You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
feat: install codebase-memory skill for Codex #976
Codex currently receives MCP config, .codex/AGENTS.md, and a SessionStart reminder, but it does not receive the consolidated codebase-memory Skill that Claude Code gets. Codex now supports user skills from HOME/.agents/skills, so the installer can reuse the existing embedded codebase-memory skill there.
Proposed change
Install the existing codebase-memory Skill to HOME/.agents/skills/codebase-memory/SKILL.md when Codex is detected.
Preserve .codex/AGENTS.md as lightweight always-loaded guidance.
Include the skill path in install --plan.
Remove only the managed Codex skill on uninstall.
Update tests, smoke/security install checks, and README multi-agent table.
This is separate from #715, which tracks dynamic Codex PreToolUse/PostToolUse graph augmentation.
Thanks. I have linked this with PR #977 and triaged it as a 0.9.2-rc Codex integration enhancement. Review should focus on keeping the Codex skill install clearly managed, preserving existing user configuration, and making uninstall remove only files owned by codebase-memory-mcp.
Thank you again for the focused Codex skill proposal. Following up: #977 is the linked implementation context, and I have no newly verified install/uninstall result to report in this sweep. The managed-file ownership requirement from the earlier reply still frames the request; there is no need to repeat the proposal.
Activity
DeusData commentedon Jul 9, 2026
Thanks. I have linked this with PR #977 and triaged it as a 0.9.2-rc Codex integration enhancement. Review should focus on keeping the Codex skill install clearly managed, preserving existing user configuration, and making uninstall remove only files owned by codebase-memory-mcp.
DeusData commentedon Oct 19, 2026
Thank you again for the focused Codex skill proposal. Following up: #977 is the linked implementation context, and I have no newly verified install/uninstall result to report in this sweep. The managed-file ownership requirement from the earlier reply still frames the request; there is no need to repeat the proposal.