Skip to content

Conversation

@DropSnorz
Copy link
Owner

@DropSnorz DropSnorz commented May 16, 2025

Related to #316

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 16, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The run method in CommandRunner was refactored to use asynchronous output reading via a new StreamReader inner class and an ExecutorService. Timeout handling was updated to use process.waitFor with a timeout, and output retrieval is now managed through a Future. Error handling and resource cleanup were also improved.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
owlplug-host/src/main/java/com/owlplug/host/io/CommandRunner.java Refactored run method for asynchronous process output reading, improved timeout handling, added StreamReader inner class, enhanced error handling and resource cleanup.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant CommandRunner
    participant ExecutorService
    participant StreamReader
    participant Process

    Caller->>CommandRunner: run(command...)
    CommandRunner->>Process: Start process
    CommandRunner->>ExecutorService: submit(StreamReader)
    ExecutorService->>StreamReader: call()
    StreamReader->>Process: Read process output
    alt Timeout enabled
        CommandRunner->>Process: waitFor(timeout)
        alt Process finishes in time
            CommandRunner->>ExecutorService: get output (Future)
        else Timeout exceeded
            CommandRunner->>Process: destroyForcibly
            CommandRunner->>Caller: throw IOException
        end
    else No timeout
        CommandRunner->>Process: waitFor()
        CommandRunner->>ExecutorService: get output (Future)
    end
    CommandRunner->>ExecutorService: shutdown
    CommandRunner->>Caller: return CommandResult
Loading

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@DropSnorz
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 16, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
owlplug-host/src/main/java/com/owlplug/host/io/CommandRunner.java (2)

85-96: Proper output retrieval with resource cleanup.

The implementation correctly:

  • Retrieves output with a timeout for graceful completion
  • Handles exceptions during output retrieval
  • Ensures executor shutdown in a finally block

One suggestion:

- // Let 1 seconds for gracefully read and complete process
+ // Allow 1 second for graceful reading and process completion

115-133: Well-designed StreamReader implementation.

The StreamReader class is a good encapsulation of the input stream reading logic.

Consider adding resource cleanup to prevent potential resource leaks:

  @Override
  public String call() throws Exception {
-   BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream));
-   StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
-   String line;
-   while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
-     output.append(line).append(System.lineSeparator());
-   }
-   return output.toString();
+   try (BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(inputStream))) {
+     StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
+     String line;
+     while ((line = reader.readLine()) != null) {
+       output.append(line).append(System.lineSeparator());
+     }
+     return output.toString();
+   }
  }

This ensures the reader is properly closed even in case of exceptions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89ce8cb and 95fe9e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • owlplug-host/src/main/java/com/owlplug/host/io/CommandRunner.java (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
owlplug-host/src/main/java/com/owlplug/host/io/CommandRunner.java (4)

23-31: Appropriate imports added for concurrency implementation.

The additional imports are necessary for the new asynchronous process handling approach and are correctly defined.


59-63: Good use of ExecutorService for asynchronous output reading.

Using a single-threaded executor to handle potentially blocking I/O operations separately from the main thread is a good approach. This helps prevent the main thread from hanging while reading process output.


64-83: Improved timeout handling with better error management.

The implementation properly uses Java's built-in process API features:

  • Uses process.waitFor(timeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS) when timeout is activated
  • Properly tracks completion with a boolean flag
  • Adds explicit error logging and resource cleanup when interrupted
  • Forcibly destroys the process on timeout with clear error messaging

This should effectively address the scanner hangs and timeouts mentioned in the PR.


55-96: Overall refactoring significantly improves process handling and reliability.

The refactoring of the run method effectively addresses the scanner hangs and timeouts mentioned in the PR by:

  1. Moving from synchronous to asynchronous output reading
  2. Using Java's built-in timeout capabilities instead of manual time tracking
  3. Improving error handling and resource cleanup
  4. Properly handling process termination on timeout

This implementation should be more robust and less prone to hanging or timing out unexpectedly.

@DropSnorz DropSnorz merged commit 13b0188 into dev May 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@DropSnorz DropSnorz deleted the fix/scanner-hang branch September 27, 2025 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants