Conversation
|
@Andy-MS looks like the other definitions are more updated, but also not sure if they will work as a replacement for the ones we are removing. Any way to test that? Maybe run the current test suite against the other definitions? |
|
After 5 days, no one has reviewed the PR 😞. A maintainer will be reviewing the PR in the next few days and will either merge it or request revisions. Thank you for your patience! |
paulvanbrenk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See comment by @FanaHOVA
|
@Andy-MS One or more reviewers has requested changes. Please address their comments. I'll be back once they sign off or you've pushed new commits. Thank you! |
|
@Andy-MS please merge and run the depreciation script. |
|
Ran deprecation script. |
|
@Andy-MS yup, so I'm assuming old versions are unsupported now that this is merged? |
|
@FanaHOVA It should still be possible to install the old |
Fixes #12134
chartjsprovides types for the same packages aschart.js, which on NPM is namedchart.js. CC @FanaHOVA @JeroenDragtLooking at the commit history
chart.jsis much more popular thanchartjs, so I'll just assume that its types are more accurate.If this is merged, I will run
npm deprecate @types/chartjs "'@types/chartjs' is now '@types/chart.js'".