Skip to content

Revert "Bump psutil version to 5.9.7 (#16547)" (#17112)#17118

Merged
FlorentClarret merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
florentclarret/port_revert
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Revert "Bump psutil version to 5.9.7 (#16547)" (#17112)#17118
FlorentClarret merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
florentclarret/port_revert

Conversation

@FlorentClarret

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret commented Mar 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This reverts commit fde8722

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Port #17112 to master

Additional Notes

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Changelog entries must be created for modifications to shipped code
  • Add the qa/skip-qa label if the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.06%. Comparing base (d9df21e) to head (63a957a).

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
activemq ?
btrfs 82.91% <ø> (ø)
cassandra ?
disk 91.47% <ø> (+2.13%) ⬆️
gunicorn 92.10% <ø> (ø)
hive ?
hivemq ?
hudi ?
ibm_mq 91.28% <ø> (ø)
ignite ?
jboss_wildfly ?
kafka ?
network 93.65% <ø> (+1.08%) ⬆️
presto ?
process 85.28% <ø> (+0.28%) ⬆️
solr ?
system_core 92.66% <ø> (ø)
system_swap 98.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

 32 files   32 suites   3m 28s ⏱️
235 tests 235 ✅   0 💤 0 ❌
881 runs  760 ✅ 121 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 63a957a.

@FlorentClarret
FlorentClarret merged commit 6f41dd3 into master Mar 8, 2024
@FlorentClarret
FlorentClarret deleted the florentclarret/port_revert branch March 8, 2024 14:58
marlon-merida pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
@thibaultkrebs thibaultkrebs mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2024
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants