Thank you for your contribution! I wonder why the jump entries are designed to use absolute address instead of relative address? Does Loongarch Linux not support ASLR?

Loongarch Linux supports ASLR. When I use relative addresses in Rust's inline assembly, I find that the values ​​in jump entry are all 0, so I use absolute addresses instead.

It's strange. Maybe an LLVM bug?

Anyway, using absolute addresses here is not suitable for applications with ASLR enabled, since those addresses may be relocated somewhere else at run time.

Maybe I can ask someone at loongarch.

The cross-rs tool currently uses the gnu toolchain for linking, but the version of binutils is low and does not support the relocation of R_LARCH_64_PCREL, so error occurs in calculating relative addresses. I can change the code to calculate relative addresses, but that might not pass the cross test.

Is there any tracking issue for this problem at Rust main repository or cross-rs repo or anywhere else? I could track it and merge the PR after corresponding issue is solved.

Maybe this cross-rs/cross#973

Thanks for your contribution to LoongArch. This is the tracking issue for this: cross-rs/cross#1538

It seems that the cross-rs has updated the binutils toolchain. Would you update your code for relative addresses? :)

Thank you :)