fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags by juan-fernandez · Pull Request #9189 · DataDog/dd-trace-js

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T14:37:22Z

What does this PR do?

Propagates Test Optimization request error tags through Vitest no-worker-init reporting.

Specifically, this returns the current request error tags from settings, known-tests, and test-management requests, stores them in Vitest main no-worker state, and forwards them to no-worker session, suite, and test events, including skipped tests.

Motivation

When a Test Optimization request fails, normal worker instrumentation tags emitted events with the request error. No-worker-init reporting should keep that diagnostic signal on the same event types even when worker instrumentation is skipped.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-07-02T14:38:24Z

Overall package size

Self size: 6.52 MB
Deduped: 7.59 MB
No deduping: 7.59 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.2.0 | 104.26 kB | 843.44 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T14:42:46Z

@codex review

pr-commenter · 2026-07-02T14:47:31Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-02 15:06:38

Comparing candidate commit baec21e in PR branch juan-fernandez/vitest-no-worker-request-error-tags with baseline commit 9e5845e in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2247 metrics, 39 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

unstable execution_time [-174.945ms; +178.470ms] or [-6.654%; +6.788%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

unstable execution_time [-195.679ms; +208.990ms] or [-7.804%; +8.335%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

unstable execution_time [-148282.416µs; +150140.016µs] or [-5.150%; +5.214%]

scenario:appsec-control-20

unstable execution_time [-169.045ms; +158.976ms] or [-9.641%; +9.066%]

scenario:appsec-control-24

unstable execution_time [-101366.573µs; +99509.273µs] or [-8.388%; +8.234%]

scenario:appsec-control-26

unstable execution_time [-111.037ms; +113.891ms] or [-9.189%; +9.425%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2862.944ms; +4149.117ms] or [-27.194%; +39.411%]
unstable execution_time [-2874.162ms; +4156.935ms] or [-25.562%; +36.971%]
unstable instructions [-25.6G instructions; +37.3G instructions] or [-28.984%; +42.206%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-8.829MB; +12.357MB] or [-5.418%; +7.583%]
unstable throughput [-922.022op/s; +630.330op/s] or [-30.568%; +20.897%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-3432.977ms; +2221.270ms] or [-37.894%; +24.519%]
unstable execution_time [-3455.756ms; +2252.985ms] or [-35.445%; +23.108%]
unstable instructions [-28.8G instructions; +18.8G instructions] or [-38.794%; +25.362%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-11.709MB; +7.737MB] or [-7.202%; +4.759%]
unstable throughput [-659.657op/s; +1014.518op/s] or [-18.800%; +28.914%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2945773.475µs; +2944212.275µs] or [-29.651%; +29.636%]
unstable execution_time [-2937.857ms; +2971.025ms] or [-27.671%; +27.984%]
unstable instructions [-26072.4M instructions; +26091.4M instructions] or [-31.371%; +31.393%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-8504.150KB; +9720.950KB] or [-5.276%; +6.031%]
unstable throughput [-657.419op/s; +644.729op/s] or [-20.843%; +20.440%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-1893.562ms; +2984.233ms] or [-23.952%; +37.748%]
unstable execution_time [-1901.119ms; +2999.126ms] or [-22.135%; +34.920%]
unstable instructions [-15.8G instructions; +25.2G instructions] or [-24.653%; +39.185%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-6.729MB; +11.386MB] or [-4.247%; +7.187%]
unstable throughput [-887.742op/s; +564.988op/s] or [-23.111%; +14.709%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2039.187ms; +3248.514ms] or [-21.773%; +34.685%]
unstable execution_time [-2071.676ms; +3285.845ms] or [-20.566%; +32.620%]
unstable instructions [-18.5G instructions; +29.4G instructions] or [-23.696%; +37.696%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-8.555MB; +11.009MB] or [-5.428%; +6.985%]
unstable throughput [-717.208op/s; +454.059op/s] or [-22.018%; +13.940%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

unstable cpu_user_time [-196.486ms; +445.127ms] or [-3.927%; +8.897%]
unstable execution_time [-199.316ms; +445.513ms] or [-3.927%; +8.778%]
unstable throughput [-153856.091op/s; +67289.529op/s] or [-9.299%; +4.067%]

scenario:log-with-debug-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-8.144MB; +4.923MB] or [-7.120%; +4.304%]

scenario:plugin-couchbase-upsert-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-197.725ms; +373.477ms] or [-4.330%; +8.179%]
unstable execution_time [-198.478ms; +374.179ms] or [-4.340%; +8.183%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-27.470MB; +19.012MB] or [-7.228%; +5.003%]

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-off-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-7671.255KB; +7599.827KB] or [-5.910%; +5.855%]

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 556ed47b6f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

codecov · 2026-07-02T14:52:25Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.23529% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (9e5845e) to head (baec21e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ckages/datadog-instrumentations/src/vitest-main.js	80.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9189      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.63%   93.65%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         896      898       +2     
  Lines       52220    52371     +151     
  Branches    12265    12322      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits        48895    49046     +151     
  Misses       3325     3325

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	`34.98% <0.00%> (+0.04%)`	⬆️
aiguard-integration	`41.96% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
apm-bucket-0	`34.85% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-1	`40.52% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-2	`37.51% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-capabilities-tracing	`48.87% <0.00%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-aerospike	`33.13% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	`40.03% <0.00%> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-couchbase	`33.42% <0.00%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-http	`42.06% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-kafkajs	`40.27% <0.00%> (-0.10%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-next	`29.63% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-prisma	`35.19% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-tedious	`34.05% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec	`57.94% <0.00%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	`53.85% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-integration	`35.68% <5.88%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	`43.76% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	`48.92% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
appsec-next	`28.12% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	`48.14% <0.00%> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	`45.64% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
debugger	`44.63% <0.00%> (+0.29%)`	⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-0	`28.17% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-1	`37.58% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-10	`40.52% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-11	`27.97% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-12	`28.80% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-13	`27.80% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-2	`30.37% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-3	`36.07% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-4	`28.58% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-5	`36.43% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-6	`38.43% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-7	`36.17% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-8	`37.12% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-9	`39.62% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	`46.48% <ø> (ø)`
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	`24.50% <5.88%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	`39.69% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
llmobs-google-genai_langchain_vertex-ai	`37.11% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
llmobs-openai	`39.75% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
llmobs-sdk	`43.60% <0.00%> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
master-coverage	`93.65% <88.23%> (?)`
openfeature	`37.94% <0.00%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
openfeature-unit	`50.47% <ø> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	`22.96% <5.88%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
platform-integration	`47.58% <0.00%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	`18.48% <10.00%> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-0	`36.53% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-1	`39.78% <0.00%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
plugins-bucket-11	`38.64% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-17	`39.33% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-18	`42.19% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-19	`39.74% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-20	`43.45% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-4	`37.88% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-bullmq_cassandra_cookie	`39.94% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-cookie-parser_crypto_dd-trace-api	`33.23% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-fetch_fs_generic-pool	`36.22% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-google-cloud-pubsub_grpc_handlebars	`43.10% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-hapi_hono_ioredis	`37.95% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-jest_knex_langgraph	`32.62% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client	`27.93% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached	`35.18% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-mongodb_mongodb-core_mongoose	`36.47% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-multer_mysql_mysql2	`35.16% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-nats_node-serialize_opensearch	`37.32% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-passport-http_pino_postgres	`35.54% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-process_pug_redis	`34.27% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-undici_url_valkey	`36.04% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-vm_winston_ws	`37.73% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
profiling	`43.81% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	`33.43% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	`32.29% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-client	`37.16% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	`34.29% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	`27.36% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	`37.56% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	`34.74% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	`32.73% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	`39.67% <0.00%> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	`38.42% <0.00%> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	`38.16% <0.00%> (-0.22%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	`33.32% <0.00%> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-util	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-bucket-0	`39.63% <0.00%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
serverless-lambda	`34.35% <0.00%> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
test-optimization-cucumber	`52.55% <85.71%> (+0.12%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-cypress	`49.63% <0.00%> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-jest	`55.58% <100.00%> (+0.14%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-mocha	`53.62% <85.71%> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	`43.53% <71.42%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	`43.82% <71.42%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	`43.92% <85.71%> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	`43.36% <71.42%> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	`43.47% <85.71%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	`44.94% <85.71%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	`44.72% <71.42%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-selenium	`45.44% <57.14%> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-testopt	`46.81% <35.29%> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-vitest	`52.74% <88.23%> (+0.13%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

datadog-prod-us1-4 · 2026-07-02T14:53:30Z

Tests

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 88.24%
• Overall Coverage: 87.87% (+0.01%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: baec21e | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T15:06:11Z

@codex review

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-02T15:06:20Z

/datadog autotest review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-02T15:10:15Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: baec21e753

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

datadog-prod-us1-4

More details

PR correctly propagates Test Optimization request error tags to no-worker-init reporting. The implementation extracts tags from all request types (settings, known tests, test management), accumulates them in a module-level variable, and applies them to session, suite, and test events. No behavioral regressions detected.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit baec21e · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags

556ed47

github-actions Bot added the semver-patch label Jul 2, 2026

juan-fernandez added the test-optimization label Jul 2, 2026

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/vitest-main.js

fix(vitest): refresh no-worker request error tags

baec21e

juan-fernandez marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2026 15:18

juan-fernandez requested review from a team as code owners July 2, 2026 15:18

juan-fernandez requested review from bojbrook and removed request for a team July 2, 2026 15:18

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot reviewed Jul 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

calvinbayer approved these changes Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

juan-fernandez merged commit 615ae32 into master Jul 3, 2026
653 of 654 checks passed

juan-fernandez deleted the juan-fernandez/vitest-no-worker-request-error-tags branch July 3, 2026 08:28

dd-octo-sts Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2026

fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags (#9189)

ab9f822

dd-octo-sts Bot mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2026

v6.0.1 proposal #9207

Closed

dd-octo-sts Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2026

fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags (#9189)

35b9c82

This was referenced Jul 6, 2026

v5.111.1 proposal #9208

Closed

v6.1.0 proposal #9220

Merged

v5.112.0 proposal #9221

Merged

juan-fernandez added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026

fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags (#9189)

c17b7b4

juan-fernandez added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026

fix(vitest): propagate no-worker request error tags (#9189)

f799f3c

davidxia mentioned this pull request Jul 8, 2026

[BUG]: dd-trace 6.1.0 intermittently breaks Vitest tests under @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers with ByteString header error #9259

Closed

Uh oh!

Conversation

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Overall package size

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Unstable benchmarks

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

scenario:appsec-control-20

scenario:appsec-control-24

scenario:appsec-control-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

scenario:log-with-debug-20

scenario:plugin-couchbase-upsert-24

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-and-collapse-off-20

scenario:plugin-graphql-long-with-depth-off-20

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 • edited by datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

juan-fernandez commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Jul 2, 2026 •

edited by datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot

Loading