Skip to content

fix: route ordering in auth routes#5661

Merged
0xi4o merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/sso
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

fix: route ordering in auth routes#5661
0xi4o merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/sso

Conversation

@0xi4o
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@0xi4o 0xi4o commented Jan 21, 2026

  • Wrong route order was causing /api/v1/auth/sso-successendpoint to be handled by the getAllPermissionsendpoint.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @0xi4o, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical routing issue within the authentication module. By adjusting the order in which routes are defined, it resolves a conflict where a specific SSO success endpoint was being incorrectly processed by a more general permissions endpoint, thereby ensuring proper request handling and system stability.

Highlights

  • Route Ordering Fix: Reordered authentication routes to ensure the /api/v1/auth/sso-success endpoint is correctly handled, preventing it from being mistakenly routed to the getAllPermissions endpoint.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a routing precedence issue by reordering the Express.js routes. By placing the more specific /sso-success route before the more general /:type route, it ensures that requests to /api/v1/auth/sso-success are handled by the ssoSuccess controller, preventing them from being incorrectly caught by getAllPermissions. This is a necessary and effective fix.

@0xi4o 0xi4o merged commit 69fb14e into main Jan 21, 2026
6 checks passed
@0xi4o 0xi4o deleted the fix/sso branch January 21, 2026 11:32
@ilmaya0211
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a routing precedence issue by reordering the Express.js routes. By placing the more specific /sso-success route before the more general /:type route, it ensures that requests to /api/v1/auth/sso-success are handled by the ssoSuccess controller, preventing them from being incorrectly caught by getAllPermissions. This is a necessary and effective fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants