Fixes #827 xASL_module_Population: avoid running parallelized#838
Fixes #827 xASL_module_Population: avoid running parallelized#838MichaelStritt merged 11 commits intodevelopfrom
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems good to me 👍
Did you test it?
Edit: during the last release we agreed on describing how to test and/or to show a small test that you ran, so that we do not have to fix that many bugs during the release
Edit2: please also fill in the release notes
|
@HenkMutsaerts: I did some minor changes:
Do you know a nice way to test all of this? |
|
Nice!
|
I mean, you wrote the comment that the following part is legacy code that should be removed later on. I think it would be the wrong signal if we just add a small subfunction and we say we can't do this because we don't know how to test this. I checked the IO parameters, they seem to be fine. I can run the unit testing and the test datasets at the AMC. Just thought that you might have something simpler in mind. |
Unit testing |
10 test datasets |
MichaelStritt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As can be seen in the unit testing and the 10 test datasets, everything should be fine. The deviations from the correct values in the 10 test datasets are because this branch does not have the up-to-date reference table.
…bility mask Which is equal to the brainmask
…of x.Q.Sequence
c57d407 to
5a888b9
Compare
Linked issue
Closes #827