docs(sdlc): tighten harness architecture boundaries#1454
Merged
limityan merged 1 commit intoJul 7, 2026
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
docs/sdlc-harnessboundaries against the latest product architecture docs.Fixes: N/A
Type and Areas
Type: docs
Areas: docs, architecture, SDLC Harness
Motivation / Impact
This addresses architecture-review findings where SDLC Harness docs could be read as over-designing early phases, assigning Quality Data Plane too much ownership, or replacing the product architecture P0 plugin runtime slice with a future-only contract.
No runtime or schema behavior changes are introduced. The docs now state that product runtime P0 still needs the Desktop settings/command + CLI diagnostics OpenCode-compatible plugin vertical slice, while writable JS/TS plugin runtime, non-Desktop/CLI full runtime, ACP permission bridge, and ecosystem-wide compatibility remain separate product decisions after that slice.
Verification
Readywith no findings.git fetch gcwing main --prunegit rev-list --left-right --count HEAD...gcwing/main->1 0rgscan for old conflicting SDLC Harness boundary wording -> no matchesgit diff --check-> exit 0; only LF-to-CRLF working-copy warningsRuntime tests were not run because this PR changes documentation only.
Reviewer Notes
P0+in the plugin context is explicitly disambiguated from SDLC Harness P1.Checklist