Skip to content

Paper review 2026-08-04: 25 candidates #350

Open

Description

@github-actions

Reply with commands, one per line:
/approve all · /approve 1,3-5 · /reject 2 · /edit 3 category=world_terminal tags=benchmark (edit implies approve; tags=- clears tags). Valid category keys: see taxonomy.json.

Auto-skipped 405 out-of-scope; 0 failed (retried next run).

1. Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review

Vaibhava Lakshmi Ravideshik, Mayank Kejriwal · arXiv 2026/04 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical benchmark

Proposes an automated multi-model LLM peer-review protocol to benchmark and compare autonomous AI Scientist research-generation systems (Sakana AI, CycleResearcher, Data-to-Paper) against a commercial baseline. Establishes a quantitative benchmark for evaluating the quality of AI-generated scientific papers.
An empirical benchmarking study whose object is autonomous research (AI Scientist) agents themselves, not a new agent performing a code task.

2. Unanticipated Effects of Generative AI on Expertise Pathways and Performance Perception in System Administration

Rana Abou Khamis, Hala Assal, Ashraf Matrawy · arXiv 2026/06 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

An interview-based study of 14 IT professionals examining how GenAI reshapes system-administration practice, finding compressed expertise-development pathways and shifting productivity-perception norms. Explores socio-technical effects of GenAI-assisted troubleshooting and scripting rather than proposing a new agent.
An empirical/behavioral study of human-agent interaction and adoption in sysadmin practice, matching the studies leaf's real-user usage-in-the-wild scope.

3. Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures

Harsh Raj, Vipul Gupta, Anas Mahmoud, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

Proposes an interaction-centric taxonomy of 41 agent failure modes that localizes faults to specific component interactions (model, harness, environment, grader) across coding assistants, personal assistants, and multi-agent systems. Validates reproducibility of the taxonomy using LLM judges against human labels.
Cross-cutting taxonomy studying agent failures across many agent types/worlds, not tied to one activity and proposing no task-performing method.

4. Building a Process-Modeling Tool using Agentic AI: An Experience Report on PM4Py-UCM

Daniel Amyot · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

An experience report mining the development record of PM4Py-UCM, a process-mining tool built largely by an AI coding agent (Claude Code), characterizing human turns, agent corrections, and code-quality outcomes across 18 sessions and 65 hours. Contributes a reproducible taxonomy of human-agent interaction patterns and lessons for responsibly engineering AI-built tools.
An empirical case study of human-agent interaction during AI-assisted software construction, proposing no generalizable method, matching the studies leaf.

5. The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study

Amr Mohamed, Maram Assi, Mariam Guizani · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: survey

Systematic review and mapping of 39 studies examining how LLM-assistants affect software developer productivity across coding, testing, debugging, and documentation tasks. Finds mixed evidence on code quality and highlights gaps in longitudinal and team-based evaluation.
Field-wide empirical/survey study whose object is code-agent tool usage and developer productivity, matching the studies leaf.

6. Agentic Coding in the Wild: Characterizing GitHub Copilot Traces at Production Scale

Banruo Liu, Haoran Qiu, Íñigo Goiri, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

A production-scale empirical characterization of GitHub Copilot agentic coding traces (3.2M users, 761M LLM calls), analyzing session structure, KV-cache behavior, and idle-time patterns to inform agent-native serving infrastructure. It derives a lightweight idle-time predictor from these workload observations.
An empirical/behavioral study whose object is the coding-agent workload itself, not a proposed task-performing agent.

7. Cross-Benchmark Generalization in Long-Horizon Agents

Sushant Mehta, Logan Ritchie, Liudas Panavas, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

Post-trains a mixture-of-experts model on long-horizon MCP tool-use tasks via SFT+RL and measures transfer to held-out benchmarks (Toolathlon, tau2-Bench, BFCL-V4, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2), finding consistent gains. A paired-trajectory analysis identifies recurring behavioral changes (goal formation, state tracking, verification) that generalize across domains.
Object of study is cross-benchmark behavioral generalization of trained agents, an empirical study spanning both artifact and agency benchmarks rather than one task.

8. CurveShift: Is Agent Progress Scalar? Separating Level from Shape

Hanwen Xing, Pengyun Wang, BingXu Meng, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical benchmark

An empirical analysis disentangling whether LLM/agent capability gains reflect genuine shifts in the difficulty-response curve versus ceiling effects, using LiveCodeBench to isolate a real hard-problem effect since September 2024. Releases a new LiveCodeBench Difficulty Panel and analysis code.
The paper's object of study is measuring and explaining agent/model capability trends, not proposing a task-performing agent, matching the empirical studies leaf.

9. AgenTag: Attribution of AI Coding Agents from Behavioral Fingerprints

Taher A. Ghaleb · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

AgenTag is a multimodal classifier that attributes pull requests to specific AI coding agents using textual, behavioral, and code-diff signals, evaluated on thousands of real PRs. It finds that agents are distinguished mainly by communication style rather than code content, even after removing self-disclosed markers.
Empirically studies behavioral fingerprints of coding agents in the wild rather than proposing an agent that writes or executes code.

10. Prompt-Induced Waste in Large Reasoning Models: A Preregistered Two-Harness Benchmark of Coding Agents

Sarel Weinberger, Amir Hozez · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

A preregistered benchmark measuring how prompt wording and agent harness choice affect reasoning-token cost of coding agents across six LRMs and 24 deterministic coding tasks. Finds certain prompts multiply reasoning cost without improving correctness, and harness design causes large cost variance.
An empirical/behavioral study of coding-agent cost and prompting practices, not a method proposing a task-performing agent.

11. Post-Training on Office Work Improves Software Engineering: A Behavioral Account of Cross-Domain Transfer

Logan Ritchie, Sushant Mehta, Liudas Panavas, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

This paper post-trains an agent on long-horizon office-workflow tasks (no software engineering data) and finds unexpected improvement on SWE-Bench Pro, then behaviorally analyzes the transfer via goal-directed execution behaviors. It offers a behavioral account of cross-domain generalization rather than a new task-specific tool.
The paper's object is empirical behavioral analysis of agent transfer across domains, not a proposed task-specific agent or resource, fitting the empirical-study branch.

12. Long-Horizon Autonomous Architecture Research with a Language-Model Agent: A Behavioural Case Study

Aon Safdar, Mohamed Saadeldin · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: empirical

A behavioral case study tracking a single LLM agent autonomously conducting long-horizon neural architecture research over ~100 experiments. It reports productivity phase patterns, saturation and recovery dynamics, and how workflow design shaped the agent's research behavior.
Object of study is the agent's behavior/process during research, not a proposed method to perform the task, matching the studies/empirical precedent.

13. ACEM: A Cost Estimation Model for Agentic Software Engineering

Mohammad El-Ramly · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: studies · tags: position

ACEM proposes a cost estimation framework for agentic software engineering that decomposes development cost into LLM, human-in-the-loop, and infrastructure dimensions, mapping traditional sizing metrics to token consumption estimates.
A position/framework paper whose object is the economics and practice of agentic software engineering, not a task-performing agent, so it fits studies.

14. Preventing Premature Commitment in Coding Agents with an Evidence-Conditioned Execution Layer

Yisen Xu, Chenglin Li, Zehao Wang, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

ECLoop is an execution layer that enforces evidence-conditioned execution, postponing code edits or patch submissions by coding agents until repository evidence conditions are met. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it raises Pass@1 by 4.8-11.8 points while lowering token consumption.
Improves issue-resolution/patch-submission behavior on SWE-bench, so routes to debugging.

15. Validation Evidence in LLM Repair Agents: How Much of What Passes Actually Tests the Bug?

Xiaonan Xu, Wenjing Wu · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: empirical

BSG-VA replays repair-agent test validations against buggy, candidate, and gold-fix code states to measure how often a passing test actually discriminates the reported bug, finding nearly half of positive evidence in LLM repair trajectories is uninformative. A feedback intervention returning buggy-state replay results modestly reduces evidence-inadequate patch closures.
Centered on diagnosing and improving evidence quality within program-repair agent pipelines, a single activity (software_debugging).

16. To Add Is Machine, To Delete Is Human: Measuring and Mitigating Deletion Avoidance in LLM Code Editing

Amir M. Ebrahimi, Mohammed Mehedi Hasan, Aaditya Bhatia, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: empirical benchmark

An empirical study of 'deletion avoidance' in LLM code editing, showing frontier models on SWE-bench Verified frequently fail to delete required code, often wrapping it in guards instead. Introduces CanItDelete, a benchmark of pure-deletion repair tasks, and shows post-training can mitigate the behavior.
Measures and benchmarks a failure mode in SWE-bench-style issue-resolution patches, so it routes to software_debugging plus benchmark tag.

17. Reusing Past Repairs Through Hierarchical Trajectory Abstraction for Coding Agents

Yisen Xu, Jiayuan Zhou, Ruiqi Pan, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

STAIR converts historical repair trajectories into hierarchical, reusable multi-level plans that guide coding agents on new issues, improving Pass@1 on SWE-bench Verified across multiple agent backbones including a structurally different agent without code changes.
Directly serves SWE-bench-style repository issue resolution via reusable repair strategies.

18. ReLog: Execution-Aware Logging with Runtime Feedback for LLM-Oriented Debugging

Xin Wang, Yang Feng, Xiaoqian Jiao, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

ReLog is an LLM-driven framework that iteratively generates, executes, evaluates, and refines logging statements using runtime feedback, evaluated on defect localization and repair via Defects4J.
An agentic code-generation/execution loop serving debugging (fault localization and repair), matching software_debuggings dynamic-analysis debugging-assistant scope.

19. Turning Interaction History into Execution State: A Runtime Layer for Long-Horizon Coding Agents

Zehao Wang, Yisen Xu, Chenglin Li, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

Ledger is a deterministic runtime layer that tracks execution state (observed, modified, attempted) for long-horizon coding agents, preventing redundant or stale actions during repository work. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it improves Pass@1 while cutting cost across multiple LLM-based coding agents.
Evaluated on SWE-bench issue-resolution tasks, so it serves software_debugging per benchmark routing.

20. SVRepair: Structured Visual Reasoning for Automated Program Repair

Jincheng Wang, Liwei Luo, Xiaoxuan Tang, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

SVRepair is a multimodal automated program repair framework that converts visual bug artifacts (screenshots, control-flow graphs) into structured scene graphs to guide a coding agent's fault localization and patch synthesis. It is evaluated on SWE-Bench M and OmniGIRL, improving repair rates over unimodal baselines.
An agent that localizes faults and synthesizes patches for reported bugs is issue resolution/APR.

21. HarnessCompass: Guiding Automatic Harness Evolution toward Generalizable and Effective Agent Harnesses

Luan Zhang, Ruochen Zhou, Dandan Song, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: none

HarnessCompass automatically evolves LLM agent harnesses using constrained, component-wise optimization guided by proactive agent feedback, improving generalization over prior harness-evolution methods. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it raises GPT-5.4 Pass@1 from 54% to 66% in five iterations.
Improves a coding agent's scaffolding and is evaluated on SWE-bench issue resolution, routing to that activity per benchmark-routing rule.

22. SWE-Touch: Benchmarking Coding Agents When Users Touch the Code

Yuqiao Tan, Jinxiang Meng, Fangyu Lei, et al. · arXiv 2026/08 · paper
proposed: software_debugging · tags: benchmark

SWE-Touch is a benchmark that stress-tests coding agents on SWE-bench-style issue resolution when users concurrently edit task-relevant code, via injected 'Counter-Edits.' It shows current agents lack sufficient workspace awareness, degrading resolve rates on shared-workspace repair tasks.
Evaluates issue-resolution coding agents on repository repair tasks (SWE-bench Verified/Pro), matching software_debugging.

23. Looks Right, Works Right: A Project-Level Benchmark for Multi-Screen Mobile App Generation

Fan Wu, Cuiyun Gao, Yiming Huang, et al. · arXiv 2026/05 · paper
proposed: software_code_generation · tags: benchmark

MobileForge is a project-level benchmark for generating complete multi-screen mobile apps from designs, testing buildability, cross-page navigation, visual fidelity, and maintainability. It evaluates six frontier multimodal LLMs and finds navigation and maintainability still lag behind compilable output.
Whole-application generation from a specification is software_code_generation per the repo/whole-app generation-from-scratch boundary.

24. Simulation Code Generation for Fluid Systems using Large Language Models: Benchmarking Models and Prompting Strategies

Jan Marius Stürmer, Jascha Knack, Tobias Koch, et al. · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_code_generation · tags: benchmark

Benchmarks ten LLMs and six prompting strategies for translating a neutral graph representation of fluid system models into executable simulation code for WNTR and Modelica. Evaluates generated code via software-quality metrics and functional fidelity against benchmark scenarios.
Task is producing domain-specific simulation code from a specification, matching software_code_generation.

25. AuditCoder: Responsibility-Preserving Task Graphs for Auditable Code Generation and Bounded Repair

Kangjie Huang, Chen Lyu · arXiv 2026/07 · paper
proposed: software_code_generation · tags: none

AuditCoder generates code alongside an auditable construction trace using contract-annotated task graphs that assign stable responsibility identities, enabling bounded repair localized to failing regions. Evaluated on APPS and ClassEval, it achieves competitive pass@1 while providing high decision-code trace coverage.
The served task is producing code from specifications on APPS/ClassEval benchmarks, matching software_code_generation.

machine payload (do not edit)
[{"paper": {"id": "2607.28631", "title": "Can AI Evaluate AI Scientists? A Benchmarking Study of Autonomous Research Generation Systems Using Automated Multi-Model Review", "authors": ["Vaibhava Lakshmi Ravideshik", "Mayank Kejriwal"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/04", "category": "", "published": "2026-04-18", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28631", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical", "benchmark"], "summary": "Proposes an automated multi-model LLM peer-review protocol to benchmark and compare autonomous AI Scientist research-generation systems (Sakana AI, CycleResearcher, Data-to-Paper) against a commercial baseline. Establishes a quantitative benchmark for evaluating the quality of AI-generated scientific papers.", "reason": "An empirical benchmarking study whose object is autonomous research (AI Scientist) agents themselves, not a new agent performing a code task.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28650", "title": "Unanticipated Effects of Generative AI on Expertise Pathways and Performance Perception in System Administration", "authors": ["Rana Abou Khamis", "Hala Assal", "Ashraf Matrawy"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/06", "category": "", "published": "2026-06-02", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28650", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "An interview-based study of 14 IT professionals examining how GenAI reshapes system-administration practice, finding compressed expertise-development pathways and shifting productivity-perception norms. Explores socio-technical effects of GenAI-assisted troubleshooting and scripting rather than proposing a new agent.", "reason": "An empirical/behavioral study of human-agent interaction and adoption in sysadmin practice, matching the studies leaf's real-user usage-in-the-wild scope.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28802", "title": "Model or Harness? An Interaction-Centric Taxonomy for Localizing Agent Failures", "authors": ["Harsh Raj", "Vipul Gupta", "Anas Mahmoud", "Razvan-Gabriel Dumitru", "Darvin Yi", "Aakash Sabharwal", "Yunzhong He"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28802", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "Proposes an interaction-centric taxonomy of 41 agent failure modes that localizes faults to specific component interactions (model, harness, environment, grader) across coding assistants, personal assistants, and multi-agent systems. Validates reproducibility of the taxonomy using LLM judges against human labels.", "reason": "Cross-cutting taxonomy studying agent failures across many agent types/worlds, not tied to one activity and proposing no task-performing method.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28825", "title": "Building a Process-Modeling Tool using Agentic AI: An Experience Report on PM4Py-UCM", "authors": ["Daniel Amyot"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28825", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "An experience report mining the development record of PM4Py-UCM, a process-mining tool built largely by an AI coding agent (Claude Code), characterizing human turns, agent corrections, and code-quality outcomes across 18 sessions and 65 hours. Contributes a reproducible taxonomy of human-agent interaction patterns and lessons for responsibly engineering AI-built tools.", "reason": "An empirical case study of human-agent interaction during AI-assisted software construction, proposing no generalizable method, matching the studies leaf.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2507.03156", "title": "The Impact of LLM-Assistants on Software Developer Productivity: A Systematic Review and Mapping Study", "authors": ["Amr Mohamed", "Maram Assi", "Mariam Guizani"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03156", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["survey"], "summary": "Systematic review and mapping of 39 studies examining how LLM-assistants affect software developer productivity across coding, testing, debugging, and documentation tasks. Finds mixed evidence on code quality and highlights gaps in longitudinal and team-based evaluation.", "reason": "Field-wide empirical/survey study whose object is code-agent tool usage and developer productivity, matching the studies leaf.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.00101", "title": "Agentic Coding in the Wild: Characterizing GitHub Copilot Traces at Production Scale", "authors": ["Banruo Liu", "Haoran Qiu", "Íñigo Goiri", "Rodrigo Fonseca", "Ricardo Bianchini", "Esha Choukse"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00101", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "A production-scale empirical characterization of GitHub Copilot agentic coding traces (3.2M users, 761M LLM calls), analyzing session structure, KV-cache behavior, and idle-time patterns to inform agent-native serving infrastructure. It derives a lightweight idle-time predictor from these workload observations.", "reason": "An empirical/behavioral study whose object is the coding-agent workload itself, not a proposed task-performing agent.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.00181", "title": "Cross-Benchmark Generalization in Long-Horizon Agents", "authors": ["Sushant Mehta", "Logan Ritchie", "Liudas Panavas", "Edwin Chen"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00181", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "Post-trains a mixture-of-experts model on long-horizon MCP tool-use tasks via SFT+RL and measures transfer to held-out benchmarks (Toolathlon, tau2-Bench, BFCL-V4, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2), finding consistent gains. A paired-trajectory analysis identifies recurring behavioral changes (goal formation, state tracking, verification) that generalize across domains.", "reason": "Object of study is cross-benchmark behavioral generalization of trained agents, an empirical study spanning both artifact and agency benchmarks rather than one task.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.00355", "title": "CurveShift: Is Agent Progress Scalar? Separating Level from Shape", "authors": ["Hanwen Xing", "Pengyun Wang", "BingXu Meng", "Kumail Alhamoud", "Xiang Li", "Jicheng Wang", "Xin Yu", "Xinyang Han", "Xiaomin Li", "Philip Torr", "Yuexing Hao"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00355", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical", "benchmark"], "summary": "An empirical analysis disentangling whether LLM/agent capability gains reflect genuine shifts in the difficulty-response curve versus ceiling effects, using LiveCodeBench to isolate a real hard-problem effect since September 2024. Releases a new LiveCodeBench Difficulty Panel and analysis code.", "reason": "The paper's object of study is measuring and explaining agent/model capability trends, not proposing a task-performing agent, matching the empirical studies leaf.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.00966", "title": "AgenTag: Attribution of AI Coding Agents from Behavioral Fingerprints", "authors": ["Taher A. Ghaleb"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-02", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00966", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "AgenTag is a multimodal classifier that attributes pull requests to specific AI coding agents using textual, behavioral, and code-diff signals, evaluated on thousands of real PRs. It finds that agents are distinguished mainly by communication style rather than code content, even after removing self-disclosed markers.", "reason": "Empirically studies behavioral fingerprints of coding agents in the wild rather than proposing an agent that writes or executes code.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.01347", "title": "Prompt-Induced Waste in Large Reasoning Models: A Preregistered Two-Harness Benchmark of Coding Agents", "authors": ["Sarel Weinberger", "Amir Hozez"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-02", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01347", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "A preregistered benchmark measuring how prompt wording and agent harness choice affect reasoning-token cost of coding agents across six LRMs and 24 deterministic coding tasks. Finds certain prompts multiply reasoning cost without improving correctness, and harness design causes large cost variance.", "reason": "An empirical/behavioral study of coding-agent cost and prompting practices, not a method proposing a task-performing agent.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.01604", "title": "Post-Training on Office Work Improves Software Engineering: A Behavioral Account of Cross-Domain Transfer", "authors": ["Logan Ritchie", "Sushant Mehta", "Liudas Panavas", "Edwin Chen"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01604", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "This paper post-trains an agent on long-horizon office-workflow tasks (no software engineering data) and finds unexpected improvement on SWE-Bench Pro, then behaviorally analyzes the transfer via goal-directed execution behaviors. It offers a behavioral account of cross-domain generalization rather than a new task-specific tool.", "reason": "The paper's object is empirical behavioral analysis of agent transfer across domains, not a proposed task-specific agent or resource, fitting the empirical-study branch.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.01995", "title": "Long-Horizon Autonomous Architecture Research with a Language-Model Agent: A Behavioural Case Study", "authors": ["Aon Safdar", "Mohamed Saadeldin"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01995", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "A behavioral case study tracking a single LLM agent autonomously conducting long-horizon neural architecture research over ~100 experiments. It reports productivity phase patterns, saturation and recovery dynamics, and how workflow design shaped the agent's research behavior.", "reason": "Object of study is the agent's behavior/process during research, not a proposed method to perform the task, matching the studies/empirical precedent.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.02582", "title": "ACEM: A Cost Estimation Model for Agentic Software Engineering", "authors": ["Mohammad El-Ramly"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02582", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "studies", "tags": ["position"], "summary": "ACEM proposes a cost estimation framework for agentic software engineering that decomposes development cost into LLM, human-in-the-loop, and infrastructure dimensions, mapping traditional sizing metrics to token consumption estimates.", "reason": "A position/framework paper whose object is the economics and practice of agentic software engineering, not a task-performing agent, so it fits studies.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28815", "title": "Preventing Premature Commitment in Coding Agents with an Evidence-Conditioned Execution Layer", "authors": ["Yisen Xu", "Chenglin Li", "Zehao Wang", "Jinqiu Yang", "Tse-Hsun Chen"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28815", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "ECLoop is an execution layer that enforces evidence-conditioned execution, postponing code edits or patch submissions by coding agents until repository evidence conditions are met. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it raises Pass@1 by 4.8-11.8 points while lowering token consumption.", "reason": "Improves issue-resolution/patch-submission behavior on SWE-bench, so routes to debugging.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28871", "title": "Validation Evidence in LLM Repair Agents: How Much of What Passes Actually Tests the Bug?", "authors": ["Xiaonan Xu", "Wenjing Wu"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28871", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": ["empirical"], "summary": "BSG-VA replays repair-agent test validations against buggy, candidate, and gold-fix code states to measure how often a passing test actually discriminates the reported bug, finding nearly half of positive evidence in LLM repair trajectories is uninformative. A feedback intervention returning buggy-state replay results modestly reduces evidence-inadequate patch closures.", "reason": "Centered on diagnosing and improving evidence quality within program-repair agent pipelines, a single activity (software_debugging).", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28887", "title": "To Add Is Machine, To Delete Is Human: Measuring and Mitigating Deletion Avoidance in LLM Code Editing", "authors": ["Amir M. Ebrahimi", "Mohammed Mehedi Hasan", "Aaditya Bhatia", "Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur", "Ahmed E. Hassan"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-30", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28887", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": ["empirical", "benchmark"], "summary": "An empirical study of 'deletion avoidance' in LLM code editing, showing frontier models on SWE-bench Verified frequently fail to delete required code, often wrapping it in guards instead. Introduces CanItDelete, a benchmark of pure-deletion repair tasks, and shows post-training can mitigate the behavior.", "reason": "Measures and benchmarks a failure mode in SWE-bench-style issue-resolution patches, so it routes to software_debugging plus benchmark tag.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.29658", "title": "Reusing Past Repairs Through Hierarchical Trajectory Abstraction for Coding Agents", "authors": ["Yisen Xu", "Jiayuan Zhou", "Ruiqi Pan", "Tse-Hsun Chen"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29658", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "STAIR converts historical repair trajectories into hierarchical, reusable multi-level plans that guide coding agents on new issues, improving Pass@1 on SWE-bench Verified across multiple agent backbones including a structurally different agent without code changes.", "reason": "Directly serves SWE-bench-style repository issue resolution via reusable repair strategies.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2603.29122", "title": "ReLog: Execution-Aware Logging with Runtime Feedback for LLM-Oriented Debugging", "authors": ["Xin Wang", "Yang Feng", "Xiaoqian Jiao", "Yang Zhang", "Zhenhao Li", "Zishuo Ding"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-02", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29122", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "ReLog is an LLM-driven framework that iteratively generates, executes, evaluates, and refines logging statements using runtime feedback, evaluated on defect localization and repair via Defects4J.", "reason": "An agentic code-generation/execution loop serving debugging (fault localization and repair), matching software_debuggings dynamic-analysis debugging-assistant scope.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.00808", "title": "Turning Interaction History into Execution State: A Runtime Layer for Long-Horizon Coding Agents", "authors": ["Zehao Wang", "Yisen Xu", "Chenglin Li", "Chao Peng", "Bram Adams", "Ahmed E. Hassan", "Tse-Hsun", "Chen"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-01", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00808", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "Ledger is a deterministic runtime layer that tracks execution state (observed, modified, attempted) for long-horizon coding agents, preventing redundant or stale actions during repository work. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it improves Pass@1 while cutting cost across multiple LLM-based coding agents.", "reason": "Evaluated on SWE-bench issue-resolution tasks, so it serves software_debugging per benchmark routing.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2602.06090", "title": "SVRepair: Structured Visual Reasoning for Automated Program Repair", "authors": ["Jincheng Wang", "Liwei Luo", "Xiaoxuan Tang", "Jingxuan Xu", "Sheng Zhou", "Dajun Chen", "Wei Jiang", "Yong Li"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.06090", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "SVRepair is a multimodal automated program repair framework that converts visual bug artifacts (screenshots, control-flow graphs) into structured scene graphs to guide a coding agent's fault localization and patch synthesis. It is evaluated on SWE-Bench M and OmniGIRL, improving repair rates over unimodal baselines.", "reason": "An agent that localizes faults and synthesizes patches for reported bugs is issue resolution/APR.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.01918", "title": "HarnessCompass: Guiding Automatic Harness Evolution toward Generalizable and Effective Agent Harnesses", "authors": ["Luan Zhang", "Ruochen Zhou", "Dandan Song", "Zhengyu Chen", "Yuhang Tian", "Jun Yang", "Huipeng Ma", "Chenhao Li", "Guangyuan Feng", "Xudong Li", "Yizhou Jin", "Yan Xu"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01918", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": [], "summary": "HarnessCompass automatically evolves LLM agent harnesses using constrained, component-wise optimization guided by proactive agent feedback, improving generalization over prior harness-evolution methods. Evaluated on SWE-bench Verified, it raises GPT-5.4 Pass@1 from 54% to 66% in five iterations.", "reason": "Improves a coding agent's scaffolding and is evaluated on SWE-bench issue resolution, routing to that activity per benchmark-routing rule.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2608.02499", "title": "SWE-Touch: Benchmarking Coding Agents When Users Touch the Code", "authors": ["Yuqiao Tan", "Jinxiang Meng", "Fangyu Lei", "Minzheng Wang", "Shizhu He", "Jun Zhao", "Kang Liu"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/08", "category": "", "published": "2026-08-03", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02499", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_debugging", "tags": ["benchmark"], "summary": "SWE-Touch is a benchmark that stress-tests coding agents on SWE-bench-style issue resolution when users concurrently edit task-relevant code, via injected 'Counter-Edits.' It shows current agents lack sufficient workspace awareness, degrading resolve rates on shared-workspace repair tasks.", "reason": "Evaluates issue-resolution coding agents on repository repair tasks (SWE-bench Verified/Pro), matching software_debugging.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.28645", "title": "Looks Right, Works Right: A Project-Level Benchmark for Multi-Screen Mobile App Generation", "authors": ["Fan Wu", "Cuiyun Gao", "Yiming Huang", "Yang Xiao", "Yujia Chen", "Qing Liao"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/05", "category": "", "published": "2026-05-29", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28645", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_code_generation", "tags": ["benchmark"], "summary": "MobileForge is a project-level benchmark for generating complete multi-screen mobile apps from designs, testing buildability, cross-page navigation, visual fidelity, and maintainability. It evaluates six frontier multimodal LLMs and finds navigation and maintainability still lag behind compilable output.", "reason": "Whole-application generation from a specification is software_code_generation per the repo/whole-app generation-from-scratch boundary.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.29389", "title": "Simulation Code Generation for Fluid Systems using Large Language Models: Benchmarking Models and Prompting Strategies", "authors": ["Jan Marius Stürmer", "Jascha Knack", "Tobias Koch", "Andreas Weinmann"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29389", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_code_generation", "tags": ["benchmark"], "summary": "Benchmarks ten LLMs and six prompting strategies for translating a neutral graph representation of fluid system models into executable simulation code for WNTR and Modelica. Evaluates generated code via software-quality metrics and functional fidelity against benchmark scenarios.", "reason": "Task is producing domain-specific simulation code from a specification, matching software_code_generation.", "source": "crawl"}, {"paper": {"id": "2607.29529", "title": "AuditCoder: Responsibility-Preserving Task Graphs for Auditable Code Generation and Bounded Repair", "authors": ["Kangjie Huang", "Chen Lyu"], "venue": "arXiv 2026/07", "category": "", "published": "2026-07-31", "links": {"paper": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29529", "github": "", "website": ""}}, "category": "software_code_generation", "tags": [], "summary": "AuditCoder generates code alongside an auditable construction trace using contract-annotated task graphs that assign stable responsibility identities, enabling bounded repair localized to failing regions. Evaluated on APPS and ClassEval, it achieves competitive pass@1 while providing high decision-code trace coverage.", "reason": "The served task is producing code from specifications on APPS/ClassEval benchmarks, matching software_code_generation.", "source": "crawl"}]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    paper-reviewPapers awaiting the owner's review

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions