Skip to content

Release v1.1.0#189

Merged
leoromanovsky merged 12 commits intomainfrom
release/v1.1.0
Mar 2, 2026
Merged

Release v1.1.0#189
leoromanovsky merged 12 commits intomainfrom
release/v1.1.0

Conversation

@leoromanovsky
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Motivation

Prepare minor release v1.1.0 with changes accumulated since v1.0.0 GA.

Changes

  • Bumps all packages (@datadog/flagging-core, @datadog/openfeature-browser, @datadog/openfeature-node-server) from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0
  • Updates CHANGELOG.md with all changes since v1.0.0
  • Updates peer dependency versions across packages

Notable changes in this release:

Decisions

  • Using latest npm tag (production release, not prerelease)
  • After this PR is merged, create a GitHub Release with tag v1.1.0 (non-prerelease) to trigger automated publishing

@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2026 17:49
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky requested a review from a team as a code owner March 2, 2026 17:49
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# openfeature-js-client

Monorepo using **Lerna** with **fixed versioning** — all packages share the version in `lerna.json`.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like it locks us into having the same version for browser and node packages, and always releasing the two simultaneously. This doesn't seem desirable given how little overlap there is.

Although this looks like it isn't new, now might be a good time to revisit this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea thanks for bringing it up; right it's the existing procedure but I agree it feels undesirable given they are totally different targets.

If we continue like this, almost all server releases will be empty. It is up to dd-trace-js to pick them up as needed. Do you think this makes upgrade dd-trace-js harder?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dd-oleksii dd-oleksii Mar 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess my main worry is having more major version bumps than necessary. For all the reason, including users not getting automated updates and having to bump dependency version on their end

…r description

- Move IndexedDB persistence and RUM tracking items to Public Changes section
- Fix node-server package.json description from "React Native" to "Node.js server"
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky requested a review from dd-oleksii March 2, 2026 18:11
Co-authored-by: Oleksii Shmalko <[email protected]>
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky merged commit dd847ed into main Mar 2, 2026
4 checks passed
@leoromanovsky leoromanovsky deleted the release/v1.1.0 branch March 2, 2026 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants