Skip to content

[NO QA] chore: upgrade TypeScript to version ^6.0.2#87771

Merged
roryabraham merged 20 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:dariusz-biela/chore/upgrade-ts-6
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

[NO QA] chore: upgrade TypeScript to version ^6.0.2#87771
roryabraham merged 20 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:dariusz-biela/chore/upgrade-ts-6

Conversation

@dariusz-biela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela commented Apr 13, 2026

Explanation of Change

Upgrade TypeScript from 5.9.x to 6.0.2 and update related tooling to ensure compatibility.

Core changes:

  • Upgrade typescript to ^6.0.2
  • Upgrade typescript-eslint to ^8.58.1 (TS6 support since 8.58.0)
  • Upgrade ts-jest to ^29.4.9 (TS6 support since 29.4.7)

TS6 breaking changes addressed:

  • noUncheckedSideEffectImports now defaults to true: Added src/types/modules/css.d.ts to declare *.css module types for all CSS side-effect imports (mapbox, onfido, storybook)
  • baseUrl deprecated: Removed baseUrl from tsconfig.json and subsidiary tsconfigs. Moved the tests/* path alias (previously relying on baseUrl) into explicit paths mapping
  • rootDir default changed from inferred to .: Added explicit rootDir to scripts/tsconfig.json and root tsconfig.json's ts-node section, since ts-node internally disables noEmit which triggers TS6's rootDir enforcement
  • Deprecated options cleanup: Removed allowSyntheticDefaultImports (always true in TS6), DOM.Iterable from lib (included in DOM in TS6), downlevelIteration, and migrated moduleResolution: "node" to "node16" in subsidiary tsconfigs
  • prefer-optional-chain: typescript-eslint 8.58.1 with TS6's deeper type analysis detects more cases — fixed all violations across ~70 files

Config consolidation:

  • Deleted tsconfig.tsgo.jsontsgo now uses the main tsconfig.json directly with CLI flags (--noEmit --incremental --tsBuildInfoFile), eliminating config drift

Fixed Issues

$ #83349
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A - This is a build tooling upgrade with no runtime behavior changes.

QA Steps

N/A - This is a build tooling upgrade with no runtime behavior changes.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native image
iOS: Native image
MacOS: Chrome / Safari image

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 13, 2026

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 14, 2026

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela changed the title chore: upgrade TypeScript to version ^6.0.2 [NO QA] chore: upgrade TypeScript to version ^6.0.2 Apr 14, 2026
Comment thread .github/tsconfig.json
Comment thread scripts/tsconfig.json
Comment thread tsconfig.json
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@staszekscp staszekscp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Please, only have a look at the node compatibility that Rory has pointed out

@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2026 13:21
@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela requested review from a team as code owners April 15, 2026 13:21
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from a team, DylanDylann and joekaufmanexpensify and removed request for a team April 15, 2026 13:21
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

@DylanDylann Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from youssef-lr and removed request for a team April 15, 2026 13:22
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

@youssef-lr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9e8e99debf

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".


useEffect(() => {
if (!email || !primaryContactMethod || primaryContactMethod.toLowerCase() !== email.toLowerCase() || isWorkEmailValidated) {
if (primaryContactMethod?.toLowerCase() !== email?.toLowerCase() || isWorkEmailValidated) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Restore empty-value guard before verification redirect

This condition is no longer equivalent to the previous one: when both email and primaryContactMethod are empty strings, primaryContactMethod?.toLowerCase() !== email?.toLowerCase() evaluates to false, so the effect now falls through and navigates to the verify-work-email route even though no email was entered. Because usePrimaryContactMethod() defaults to '', this can happen on initial render/loading and incorrectly redirect users from the add-work-email page.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have to be careful with eslint auto fix in this case, because sometimes it can make this stupid logical error

@roryabraham
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dariusz-biela ESLint is failing

@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2026 18:58
@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela force-pushed the dariusz-biela/chore/upgrade-ts-6 branch from 688761b to c38c04e Compare April 15, 2026 19:48
@dariusz-biela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The history of this branch has diverged from main (which is why there are so many change lines in it), I will fix it tomorrow.

@joekaufmanexpensify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No product review needed

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify removed their request for review April 15, 2026 21:49
Remove baseUrl, downlevelIteration, allowSyntheticDefaultImports,
esModuleInterop (all deprecated/redundant in TS6). Migrate module
and moduleResolution from commonjs/node to node16/node16.
Fix prefer-optional-chain violations in ReportActionsUtils,
Policy.ts, and Report/index.ts detected by typescript-eslint 8.58.1.
Fix prefer-optional-chain in ReportUtils, IOU/index,
SplitExpensePage, and WorkspacesListPage.
…-effect

Derive selectedOption from state fallback chain instead of syncing
via useEffect, fixing new eslint rule violation.
- useSearchBulkActions: simplify !policy || !policy.achAccount to !policy?.achAccount
- WorkspaceExpensifyCardAddWorkEmailPage: suppress with eslint-disable,
  optional chain changes logic when both values are falsy
Same prefer-optional-chain autofix bug: optional chain drops early
return when both email and primaryContactMethod are falsy, causing
incorrect navigation.
@dariusz-biela dariusz-biela force-pushed the dariusz-biela/chore/upgrade-ts-6 branch from c38c04e to 7583328 Compare April 16, 2026 09:17
Optional chain removes the empty-string guard for session.email,
causing a false positive "same as signup email" error when both
emails are empty.
@dariusz-biela
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@roryabraham

I performed a rebase and fixed the Git history.

Then I manually checked all instances of prefer-optional-chain that had been changed by the ESLint auto-fix. It turned out that the logic had changed in three places. I reverted them to their previous state and added an eslint-disable rule with an explanation of why.

Then I ran Claude Code to check all the changes for maintaining the previous logic, and it didn’t find any additional errors.

I believe this PR is fully ready for final review.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same for the other sites where lint is disabled - I'm confident there are solutions that maintain existing logic without requiring us to suppress lint.

const domain = emailParts.at(1) ?? '';

// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/prefer-optional-chain -- optional chain removes the falsy guard for empty strings, causing a false positive when both emails are empty
if (session?.email && userEmail.toLowerCase() === session.email.toLowerCase() && !isOffline) {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm on a mission to denormalize suppressing lint - let's avoid it in this case because there's another way:

Suggested change
if (session?.email && userEmail.toLowerCase() === session.email.toLowerCase() && !isOffline) {
if (session?.email !== "" && userEmail.toLowerCase() === session?.email.toLowerCase() && !isOffline) {

The rule's --fix introduces logic bugs by converting falsy guards
to optional chains, removing protection against empty strings and
nullish values. Workarounds (eslint-disable comments, magic-string
hacks) are worse than the original code. Disabling the rule and
removing all related eslint-disable comments.
roryabraham
roryabraham previously approved these changes Apr 17, 2026
@roryabraham
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Awaiting C+ checklist from @DylanDylann

Comment thread src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts
Comment on lines 1301 to 1306
function getXeroTenants(policy: Policy | undefined): Tenant[] {
// Due to the way optional chain is being handled in this useMemo we are forced to use this approach to properly handle undefined values
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/prefer-optional-chain
if (!policy || !policy.connections || !policy.connections.xero || !policy.connections.xero.data) {
return [];
}
return policy.connections.xero.data.tenants ?? [];
}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

function getXeroTenants(policy: Policy | undefined): Tenant[] {
    return policy?.connections?.xero?.data?.tenants ?? [];
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dariusz-biela Is there any reason why we don't update this place?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was an implementation from before this PR, which is why I missed the opportunity to optimize it.

We can actually simplify this.

I've already added a commit for this.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from roryabraham April 20, 2026 05:20
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

One minor comment: #87771 (comment)

The rest looks fine to me

Replace verbose nullish guards with optional chaining as the behavior
is identical — all intermediate properties are objects, so falsy checks
and optional chaining handle the same undefined/null cases.
@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 45d6ada into Expensify:main Apr 20, 2026
42 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @roryabraham has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.3.61-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR upgrades TypeScript from 5.9.x to 6.0.2 and updates related build tooling (typescript-eslint, ts-jest, tsconfig options). All changes are strictly developer tooling and build configuration — there are no runtime behavior changes, no new features, no UI changes, and no changes to user-facing functionality.

No help site documentation changes are required.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.3.61-4 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants