-460: The
elseblock starting here is checking if the execution logger configuration is set to publish to a central database and if the endpoint URL is not empty. It then validates the execution ID. This is a good check to prevent duplicate execution IDs.483-483: The method
ResetRunnersExecutionDetailsis called conditionally based on theReRunConfigurationssettings. This is a good use of conditional logic to control the flow of the application.509-509: The
RunSetStartmethod of theCenteralized_Loggeris called asynchronously, which is a good practice for potentially long-running operations that could block the UI thread.520-520: The
DisableTestsExecutionmethod is called with thetestsToExcludearray and theRunSetConfigobject. This method is likely responsible for disabling the execution of certain tests based on external input, which is a flexible feature.561-561: The commented-out
Thread.Sleep(1000)is likely the line that was removed as part of the optimizations mentioned in the PR objectives. It's good to see that unnecessary delays are being removed.625-630: The
RunSetEndmethod of theCenteralized_Loggeris called asynchronously, which is consistent with the earlier call toRunSetStart. This ensures that the end of the runset is logged without blocking the main thread.664-664: Setting
mRunSetConfig.IsRunningto false in thefinallyblock is a good practice to ensure that the state is correctly updated regardless of how thetryblock exits.735-735: The method
ResetRunsetActionscorrectly resets the status and errors of eachRunSetActionBasein theRunSetConfig. This is important for ensuring that the state is clean for the next execution.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs (2)
742-742: The addition of the
SemaphoreSlimsemaphore is a good practice for managing concurrent access to a resource. Ensure that it is used consistently throughout the codebase for similar synchronization needs.759-794: The implementation of synchronization using
SemaphoreSlimin theSetupVirtualAgentsmethod appears correct. However, ensure that all possible exceptions are handled properly to avoid a situation wheresemaphoreSlim.Release()might not be called due to an unhandled exception, which would lead to a deadlock.Verification successful
The search results confirm that
semaphoreSlimis declared and used within theGingerExecutionEngine.csfile. It is used in theSetupVirtualAgentsmethod, with aWait()call before entering a critical section and aRelease()call in thefinallyblock to ensure the semaphore is released even if an exception occurs.Given this information, the use of
SemaphoreSlimfor synchronization in theSetupVirtualAgentsmethod is implemented correctly, with proper exception handling to avoid deadlocks.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that semaphoreSlim is used consistently and correctly throughout the codebase. rg --type cs "semaphoreSlim"Length of output: 362
| int maxAttempts = 5; | ||
| int attemptCount = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| int count = 0; | ||
| ///IAsyncResult result; | ||
| //Action action = () => | ||
| var action = Task.Run(() => | ||
| while (attemptCount <= maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| int count = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| Thread.Sleep(100); | ||
| //Thread.Sleep(100); | ||
| count = Driver.WindowHandles.Count; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (System.InvalidCastException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount = 0; | ||
| attemptCount = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic for resetting attemptCount to 0 in the catch block for InvalidCastException seems incorrect. This would cause an infinite loop if this exception is thrown because attemptCount will never reach maxAttempts. Consider incrementing attemptCount instead.
- attemptCount = 0;
+ attemptCount++;Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| int maxAttempts = 5; | |
| int attemptCount = 0; | |
| int count = 0; | |
| ///IAsyncResult result; | |
| //Action action = () => | |
| var action = Task.Run(() => | |
| while (attemptCount <= maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| try | |
| { | |
| int count = 0; | |
| try | |
| { | |
| Thread.Sleep(100); | |
| //Thread.Sleep(100); | |
| count = Driver.WindowHandles.Count; | |
| } | |
| catch (System.InvalidCastException ex) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount = 0; | |
| attemptCount = 0; | |
| int maxAttempts = 5; | |
| int attemptCount = 0; | |
| while (attemptCount <= maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| try | |
| { | |
| int count = 0; | |
| try | |
| { | |
| //Thread.Sleep(100); | |
| count = Driver.WindowHandles.Count; | |
| } | |
| catch (System.InvalidCastException ex) | |
| { | |
| attemptCount++; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ok , will remove the attemptCount = 0 line from the code as it does not really make sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@manas-droid Yes, removing the attemptCount = 0 line will prevent the possibility of an infinite loop. If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask.
| /* void CheckifPageLoaded() | ||
| { | ||
| Thread.Sleep(300); | ||
| //TODO: slow function, try to check alternatives or let the user config wait for | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| bool DomElementIncreasing = true; | ||
| int CurrentDomElementSize = 0; | ||
| int SameSizzeCounter = 0; | ||
| while (DomElementIncreasing) | ||
| { | ||
| Thread.Sleep(300); | ||
|
|
||
| int instanceSize = Driver.FindElements(By.CssSelector("*")).Count; | ||
| int instanceSize = Driver.FindElements(By.CssSelector("*")).Count; | ||
|
|
||
| if (instanceSize > CurrentDomElementSize) | ||
| { | ||
| CurrentDomElementSize = instanceSize; | ||
| SameSizzeCounter = 0; | ||
| continue; | ||
| if (instanceSize > CurrentDomElementSize) | ||
| { | ||
| CurrentDomElementSize = instanceSize; | ||
| SameSizzeCounter = 0; | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| SameSizzeCounter++; | ||
| if (SameSizzeCounter == 5) | ||
| { | ||
| DomElementIncreasing = false; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| catch | ||
| { | ||
| SameSizzeCounter++; | ||
| if (SameSizzeCounter == 5) | ||
| { | ||
| DomElementIncreasing = false; | ||
| } | ||
| // Do nothing... | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch | ||
| */ | ||
| void CheckifPageLoaded() | ||
| { | ||
| WebDriverWait webDriverWait = new WebDriverWait(Driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(ImplicitWait)); | ||
| webDriverWait.Until((driver) => | ||
| { | ||
| // Do nothing... | ||
| } | ||
| object jQuery = ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return window.jQuery && jQuery.active == 0"); | ||
|
|
||
| bool IsJqueryCompleted = jQuery == null ? true : jQuery.Equals(true); | ||
| return | ||
| ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return document.readyState").Equals("complete") && IsJqueryCompleted; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The refactoring of the CheckifPageLoaded method to use WebDriverWait is a good improvement for reliability. However, the old method implementation is commented out rather than removed. It's best practice to remove unused code to keep the codebase clean. If this code needs to be preserved for historical reasons, it should be stored in version control, not commented out in the source.
- /* void CheckifPageLoaded()
- {
- // Old implementation...
- }
- */Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| /* void CheckifPageLoaded() | |
| { | |
| Thread.Sleep(300); | |
| //TODO: slow function, try to check alternatives or let the user config wait for | |
| try | |
| { | |
| bool DomElementIncreasing = true; | |
| int CurrentDomElementSize = 0; | |
| int SameSizzeCounter = 0; | |
| while (DomElementIncreasing) | |
| { | |
| Thread.Sleep(300); | |
| int instanceSize = Driver.FindElements(By.CssSelector("*")).Count; | |
| int instanceSize = Driver.FindElements(By.CssSelector("*")).Count; | |
| if (instanceSize > CurrentDomElementSize) | |
| { | |
| CurrentDomElementSize = instanceSize; | |
| SameSizzeCounter = 0; | |
| continue; | |
| if (instanceSize > CurrentDomElementSize) | |
| { | |
| CurrentDomElementSize = instanceSize; | |
| SameSizzeCounter = 0; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| SameSizzeCounter++; | |
| if (SameSizzeCounter == 5) | |
| { | |
| DomElementIncreasing = false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| else | |
| catch | |
| { | |
| SameSizzeCounter++; | |
| if (SameSizzeCounter == 5) | |
| { | |
| DomElementIncreasing = false; | |
| } | |
| // Do nothing... | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch | |
| */ | |
| void CheckifPageLoaded() | |
| { | |
| WebDriverWait webDriverWait = new WebDriverWait(Driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(ImplicitWait)); | |
| webDriverWait.Until((driver) => | |
| { | |
| // Do nothing... | |
| } | |
| object jQuery = ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return window.jQuery && jQuery.active == 0"); | |
| bool IsJqueryCompleted = jQuery == null ? true : jQuery.Equals(true); | |
| return | |
| ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return document.readyState").Equals("complete") && IsJqueryCompleted; | |
| }); | |
| void CheckifPageLoaded() | |
| { | |
| WebDriverWait webDriverWait = new WebDriverWait(Driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(ImplicitWait)); | |
| webDriverWait.Until((driver) => | |
| { | |
| object jQuery = ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return window.jQuery && jQuery.active == 0"); | |
| bool IsJqueryCompleted = jQuery == null ? true : jQuery.Equals(true); | |
| return | |
| ((IJavaScriptExecutor)driver).ExecuteScript("return document.readyState").Equals("complete") && IsJqueryCompleted; | |
| }); | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We need this commented code for later use
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I understand that you wish to keep the commented code for future reference or use. While it's typically recommended to use version control systems for maintaining historical code, I respect your decision to keep it within the source files for convenience. If you need to access this code frequently or quickly revert changes, having it commented might be practical for your workflow.
(\\(\\
(-.-)
o_(")(")
Keeping the old ways close to heart.
New Learnings Added
User: manas-droid
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#3436
File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs:6702-6749
Timestamp: 2024-01-10T08:58:17.226Z
Learning: The user has indicated that the commented `CheckifPageLoaded` method is needed for later use, suggesting a requirement to retain the code within the source files for reference or potential re-implementation.
| public class RunsetExecutor : INotifyPropertyChanged | ||
| { | ||
| public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; | ||
| public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The implementation of OnPropertyChanged follows the standard pattern for INotifyPropertyChanged. However, the null check can be simplified using the null-conditional operator.
- PropertyChangedEventHandler handler = PropertyChanged;
- if (handler != null)
- {
- handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));
- }
+ PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name));Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; | |
| public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; | |
| PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(name)); |
| if (doContinueRun == false) | ||
| { | ||
| GR.Executor.RunRunner(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| if (GR.Status == Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.Execution.eRunStatus.Stopped)//we continue only Stopped Runners | ||
| { | ||
| GR.Executor.ResetRunnerExecutionDetails(doNotResetBusFlows: true);//reset stopped runners only and not their BF's | ||
| GR.Executor.ContinueRun(eContinueLevel.Runner, eContinueFrom.LastStoppedAction); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning is appropriate for tasks that are expected to run for an extended period. However, the nested if-else blocks could be refactored for better readability.
- if (doContinueRun == false)
- {
- GR.Executor.RunRunner();
- }
- else
- if (GR.Status == Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.Execution.eRunStatus.Stopped)
- {
- GR.Executor.ResetRunnerExecutionDetails(doNotResetBusFlows: true);
- GR.Executor.ContinueRun(eContinueLevel.Runner, eContinueFrom.LastStoppedAction);
- }
+ if (!doContinueRun)
+ {
+ GR.Executor.RunRunner();
+ }
+ else if (GR.Status == Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.Execution.eRunStatus.Stopped)
+ {
+ GR.Executor.ResetRunnerExecutionDetails(doNotResetBusFlows: true);
+ GR.Executor.ContinueRun(eContinueLevel.Runner, eContinueFrom.LastStoppedAction);
+ }Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (doContinueRun == false) | |
| { | |
| GR.Executor.RunRunner(); | |
| } | |
| else | |
| if (GR.Status == Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.Execution.eRunStatus.Stopped)//we continue only Stopped Runners | |
| { | |
| GR.Executor.ResetRunnerExecutionDetails(doNotResetBusFlows: true);//reset stopped runners only and not their BF's | |
| GR.Executor.ContinueRun(eContinueLevel.Runner, eContinueFrom.LastStoppedAction); | |
| } | |
| if (!doContinueRun) | |
| { | |
| GR.Executor.RunRunner(); | |
| } | |
| else if (GR.Status == Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.Execution.eRunStatus.Stopped)//we continue only Stopped Runners | |
| { | |
| GR.Executor.ResetRunnerExecutionDetails(doNotResetBusFlows: true);//reset stopped runners only and not their BF's | |
| GR.Executor.ContinueRun(eContinueLevel.Runner, eContinueFrom.LastStoppedAction); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, will make this change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@manas-droid Great, I'm glad the suggestion was helpful. If you need any further assistance, feel free to ask. Happy coding!
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
| codeBlock(); | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| while (!task.IsCompleted && st.ElapsedMilliseconds < timeSpan.TotalMilliseconds && !mStopRun) | ||
| { | ||
| task.Wait(500); // Give user feedback every 500ms | ||
| act.Elapsed = st.ElapsedMilliseconds; | ||
| GiveUserFeedback(); | ||
| act.Elapsed = st.ElapsedMilliseconds; | ||
| GiveUserFeedback(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The review of the ExecuteActionWithTimeLimit method in GingerExecutionEngine.cs shows that while exceptions are caught and handled, there is no evidence of a cancellation token being used with the task. This means that the task may not be set up to respond to cancellation requests through the standard .NET task cancellation mechanism. The code does provide user feedback every 500ms and handles a stop condition with the mStopRun flag.
Given the absence of a cancellation token, the review comment's concern about potentially ignoring task cancellation requests is valid. However, exceptions are not ignored, as there is a catch block to handle them.
Analysis chain
The changes in the ExecuteActionWithTimeLimit method seem to adjust the feedback mechanism by providing user feedback every 500ms. This is a good practice for long-running tasks. However, ensure that the task.Wait(500) does not introduce any unintended consequences, such as ignoring task cancellation requests or exceptions that should be handled immediately.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that task.Wait is used correctly and does not ignore cancellation requests or exceptions.
rg --type cs "task.Wait"
Length of output: 442
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the complete implementation of the ExecuteActionWithTimeLimit method to verify handling of cancellations and exceptions.
rg --type cs -C 30 "ExecuteActionWithTimeLimit" Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs
Length of output: 5795
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for task creation and cancellation token logic related to the ExecuteActionWithTimeLimit method.
rg --type cs -A 10 "Task.Factory.StartNew" Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/GingerExecutionEngine.cs
Length of output: 542
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (4 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunsetExecutor.cs (12 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Run/RunsetExecutor.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 11
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (11)
- Ginger/Ginger/Activities/ActivitiesListViewHelper.cs (5 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/ExecutionSummaryPage.xaml (1 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/NewAutomatePage.xaml (2 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/Dictionaries/Skins/GingerDefaultSkinDictionary.xaml (1 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/NewTreeViewItemBase.cs (1 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCListView/UcListViewItem.xaml (2 hunks)
- Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCListView/UcListViewItem.xaml.cs (6 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDB.cs (12 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (6 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (3 hunks)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbManager.cs (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Ginger/Ginger/Dictionaries/Skins/GingerDefaultSkinDictionary.xaml
Additional comments: 27
Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/ExecutionSummaryPage.xaml (1)
- 6-6: The
HeightandWidthofExecutionSummaryPagehave been changed to 600 each. Please ensure that all elements within the page are still displayed correctly and that this change does not negatively impact the user interface or the layout of any contained elements.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbConnector.cs (3)
28-31: The addition of comments regarding the future handling of multi-access to database files is a good practice for providing guidance for future development.
46-60: Refactoring of exception handling in the
GetCollectionmethod is done correctly by logging the error and rethrowing the exception, which is a good practice for error handling.137-138: The change from a
usingstatement to ausingdeclaration in theSetCollectionmethod simplifies the code and ensures the disposal of the object at the end of the enclosing scope, which is a feature of C# 8.0.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/LiteDBFolder/LiteDbManager.cs (1)
- 142-155: The introduction of a
SemaphoreSlimin theWriteToLiteDbmethod is a good practice to ensure thread safety during write operations. Please verify that the semaphore is used correctly throughout the codebase to prevent potential deadlocks or race conditions.Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCListView/UcListViewItem.xaml (1)
- 93-150: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [96-159]
Modifications to the layout and styling of UI elements in
UcListViewItem.xaml, such as text block alignment and font size, have been made. Please ensure that these changes do not disrupt the intended appearance and behavior of the UI elements when selected or in their default state.Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/NewTreeViewItemBase.cs (1)
- 101-103: Storing the result of the user confirmation in a variable and adding a condition for
eUserMsgSelection.Noneenhances the readability and robustness of the deletion logic inNewTreeViewItemBase.cs.Ginger/Ginger/AutomatePageLib/NewAutomatePage.xaml (2)
321-321: The width of a column in the Grid has been changed from 650 to 550. This change should be verified to ensure it aligns with the intended design and does not negatively impact the layout or user experience.
330-330: The margin of the GridSplitter has been changed from "0,0,0,0" to "0,0,0,10". This change adds spacing at the bottom of the GridSplitter, which could improve visual separation. Ensure this change is consistent with the design standards of the application.
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCListView/UcListViewItem.xaml.cs (1)
- 760-779: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [700-770]
The methods
AlignGridandTextWidthandXDetailsGrid_SizeChangedhave been added to dynamically adjust the width of the text blocks based on the actual width of the grid column. This is a good approach to ensure that the UI adapts to different sizes and maintains a good user experience.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/DataSource/LiteDB.cs (7)
40-40: The introduction of a
SemaphoreSlimfor thread safety is a good practice when dealing with potential concurrent database access.65-111: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [52-71]
The use of
LiteDBLock.Wait()andLiteDBLock.Release()inAddColumnmethod ensures that the database operations are thread-safe. However, it's important to ensure thatLiteDBLock.Release()is called in afinallyblock to guarantee the release even if an exception occurs.
78-107: Similar to the previous comment, the
AddTablemethod correctly implements theSemaphoreSlimto manage concurrent access.200-210: The
DeleteTablemethod correctly uses theSemaphoreSlimto ensure thread safety.585-627: The
GetTablesListmethod correctly uses theSemaphoreSlimto ensure thread safety.632-641: The
IsTableExistmethod correctly uses theSemaphoreSlimto ensure thread safety.646-663: The
RemoveColumnmethod correctly uses theSemaphoreSlimto ensure thread safety.Ginger/Ginger/Activities/ActivitiesListViewHelper.cs (5)
675-675: The tooltip for the delete operation has been updated to improve clarity. The change from "Delete all" to "Delete" followed by the group and its activities is more precise.
685-685: The tooltip for the disable operation has been updated to improve clarity. The change from "Disable all" to "Disable" followed by the group and its activities is more precise.
695-695: The tooltip for the activate operation has been updated to improve clarity. The change from "Activate all" to "Activate" followed by the group and its activities is more precise.
734-734: The tooltip for the export operation has been updated to improve clarity. The change from "Export" with incorrect grammar "and it" to "and its" corrects the grammatical mistake and is more precise.
753-753: The tooltip for the add to shared repository operation has been updated to improve clarity. The change from "Add" with incorrect grammar "and it" to "and its" corrects the grammatical mistake and is more precise.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (5)
1581-1581: The addition of
string filepath = null;before the try block is a good practice to ensure the variable is initialized and can be used after the try-catch block.1590-1603: Moving the
filepathassignment inside theusingblock ensures that the file path is only set if the screenshots are successfully taken and merged. This is a good change for better error handling and resource management.1606-1609: Adding a check for
!string.IsNullOrEmpty(filepath)before adding toact.ScreenShotsNamesandact.ScreenShotsis a good defensive programming practice to avoid null or empty paths being added to the action's screenshots.4409-4417: The introduction of a
whileloop with a maximum attempt count is a good refactor to replace the previous recursive approach. This change should improve the reliability and maintainability of theIsRunningmethod.6699-6746: The refactoring of the
CheckifPageLoadedmethod to useWebDriverWaitandIJavaScriptExecutorfor improved page load checking is a significant improvement. However, as per the learning from the user, the old implementation is commented out for future reference. This decision should be respected, and no further action is required regarding the commented code.
| }); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void AlignGridandTextWidth() | ||
| { | ||
| if (xItemNameColumn.ActualWidth > 200) | ||
| { | ||
| xItemNameTxtBlock.MaxWidth = xItemNameColumn.ActualWidth - 100; | ||
| xItemDescriptionTxtBlock.MaxWidth = xItemNameTxtBlock.MaxWidth; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void XDetailsGrid_SizeChanged(object sender, SizeChangedEventArgs e) | ||
| { | ||
| AlignGridandTextWidth(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private void SetItemDescription() | ||
| { | ||
| this.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [700-770]
It's important to note that the SizeChanged event handler is being added every time SetItemFullName is called. This could potentially lead to multiple event subscriptions if SetItemFullName is called multiple times. Consider checking if the handler is already attached before adding it or ensure that SetItemFullName is only called once during the lifecycle of the control.
- xDetailsGrid.SizeChanged += XDetailsGrid_SizeChanged;
+ if (!isSizeChangedHandlerAttached) {
+ xDetailsGrid.SizeChanged += XDetailsGrid_SizeChanged;
+ isSizeChangedHandlerAttached = true;
+ }| if(attemptCount < maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount++; | ||
| return (IsRunning()); | ||
| attemptCount++; | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (count == 0) | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (count == 0) | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.UnhandledAlertException) | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.UnhandledAlertException) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.NoSuchWindowException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.NoSuchWindowException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | ||
| { | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount++; | ||
| return (IsRunning()); | ||
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| attemptCount++; | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverTimeoutException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Timeout exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverTimeoutException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Timeout exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount++; | ||
| return (IsRunning()); | ||
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| attemptCount++; | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Webdriver exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
|
|
||
| if (PreviousRunStopped && ex.Message == "Unexpected error. Error 404: Not Found\r\nNot Found") | ||
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException ex) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Webdriver exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | ||
|
|
||
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount++; | ||
| return (IsRunning()); | ||
| if (PreviousRunStopped && ex.Message == "Unexpected error. Error 404: Not Found\r\nNot Found") | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| attemptCount++; | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| CloseDriver(); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| CloseDriver(); | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex2) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | ||
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | ||
| catch (Exception ex2) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | ||
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| CloseDriver(); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| CloseDriver(); | ||
| return false; | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| return true; | ||
|
|
||
| return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The refactoring of the exception handling in the IsRunning method to use a loop with a maximum attempt count and improved exception handling is a good change. However, there is a potential issue with the logic: the attemptCount is incremented inside each catch block, which could lead to multiple increments per loop iteration if multiple exceptions are caught. This needs to be verified and potentially corrected to ensure that attemptCount is only incremented once per iteration.
- if (attemptCount < maxAttempts)
- {
- attemptCount++;
- continue;
- }
+ // Move the attemptCount incrementation and continue logic outside the catch blocks to ensure it only happens once per iteration.Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if(attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount++; | |
| return (IsRunning()); | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (count == 0) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (count == 0) | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.UnhandledAlertException) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.UnhandledAlertException) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.NoSuchWindowException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.NoSuchWindowException ex) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount++; | |
| return (IsRunning()); | |
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverTimeoutException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Timeout exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverTimeoutException ex) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Timeout exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount++; | |
| return (IsRunning()); | |
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Webdriver exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| if (PreviousRunStopped && ex.Message == "Unexpected error. Error 404: Not Found\r\nNot Found") | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException ex) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Webdriver exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount++; | |
| return (IsRunning()); | |
| if (PreviousRunStopped && ex.Message == "Unexpected error. Error 404: Not Found\r\nNot Found") | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| catch (Exception ex2) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | |
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | |
| catch (Exception ex2) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | |
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| return false; | |
| if(attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| } | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| if (count == 0) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.UnhandledAlertException) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.NoSuchWindowException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverTimeoutException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Timeout exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| var currentWindow = Driver.CurrentWindowHandle; | |
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentWindow)) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| catch (OpenQA.Selenium.WebDriverException ex) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Webdriver exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex); | |
| if (PreviousRunStopped && ex.Message == "Unexpected error. Error 404: Not Found\r\nNot Found") | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| catch (Exception ex2) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | |
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return false; |
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| using (var db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| var CopyTable = db.GetCollection(CopyTableName); | ||
| var table = db.GetCollection(tableName); | ||
|
|
||
| DataTable dtChange = new DataTable(CopyTableName); | ||
| dtChange = datatable(table.FindAll() , CopyTableName); | ||
| SaveTable(dtChange , CopyTable); | ||
| DataTable dtChange = new DataTable(CopyTableName); | ||
| dtChange = datatable(table.FindAll(), CopyTableName); | ||
| SaveTable(dtChange, CopyTable); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The CopyTable method also correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim. However, it's important to note that the method increments the table name with "_Copy" until a non-existing name is found. This could potentially lead to a large number of iterations if there are many copies. Consider adding a limit to the number of iterations or a different naming strategy.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| if (tableName == "") | ||
| { return mColumnNames; } | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| List<string> mColumnNames = new(); | ||
| using (var db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| if (tableName == "") | ||
| { return mColumnNames; } | ||
|
|
||
| var results = db.GetCollection(tableName).Find(Query.All(), 0).ToList(); | ||
| mColumnNames = GetColumnList(results, tableName); | ||
| //var name = mColumnNames.RemoveAll(i => i.Contains("Name")); Commented this as we are not able to see columnNames which contain "Name" keyword in it. | ||
| var results = db.GetCollection(tableName).Find(Query.All(), 0).ToList(); | ||
| mColumnNames = GetColumnList(results, tableName); | ||
| //var name = mColumnNames.RemoveAll(i => i.Contains("Name")); Commented this as we are not able to see columnNames which contain "Name" keyword in it. | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| return mColumnNames; | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The GetColumnList method is properly synchronized with SemaphoreSlim. However, the commented line //var name = mColumnNames.RemoveAll(i => i.Contains("Name")); suggests there was an intention to remove certain column names. If this is no longer needed, it's best to remove the commented code to avoid confusion.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| var results = db.GetCollection(query).Find(Query.All(), 0).ToList(); | ||
| try | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| List<string> mColumnNames = new List<string>(); | ||
| DataTable dataTable = new DataTable(); | ||
| bool duplicate = false; | ||
| using (var db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| if (results.Count > 0) | ||
| var results = db.GetCollection(query).Find(Query.All(), 0).ToList(); | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| var result = db.GetCollection<BsonDocument>(query); | ||
|
|
||
| var dt = new LiteDataTable(results.ToString()); | ||
| foreach (var doc in results) | ||
| if (results.Count > 0) | ||
| { | ||
| var dr = dt.NewRow() as LiteDataRow; | ||
| if (dr != null) | ||
| var result = db.GetCollection<BsonDocument>(query); | ||
|
|
||
| var dt = new LiteDataTable(results.ToString()); | ||
| foreach (var doc in results) | ||
| { | ||
| dr.UnderlyingValue = doc; | ||
| foreach (var property in doc.RawValue) | ||
| var dr = dt.NewRow() as LiteDataRow; | ||
| if (dr != null) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!property.Value.IsMaxValue && !property.Value.IsMinValue) | ||
| dr.UnderlyingValue = doc; | ||
| foreach (var property in doc.RawValue) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!dt.Columns.Contains(property.Key)) | ||
| { | ||
| dt.Columns.Add(property.Key, typeof(string)); | ||
| } | ||
| if(property.Value.RawValue != null) | ||
| if (!property.Value.IsMaxValue && !property.Value.IsMinValue) | ||
| { | ||
| if (property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,BsonValue]" || property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,LiteDB.BsonValue]") | ||
| if (!dt.Columns.Contains(property.Key)) | ||
| { | ||
| dr[property.Key] = ""; | ||
| dt.Columns.Add(property.Key, typeof(string)); | ||
| } | ||
| else if (property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Data.DataRowCollection" || property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,LiteDB.BsonValue]") | ||
| if (property.Value.RawValue != null) | ||
| { | ||
| duplicate = true; | ||
| if (property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,BsonValue]" || property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,LiteDB.BsonValue]") | ||
| { | ||
| dr[property.Key] = ""; | ||
| } | ||
| else if (property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Data.DataRowCollection" || property.Value.RawValue.ToString() == "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,LiteDB.BsonValue]") | ||
| { | ||
| duplicate = true; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dr[property.Key] = property.Value.RawValue.ToString(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dr[property.Key] = property.Value.RawValue.ToString(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dr[property.Key] = string.Empty; | ||
| dr[property.Key] = string.Empty; | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| dt.Rows.Add(dr); | ||
| } | ||
| dt.Rows.Add(dr); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| DataTable aa = dt; | ||
| bool dosort = true; | ||
| if (duplicate) | ||
| { | ||
| dt.Rows.RemoveAt(dt.Rows.Count - 1); | ||
| } | ||
| DataTable dt2 = dt.Clone(); | ||
| dt2.Columns["GINGER_ID"].DataType = Type.GetType("System.Int32"); | ||
| DataTable aa = dt; | ||
| bool dosort = true; | ||
| if (duplicate) | ||
| { | ||
| dt.Rows.RemoveAt(dt.Rows.Count - 1); | ||
| } | ||
| DataTable dt2 = dt.Clone(); | ||
| dt2.Columns["GINGER_ID"].DataType = Type.GetType("System.Int32"); | ||
|
|
||
| foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows) | ||
| { | ||
| if (Convert.ToString(dr["GINGER_ID"]) == "") | ||
| foreach (DataRow dr in dt.Rows) | ||
| { | ||
| dosort = false; | ||
| if (Convert.ToString(dr["GINGER_ID"]) == "") | ||
| { | ||
| dosort = false; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.ImportRow(dr); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (dosort) | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.AcceptChanges(); | ||
| DataView dv = dt2.DefaultView; | ||
| dv.Sort = "GINGER_ID ASC"; | ||
|
|
||
| aa = dv.ToTable(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.ImportRow(dr); | ||
| aa.Rows.RemoveAt(0); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (dosort) | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.AcceptChanges(); | ||
| DataView dv = dt2.DefaultView; | ||
| dv.Sort = "GINGER_ID ASC"; | ||
|
|
||
| aa = dv.ToTable(); | ||
| aa.TableName = query; | ||
| dataTable = aa; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| aa.Rows.RemoveAt(0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| aa.TableName = query; | ||
| dataTable = aa; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| // If we need to run a direct query | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| // Converting BSON to JSON | ||
| JArray array = new (); | ||
| // This query needs SQL Command | ||
| BsonValue[] result = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in result) | ||
| // If we need to run a direct query | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| string js = LiteDB.JsonSerializer.Serialize(bs); | ||
| if (js == "0" || js == "1") | ||
| // Converting BSON to JSON | ||
| JArray array = new(); | ||
| // This query needs SQL Command | ||
| BsonValue[] result = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in result) | ||
| { | ||
| return dataTable; | ||
| } | ||
| JObject jo = JObject.Parse(js); | ||
| JObject jo2 = new JObject(); | ||
| foreach (JToken jt in jo.Children()) | ||
| { | ||
| if ((jt as JProperty).Name != "_id") | ||
| string js = LiteDB.JsonSerializer.Serialize(bs); | ||
| if (js == "0" || js == "1") | ||
| { | ||
| return dataTable; | ||
| } | ||
| JObject jo = JObject.Parse(js); | ||
| JObject jo2 = new JObject(); | ||
| foreach (JToken jt in jo.Children()) | ||
| { | ||
| string sData = jt.ToString(); | ||
| Regex regex = new Regex(@": {(\r|\n| )*""_type"": ""System.DBNull*"); | ||
| Match match = regex.Match(sData); | ||
| if (match.Success) | ||
| if ((jt as JProperty).Name != "_id") | ||
| { | ||
| if (jt.HasValues) | ||
| string sData = jt.ToString(); | ||
| Regex regex = new Regex(@": {(\r|\n| )*""_type"": ""System.DBNull*"); | ||
| Match match = regex.Match(sData); | ||
| if (match.Success) | ||
| { | ||
| string name = (jt as JProperty).Name; | ||
| var aa = jt as JProperty; | ||
| aa.Value = ""; | ||
| if (jt.HasValues) | ||
| { | ||
| string name = (jt as JProperty).Name; | ||
| var aa = jt as JProperty; | ||
| aa.Value = ""; | ||
| } | ||
| jo2.Add(jt); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| jo2.Add(jt); | ||
| } | ||
| jo2.Add(jt); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| array.Add(jo2); | ||
| } | ||
| // JSON to Datatable | ||
| dataTable = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<DataTable>(array.ToString()); | ||
| if (dataTable != null && dataTable.Columns.Count > 0) | ||
| { | ||
| DataTable dt = dataTable; | ||
| bool dosort = true; | ||
| DataTable dt2 = dataTable.Clone(); | ||
| foreach (DataRow dr in dataTable.Rows) | ||
| { | ||
| if (Convert.ToString(dr["GINGER_ID"]) == "") | ||
| { | ||
| dosort = false; | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| jo2.Add(jt); | ||
| dt2.ImportRow(dr); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| array.Add(jo2); | ||
| } | ||
| // JSON to Datatable | ||
| dataTable = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<DataTable>(array.ToString()); | ||
| if (dataTable != null && dataTable.Columns.Count > 0) | ||
| { | ||
| DataTable dt = dataTable; | ||
| bool dosort = true; | ||
| DataTable dt2 = dataTable.Clone(); | ||
| foreach (DataRow dr in dataTable.Rows) | ||
| { | ||
| if (Convert.ToString(dr["GINGER_ID"]) == "") | ||
| if (dosort) | ||
| { | ||
| dosort = false; | ||
| dt2.AcceptChanges(); | ||
| DataView dv = dt2.DefaultView; | ||
| dv.Sort = "GINGER_ID ASC"; | ||
|
|
||
| dt = dv.ToTable(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.ImportRow(dr); | ||
| dt.Rows.RemoveAt(0); | ||
| } | ||
| dt.TableName = query; | ||
| dataTable = dt; | ||
| var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(array); | ||
| } | ||
| if (dosort) | ||
| { | ||
| dt2.AcceptChanges(); | ||
| DataView dv = dt2.DefaultView; | ||
| dv.Sort = "GINGER_ID ASC"; | ||
|
|
||
| dt = dv.ToTable(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| dt.Rows.RemoveAt(0); | ||
| } | ||
| dt.TableName = query; | ||
| dataTable = dt; | ||
| var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(array); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Exception Occurred while doing LiteDB GetQueryOutput", ex); | ||
| db.Dispose(); | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Exception Occurred while doing LiteDB GetQueryOutput", ex); | ||
| db.Dispose(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Exception Occurred while doing LiteDB GetQueryOutput", ex); | ||
| db.Dispose(); | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Exception Occurred while doing LiteDB GetQueryOutput", ex); | ||
| db.Dispose(); | ||
| } | ||
| dataTable.AcceptChanges(); | ||
| return dataTable; | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The GetQueryOutput method is quite complex and could benefit from refactoring for clarity and maintainability. It contains nested try-catch blocks and multiple paths that could be simplified. Additionally, the method uses direct SQL execution, which could be prone to SQL injection if not properly sanitized. Ensure that the input query is sanitized before execution.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| // SQL Command needed here: | ||
| var result = db.Execute(query); | ||
| } | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| using (LiteDatabase db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| // SQL Command needed here: | ||
| var result = db.Execute(query); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The RunQuery method correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim to ensure thread safety. However, the method returns true unconditionally, even if the execution of the query fails. Consider returning the result of the query execution or handling exceptions to provide accurate feedback.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| // SQL query needed here | ||
| var resultdxs = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in resultdxs) | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| string result = null; | ||
| using (LiteDatabase db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| BsonDocument aa = bs.AsDocument; | ||
| foreach (KeyValuePair<string, BsonValue> keyval in aa.RawValue) | ||
| // SQL query needed here | ||
| var resultdxs = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in resultdxs) | ||
| { | ||
| result = keyval.Value.RawValue.ToString(); | ||
| BsonDocument aa = bs.AsDocument; | ||
| foreach (KeyValuePair<string, BsonValue> keyval in aa.RawValue) | ||
| { | ||
| result = keyval.Value.RawValue.ToString(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The GetResultString method correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim to ensure thread safety. However, the method iterates over the results and overwrites the result variable in each iteration, which means only the last result will be returned. If this is the intended behavior, it should be documented; otherwise, consider if a different approach is needed.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| //SQL command needed here | ||
|
|
||
| var resultdxs = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in resultdxs) | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| object result = null; | ||
| using (LiteDatabase db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| result = bs.RawValue; | ||
| //SQL command needed here | ||
|
|
||
| var resultdxs = db.Execute(query).ToArray(); | ||
| foreach (BsonValue bs in resultdxs) | ||
| { | ||
| result = bs.RawValue; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The GetResult method correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim to ensure thread safety. Similar to GetResultString, it overwrites the result variable in each iteration, which may not be the intended behavior.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| dataTable.DefaultView.Sort = "GINGER_ID"; | ||
| var table = db.GetCollection(dataTable.ToString()); | ||
| SaveTable(dataTable , table); | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| using (LiteDatabase db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| dataTable.DefaultView.Sort = "GINGER_ID"; | ||
| var table = db.GetCollection(dataTable.ToString()); | ||
| SaveTable(dataTable, table); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SaveTable method correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim to ensure thread safety. However, the method does not handle the case where dataTable.GetChanges() returns null, which would result in a NullReferenceException when calling changed.Rows.Count. Ensure that this case is handled properly.
| try | ||
| { | ||
| var table = db.GetCollection(TName); | ||
| LiteDBLock.Wait(); | ||
| using (LiteDatabase db = new LiteDatabase(ConnectionString)) | ||
| { | ||
| var table = db.GetCollection(TName); | ||
|
|
||
| List<string> ColumnList = GetColumnList(table.FindAll().ToList() , TName); | ||
| table.DeleteAll(); | ||
| List<BsonDocument> batch = new List<BsonDocument>(); | ||
| List<string> ColumnList = GetColumnList(table.FindAll().ToList(), TName); | ||
| table.DeleteAll(); | ||
| List<BsonDocument> batch = new List<BsonDocument>(); | ||
|
|
||
| var doc = new BsonDocument(); | ||
| var doc = new BsonDocument(); | ||
|
|
||
| for (int i = 0; i < ColumnList.Count; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| doc[ColumnList[i]] = ""; | ||
| } | ||
| table.Insert(doc); | ||
|
|
||
| for (int i = 0; i < ColumnList.Count; i++) | ||
| { | ||
| doc[ColumnList[i]] = ""; | ||
| } | ||
| table.Insert(doc); | ||
|
|
||
| isDeleteAllExecuted = false; | ||
| } | ||
| finally | ||
| { | ||
| LiteDBLock.Release(); | ||
|
|
||
| isDeleteAllExecuted = false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The DeleteDBTableContents method correctly uses the SemaphoreSlim to ensure thread safety. However, the method inserts a new document with empty values for all columns after deleting all documents. This behavior should be documented or reconsidered if it's not necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (5)
- 4409-4417: The introduction of
maxAttemptsandattemptCountvariables, along with the nested try-catch block for counting window handles, is a good approach for improving the robustness of theIsRunningmethod. However, ensure that the logic for incrementingattemptCountis consistent and error-proof across the entire method to avoid premature exits or infinite loops.- 4473-4487: Catching specific exceptions like
NoSuchWindowExceptionand logging them is a good practice for debugging and understanding the flow of execution. However, ensure that the logic for handling these exceptions, including incrementingattemptCountand continuing the loop, is consistent and does not lead to logic errors or infinite loops.- 4489-4502: Handling
WebDriverTimeoutExceptionwith specific logging and decision-making based on the current window handle is appropriate. Again, pay attention to the incrementation ofattemptCountto ensure it's handled correctly across all exception types.- 4504-4518: The handling of
WebDriverExceptionwith specific checks forPreviousRunStoppedand the message content is a good example of detailed error handling. However, ensure that the logic for incrementingattemptCountand potentially closing the driver is clear and does not introduce unintended behavior.- 6699-6746: The refactoring of
CheckifPageLoadedto useWebDriverWaitis a significant improvement in reliability and performance over the previous loop-based method. Keeping the old method commented out for future reference, as per the user's request, is acknowledged. However, ensure that this approach aligns with your team's code maintenance and documentation practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/CoreDrivers/Web/Selenium/SeleniumDriver.cs (4)
- 4409-4410: The introduction of
maxAttemptsandattemptCountvariables is a good practice for managing retries in a loop. This approach allows for a clear and adjustable retry mechanism.- 4412-4417: The loop structure for retrying based on
attemptCountandmaxAttemptsis correctly implemented. However, ensure that the catch blocks inside this loop correctly manageattemptCountto prevent multiple increments per iteration.- 6699-6734: The commented-out
CheckifPageLoadedmethod is retained for future reference or use, as per the user's request. While it's typically recommended to use version control systems for maintaining historical code, the decision to keep it within the source files for convenience is respected.- 6735-6746: The refactoring of the
CheckifPageLoadedmethod to useWebDriverWaitis a significant improvement for reliability and performance. This change aligns with best practices for Selenium WebDriver, ensuring that the page load is properly waited for before proceeding.
| else if (count > 0) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | ||
|
|
||
| if(attemptCount < maxAttempts) | ||
| { | ||
| exceptioncount++; | ||
| return (IsRunning()); | ||
| attemptCount++; | ||
| continue; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The logic to return true if count > 0 is straightforward and effective. However, the incrementation of attemptCount and the continuation of the loop should be carefully managed to ensure that it only happens once per iteration, as previously discussed. Consider refactoring this logic to avoid duplication and potential errors.
- if(attemptCount < maxAttempts)
- {
- attemptCount++;
- continue;
- }
+ // Ensure attemptCount is incremented once per iteration outside of catch blocks.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| else if (count > 0) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| else | |
| { | |
| if (exceptioncount < 5) | |
| if(attemptCount < maxAttempts) | |
| { | |
| exceptioncount++; | |
| return (IsRunning()); | |
| attemptCount++; | |
| continue; | |
| else if (count > 0) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| // Ensure attemptCount is incremented once per iteration outside of catch blocks. |
|
|
||
| if (count == 0) | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The check for count == 0 to return false is redundant given the earlier check in the method. This could be simplified or removed to improve code readability and efficiency.
- if (count == 0)
- {
- return false;
- }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| if (count == 0) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| } |
| catch (Exception ex2) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | ||
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | ||
| { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| CloseDriver(); | ||
| break; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Catching a generic Exception and making decisions based on the message content is a risky approach due to potential localization issues or changes in the exception messages. Consider more robust ways to determine the nature of the exception.
- if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG"))
+ // Consider using specific exception types or other indicators rather than relying on message content.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| catch (Exception ex2) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | |
| if (ex2.Message.ToString().ToUpper().Contains("DIALOG")) | |
| { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; | |
| catch (Exception ex2) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, "Exception occurred when we are checking IsRunning", ex2); | |
| // Consider using specific exception types or other indicators rather than relying on message content. | |
| CloseDriver(); | |
| break; |
2 participants
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit