Skip to content

Revert "Bump pydantic version in the agent_requirements.in file (#153…#15338

Merged
vivek-datadog merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
vivek-datadog/revert-15320
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

Revert "Bump pydantic version in the agent_requirements.in file (#153…#15338
vivek-datadog merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
vivek-datadog/revert-15320

Conversation

@vivek-datadog

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

…20)"

This reverts commit acdf389.

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • PR title must be written as a CHANGELOG entry (see why)
  • Files changes must correspond to the primary purpose of the PR as described in the title (small unrelated changes should have their own PR)
  • PR must have changelog/ and integration/ labels attached
  • If the PR doesn't need to be tested during QA, please add a qa/skip-qa label.

@vivek-datadog
vivek-datadog marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2023 07:50
@vivek-datadog
vivek-datadog requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2023 07:50
@vivek-datadog
vivek-datadog merged commit 8e72bf3 into master Jul 24, 2023
@vivek-datadog
vivek-datadog deleted the vivek-datadog/revert-15320 branch July 24, 2023 08:01
FlorentClarret added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2023
FlorentClarret added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2023
* Revert "Revert "Bump pydantic version in the agent_requirements.in file (#15320)" (#15338)"

This reverts commit 8e72bf3.

* upgrade pydantic

* downgrade pydantic

* downgrade again

---------

Co-authored-by: Florent Clarret <[email protected]>
@vivek-datadog vivek-datadog added the qa/skip-qa Automatically skip this PR for the next QA label Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

base_package dependencies qa/skip-qa Automatically skip this PR for the next QA

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants