fix(jest): report tests from custom environments by juan-fernandez · Pull Request #9194 · DataDog/dd-trace-js

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T16:03:57Z

What does this PR do?

Ensures dd-trace still reports Jest test events when a project uses a custom Jest environment that overrides handleTestEvent without calling super.handleTestEvent.

The Jest environment wrapper now detects custom handleTestEvent overrides and runs Datadog's event handler after the custom handler when the event has not already been handled.

Motivation

While validating Test Optimization against webpack/webpack, the runbook reported session, module, and suite events, but zero test events. The project uses a custom Jest environment, and that environment shadows Datadog's Jest circus handleTestEvent hook. As a result, per-test events never reached the intake even though the broader Jest lifecycle was instrumented.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-07-02T16:04:56Z

Overall package size

Self size: 6.53 MB
Deduped: 7.59 MB
No deduping: 7.59 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.2.0 | 104.26 kB | 843.44 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T16:05:09Z

@codex review

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T16:05:16Z

/datadog autotest review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8038fc8927

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 · 2026-07-02T16:14:34Z

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 78.95%
• Overall Coverage: 87.86% (-0.00%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: c96ddba | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

pr-commenter · 2026-07-02T16:15:59Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-03 06:31:00

Comparing candidate commit c96ddba in PR branch juan-fernandez/fix-jest-custom-environment-events with baseline commit f3c7006 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2251 metrics, 35 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

unstable execution_time [-178.813ms; +184.974ms] or [-6.786%; +7.020%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

unstable execution_time [-199.249ms; +202.023ms] or [-7.934%; +8.045%]

scenario:appsec-control-20

unstable execution_time [-134.055ms; +168.860ms] or [-7.745%; +9.756%]

scenario:appsec-control-24

unstable execution_time [-105066.290µs; +105837.057µs] or [-8.629%; +8.692%]

scenario:appsec-control-26

unstable execution_time [-111532.526µs; +112652.431µs] or [-9.253%; +9.346%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-2384.204ms; +2056.801ms] or [-26.193%; +22.597%]
unstable execution_time [-2466.144ms; +2172.153ms] or [-25.121%; +22.126%]
unstable instructions [-20.1G instructions; +17.6G instructions] or [-26.946%; +23.552%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-10308.394KB; +9393.194KB] or [-6.487%; +5.911%]
unstable throughput [-575.537op/s; +702.261op/s] or [-17.090%; +20.853%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-1838.237ms; +595.784ms] or [-19.689%; +6.381%]
unstable execution_time [-1846.930ms; +608.234ms] or [-18.395%; +6.058%]
unstable instructions [-16.4G instructions; +5.4G instructions] or [-21.200%; +6.964%]
unstable throughput [-139.368op/s; +409.323op/s] or [-4.258%; +12.506%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-1466.211ms; +503.054ms] or [-17.009%; +5.836%]
unstable execution_time [-1491.067ms; +498.372ms] or [-16.033%; +5.359%]
unstable instructions [-12.4G instructions; +4.0G instructions] or [-17.658%; +5.704%]
unstable throughput [-164.343op/s; +447.144op/s] or [-4.683%; +12.740%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-1930.675ms; +567.420ms] or [-20.716%; +6.088%]
unstable execution_time [-1952.511ms; +579.747ms] or [-19.512%; +5.793%]
unstable instructions [-17.3G instructions; +4.9G instructions] or [-22.333%; +6.324%]
unstable throughput [-121.965op/s; +438.004op/s] or [-3.709%; +13.320%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-1674.212ms; +600.902ms] or [-21.012%; +7.542%]
unstable execution_time [-1686.234ms; +642.142ms] or [-19.476%; +7.417%]
unstable instructions [-14.5G instructions; +5.1G instructions] or [-22.295%; +7.866%]
unstable throughput [-204.067op/s; +473.589op/s] or [-5.344%; +12.403%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-1815.417ms; +668.339ms] or [-19.415%; +7.147%]
unstable execution_time [-1863.783ms; +697.995ms] or [-18.562%; +6.951%]
unstable instructions [-16.0G instructions; +5.6G instructions] or [-20.640%; +7.248%]
unstable throughput [-165.318op/s; +393.598op/s] or [-5.044%; +12.009%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

unstable cpu_user_time [-486.369ms; +171.583ms] or [-9.967%; +3.516%]
unstable execution_time [-487.659ms; +169.010ms] or [-9.839%; +3.410%]
unstable throughput [-57738.138op/s; +167195.033op/s] or [-3.410%; +9.875%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-35.218MB; +48.414MB] or [-8.994%; +12.364%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-4355.296KB; +3968.296KB] or [-5.554%; +5.061%]

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

More details

The wrapper logic in wrapCustomHandleTestEvent is correct across all adversarial scenarios: normal environments (no wrapper installed), custom envs without super (DD fires after custom), custom envs with super (DD fires exactly once via dedup), sync/async mismatches (returns thenable preserving custom return value), sync throws and async rejections (propagate cleanly without triggering DD), and multi-level inheritance (DD always fires after the outermost override). The module-scope handledJestEvents WeakSet is safe because Jest creates fresh event objects per dispatch and workers are isolated processes.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{📊 Validated against 12 scenarios · Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 8038fc8 · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

codecov · 2026-07-02T16:19:10Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.73684% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.64%. Comparing base (f3c7006) to head (c96ddba).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/jest.js	94.73%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9194   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.64%   93.64%           
=======================================
  Files         898      898           
  Lines       52365    52421   +56     
  Branches    12324    12340   +16     
=======================================
+ Hits        49037    49091   +54     
- Misses       3328     3330    +2

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	`34.88% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
aiguard-integration	`41.96% <ø> (ø)`
apm-bucket-0	`34.84% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-1	`40.51% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-2	`37.50% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-capabilities-tracing	`48.89% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-aerospike	`33.13% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	`40.03% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-couchbase	`33.41% <ø> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-http	`42.05% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-kafkajs	`40.27% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-next	`29.59% <ø> (-0.11%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-prisma	`35.18% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-tedious	`34.05% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
appsec	`57.83% <ø> (-0.15%)`	⬇️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	`53.83% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
appsec-integration	`35.63% <5.26%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	`43.76% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	`48.91% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-next	`28.04% <5.26%> (-0.15%)`	⬇️
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	`48.08% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	`45.64% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
debugger	`44.64% <ø> (ø)`
instrumentations-bucket-0	`28.17% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-1	`37.57% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-10	`40.52% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-11	`27.96% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-12	`28.79% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-13	`27.79% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-2	`30.36% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-3	`36.06% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-4	`28.58% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-5	`36.42% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-6	`38.43% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-7	`36.16% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-8	`37.11% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-9	`39.62% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	`46.48% <ø> (ø)`
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	`24.47% <5.26%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	`39.68% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
llmobs-google-genai_langchain_vertex-ai	`37.10% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
llmobs-openai	`39.74% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
llmobs-sdk	`43.59% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
master-coverage	`93.64% <94.73%> (?)`
openfeature	`37.94% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
openfeature-unit	`50.47% <ø> (ø)`
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	`22.93% <5.26%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
platform-integration	`47.59% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	`18.44% <5.26%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-0	`36.52% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-1	`39.78% <ø> (ø)`
plugins-bucket-11	`38.63% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-17	`39.22% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-18	`42.18% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-19	`39.97% <ø> (+0.17%)`	⬆️
plugins-bucket-20	`43.38% <ø> (-0.13%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-4	`37.88% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bullmq_cassandra_cookie	`39.93% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-cookie-parser_crypto_dd-trace-api	`33.23% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-fetch_fs_generic-pool	`36.21% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-google-cloud-pubsub_grpc_handlebars	`43.09% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-hapi_hono_ioredis	`37.95% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-jest_knex_langgraph	`32.61% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client	`27.92% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached	`35.18% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-mongodb_mongodb-core_mongoose	`36.46% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-multer_mysql_mysql2	`35.15% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-nats_node-serialize_opensearch	`37.31% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-passport-http_pino_postgres	`35.53% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-process_pug_redis	`34.27% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-undici_url_valkey	`36.03% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-vm_winston_ws	`37.72% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
profiling	`43.81% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	`33.32% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	`32.19% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-client	`37.16% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	`34.19% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	`27.36% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	`37.55% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	`34.64% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	`32.63% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	`39.65% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	`38.52% <ø> (+0.05%)`	⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	`38.14% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	`33.22% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-util	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-bucket-0	`39.64% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-lambda	`34.34% <ø> (-0.09%)`	⬇️
test-optimization-cucumber	`52.54% <ø> (+0.11%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-cypress	`49.63% <ø> (+0.06%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-jest	`55.73% <94.73%> (+0.19%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-mocha	`53.61% <ø> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	`43.53% <ø> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	`43.81% <ø> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	`43.94% <ø> (+0.11%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	`43.36% <ø> (ø)`
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	`43.47% <ø> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	`45.15% <ø> (+0.30%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	`44.71% <ø> (+0.06%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-selenium	`45.49% <63.15%> (+0.11%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-testopt	`46.86% <63.15%> (+0.12%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-vitest	`52.71% <ø> (+0.09%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T21:39:57Z

@codex review

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T21:40:07Z

/datadog autotest review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-02T21:44:39Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please!

Reviewed commit: c6a2b5cf16

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c6a2b5cf16

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

More details

The wrapper correctly handles all three custom-environment patterns (prototype override without super, instance field, async add_test) — 9 adversarial scenarios executed locally all pass. The WeakSet deduplication prevents double-firing when a custom env does call super, and the setup() re-check correctly defers instance-field wrapping until after the subclass constructor completes.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{📊 Validated against 9 scenarios · Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit c6a2b5c · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-03T06:07:18Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3c616effad

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-03T06:22:42Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-03T06:27:33Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: c96ddba079

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

fix(jest): report tests from custom environments

8038fc8

github-actions Bot added the semver-patch label Jul 2, 2026

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/jest.js Outdated

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/jest.js

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

fix(jest): preserve custom environment event hooks

c6a2b5c

juan-fernandez marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2026 21:46

juan-fernandez requested a review from a team as a code owner July 2, 2026 21:46

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/jest.js

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

fix(jest): wrap late custom environment event handlers

3c616ef

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/jest.js

fix(jest): rewrap custom handlers from adapter

c96ddba

daniel-mohedano approved these changes Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

juan-fernandez merged commit 0e90a6d into master Jul 3, 2026
688 of 690 checks passed

juan-fernandez deleted the juan-fernandez/fix-jest-custom-environment-events branch July 3, 2026 09:11

dd-octo-sts Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2026

fix(jest): report tests from custom environments (#9194)

9cf011b

dd-octo-sts Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2026

v6.0.1 proposal #9207

Closed

dd-octo-sts Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2026

fix(jest): report tests from custom environments (#9194)

1835ebe

This was referenced Jul 6, 2026

v5.111.1 proposal #9208

Closed

v6.1.0 proposal #9220

Merged

v5.112.0 proposal #9221

Merged

juan-fernandez added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026

fix(jest): report tests from custom environments (#9194)

02ecb64

juan-fernandez added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026

fix(jest): report tests from custom environments (#9194)

e563b37

davidxia mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2026

[BUG]: dd-trace 6.1.0 intermittently breaks Vitest tests under @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers with ByteString header error #9259

Closed

Uh oh!

Conversation

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Overall package size

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Unstable benchmarks

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

scenario:appsec-control-20

scenario:appsec-control-24

scenario:appsec-control-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited by datadog-datadog-prod-us1 Bot

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading