docs: Update streaming indicators plan for current status#1976
docs: Update streaming indicators plan for current status#1976DaveSkender merged 2 commits intov3from
Conversation
Co-authored-by: DaveSkender <[email protected]>
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/plans/streaming-indicators.plan.md (1)
1-5:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorAdd required YAML front matter to this docs page.
This Markdown page is under
docs/but has no front matter block (title,description,layout), which can break/skip expected VitePress page metadata behavior.Suggested patch
+--- +title: Streaming indicators implementation plan +description: Execution plan and status for v3 streaming indicators work. +layout: doc +--- + # Streaming Indicators implementation planAs per coding guidelines, "All pages require YAML front matter with title, description, and layout metadata".
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/plans/streaming-indicators.plan.md` around lines 1 - 5, Add a YAML front matter block to the top of the "Streaming Indicators implementation plan" Markdown (the page whose H1 is "Streaming Indicators implementation plan") containing at minimum title, description, and layout keys (e.g., title: "Streaming Indicators implementation plan", a short description summarizing the page, and layout: "docs" or the appropriate site layout) so the page conforms to the docs guidelines and VitePress metadata expectations.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In `@docs/plans/streaming-indicators.plan.md`:
- Around line 1-5: Add a YAML front matter block to the top of the "Streaming
Indicators implementation plan" Markdown (the page whose H1 is "Streaming
Indicators implementation plan") containing at minimum title, description, and
layout keys (e.g., title: "Streaming Indicators implementation plan", a short
description summarizing the page, and layout: "docs" or the appropriate site
layout) so the page conforms to the docs guidelines and VitePress metadata
expectations.
The streaming indicators plan had stale metrics and at least one task (P006) that described optimizing an implementation that doesn't exist.
Metric corrections
80 (95%)→79 (93%)— actual catalog count is 79 Stream entries78/79 (99%)→77/79 (97%)— SmaAnalysis and Tr are streamable but have no doc pagesTask corrections
docs/migration.mdalready has a full streaming capabilities section covering BufferList/StreamHub patterns, migration examples, and performance guidance.New work items
Series=85, Buffer=79, Stream=79, Total=243) so the test can be locked to precise assertions rather thanBeGreaterThan()placeholders.💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.