Skip to content

[CONTP-1587] Deprecate other controllers in favour of DDGR and add DDGR#37588

Merged
tbavelier merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
tbavelier/contp-1587-ddgr-docs
Jun 25, 2026
Merged

[CONTP-1587] Deprecate other controllers in favour of DDGR and add DDGR#37588
tbavelier merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
tbavelier/contp-1587-ddgr-docs

Conversation

@tbavelier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Same as DataDog/datadog-operator#3152 but in documentation: we want users to use DDGR instead of individual older controllers

Merge readiness

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

  • ⚠️ Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). If you've already created your PR with an incorrect branch name, please rename your branch and open a fresh PR.
  • 🤖 New: Comment with /review to run an automated check that catches common issues before a Documentation team member reviews your PR.

AI assistance

Used codex as the first pass:

  • This notably generated the config modifications: not sure if they should be included

Additional notes

@tbavelier
tbavelier marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2026 12:58
@tbavelier
tbavelier requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2026 12:58
@buraizu buraizu self-assigned this Jun 17, 2026
@buraizu

buraizu commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the PR! Created DOCS-14881 for documentation team review

@buraizu buraizu added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Jun 17, 2026
@buraizu buraizu removed their assignment Jun 17, 2026
@tbavelier
tbavelier merged commit 997675a into master Jun 25, 2026
19 checks passed
@tbavelier
tbavelier deleted the tbavelier/contp-1587-ddgr-docs branch June 25, 2026 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants