fix(vitest): route thread workers through main process by juan-fernandez · Pull Request #9169 · DataDog/dd-trace-js

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-01T09:34:17Z

What does this PR do?

Routes Vitest thread-pool workers through the Test Optimization test-worker exporter so they report back to the Vitest main process instead of reporting directly to the intake or Datadog Agent.

This updates the legacy Tinypool instrumentation to mark Vitest worker environments before eager workers are spawned, adds a Vitest worker MessagePort path for legacy thread workers, and tightens Vitest integration coverage so both forks and threads must be reported as framework worker events.

Motivation

Vitest forks workers already used ci-visibility/exporters/test-worker, and Vitest 4 thread workers behaved correctly. Older Vitest thread workers did not get a worker-identifying environment marker, so dd-trace/ci/init selected the normal exporter and those workers reported directly.

The root cause is that legacy Tinypool thread workers do not expose TINYPOOL_WORKER_ID in process.env, and Vitest 1.x/2.x do not export the Vitest class from the CLI chunk where our runFiles wrapper attaches. Marking the Tinypool worker options before construction gives all supported Vitest worker pools the same reporting behavior.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-07-01T09:35:11Z

Overall package size

Self size: 6.43 MB
Deduped: 7.5 MB
No deduping: 7.5 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 3.2.0 | 104.26 kB | 843.44 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.11 | 25.74 kB | 25.74 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

datadog-prod-us1-6 · 2026-07-01T09:38:21Z

✨ Fix all issues with BitsAI

⚠️ Warnings

🧪 1 Test failed in 1 job

Test Optimization | integration-playwright
All test failures are known flaky — job may pass on retry.
❄️ Known flaky: playwright@latest final status tag sets final_status tag only on last ATR retry when EFD is enabled but not active and ATR is active from integration-tests/playwright/playwright-final-status.spec.js
Expected 1 &gt; 1
Not introduced in this PR.

ℹ️ Info

No other issues found (see more)

❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 73.08%
• Overall Coverage: 88.02% (-0.03%)

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 00b50d9 | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

pr-commenter · 2026-07-01T09:50:24Z

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-07-01 10:27:33

Comparing candidate commit 00b50d9 in PR branch juan-fernandez/vitest-worker-exporter-threads with baseline commit 038b5ba in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 2249 metrics, 37 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

unstable execution_time [-179.761ms; +188.939ms] or [-6.832%; +7.181%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

unstable execution_time [-204.373ms; +209.972ms] or [-8.110%; +8.332%]

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

unstable execution_time [-155.861ms; +159.007ms] or [-5.410%; +5.519%]

scenario:appsec-control-20

unstable execution_time [-163.310ms; +148.298ms] or [-9.351%; +8.491%]

scenario:appsec-control-24

unstable execution_time [-102373.255µs; +103081.521µs] or [-8.444%; +8.502%]

scenario:appsec-control-26

unstable execution_time [-112070.687µs; +113549.687µs] or [-9.290%; +9.413%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-2623.792ms; +3739.291ms] or [-29.115%; +41.493%]
unstable execution_time [-2674.314ms; +3823.530ms] or [-27.508%; +39.328%]
unstable instructions [-22.1G instructions; +31.9G instructions] or [-29.890%; +43.229%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-9.272MB; +13.490MB] or [-5.711%; +8.310%]
unstable throughput [-1119.183op/s; +793.297op/s] or [-31.878%; +22.596%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2.131s; +4.607s] or [-21.315%; +46.075%]
unstable execution_time [-2.185s; +4.672s] or [-20.427%; +43.674%]
unstable instructions [-18.8G instructions; +41.1G instructions] or [-22.568%; +49.275%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-7.778MB; +14.445MB] or [-4.833%; +8.976%]
unstable throughput [-1012.519op/s; +473.446op/s] or [-32.376%; +15.139%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2957.753ms; +2980.052ms] or [-29.783%; +30.007%]
unstable execution_time [-3012.373ms; +3023.765ms] or [-28.390%; +28.498%]
unstable instructions [-26206.1M instructions; +26077.1M instructions] or [-31.552%; +31.397%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-8239.860KB; +8295.860KB] or [-5.103%; +5.138%]
unstable throughput [-662.333op/s; +665.751op/s] or [-20.969%; +21.077%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

unstable cpu_user_time [-1712.989ms; +558.017ms] or [-21.583%; +7.031%]
unstable execution_time [-1731.842ms; +561.605ms] or [-20.107%; +6.520%]
unstable instructions [-14.6G instructions; +4.7G instructions] or [-22.615%; +7.291%]
unstable throughput [-164.506op/s; +505.821op/s] or [-4.287%; +13.182%]

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

unstable cpu_user_time [-2.169s; +4.455s] or [-21.519%; +44.202%]
unstable execution_time [-2.176s; +4.485s] or [-20.192%; +41.621%]
unstable instructions [-19.4G instructions; +40.2G instructions] or [-23.101%; +47.759%]
unstable max_rss_usage [-6.625MB; +14.492MB] or [-4.125%; +9.023%]
unstable throughput [-965.016op/s; +480.485op/s] or [-31.200%; +15.535%]

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

unstable cpu_user_time [-334.191ms; +403.610ms] or [-6.785%; +8.195%]
unstable execution_time [-334.401ms; +401.506ms] or [-6.694%; +8.037%]
unstable throughput [-137963.734op/s; +116033.521op/s] or [-8.200%; +6.897%]

scenario:sampling-rate-limited-20

unstable cpu_user_time [-69.045ms; +97.077ms] or [-4.869%; +6.845%]
unstable execution_time [-68.912ms; +97.362ms] or [-4.850%; +6.852%]

scenario:spans-finish-later-26

unstable max_rss_usage [-5.759MB; +9.245MB] or [-3.906%; +6.272%]

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

unstable max_rss_usage [-3.370MB; +7.128MB] or [-4.241%; +8.970%]

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d1d375adc8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

codecov · 2026-07-01T09:52:21Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.46154% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.72%. Comparing base (038b5ba) to head (00b50d9).
⚠️ Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/vitest.js	88.23%	8 Missing ⚠️
.../src/ci-visibility/exporters/test-worker/writer.js	90.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #9169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.73%   93.72%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         892      892              
  Lines       51236    51311      +75     
  Branches    11924    11945      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits        48026    48089      +63     
- Misses       3210     3222      +12

Flag	Coverage Δ
aiguard	`34.87% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
aiguard-integration	`41.79% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
apm-bucket-0	`34.84% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-1	`40.33% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-bucket-2	`37.34% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-capabilities-tracing	`48.68% <90.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
apm-integrations-aerospike	`33.12% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-confluentinc-kafka-javascript	`40.02% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-couchbase	`33.24% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-http	`41.95% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-kafkajs	`40.26% <ø> (-0.12%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-next	`29.50% <ø> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-prisma	`35.03% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
apm-integrations-tedious	`33.89% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
appsec	`57.70% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
appsec-express_fastify_graphql	`53.67% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-integration	`36.18% <5.88%> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
appsec-kafka_ldapjs_lodash	`43.58% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
appsec-mongodb-core_mongoose_mysql	`48.74% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-next	`28.00% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
appsec-node-serialize_passport_postgres	`47.91% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
appsec-sourcing_stripe_template	`45.47% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
debugger	`44.37% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-0	`28.15% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-1	`37.40% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-10	`40.35% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-11	`27.95% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-12	`28.67% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-13	`27.78% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-2	`30.23% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-3	`35.90% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-4	`28.56% <ø> (+0.42%)`	⬆️
instrumentations-bucket-5	`36.28% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-6	`38.25% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-7	`36.01% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-8	`36.95% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-bucket-9	`39.45% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-instrumentation-couchbase	`46.48% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
instrumentations-integration-esbuild	`24.88% <5.88%> (+0.02%)`	⬆️
llmobs-ai_anthropic_bedrock	`39.53% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
llmobs-google-genai_langchain_vertex-ai	`36.97% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
llmobs-openai	`39.58% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
llmobs-sdk	`43.59% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
master-coverage	`93.72% <88.46%> (?)`
openfeature	`37.76% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
openfeature-unit	`50.39% <ø> (ø)`
platform-core_esbuild_instrumentations-misc	`23.33% <5.88%> (-0.03%)`	⬇️
platform-integration	`47.42% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
platform-shimmer_unit-guardrails_webpack	`18.88% <5.88%> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-0	`36.37% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-1	`39.60% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
plugins-bucket-11	`38.46% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-17	`39.15% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-18	`42.01% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-19	`39.56% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-20	`43.25% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bucket-4	`37.71% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-bullmq_cassandra_cookie	`39.76% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-cookie-parser_crypto_dd-trace-api	`33.22% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-fetch_fs_generic-pool	`36.05% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-google-cloud-pubsub_grpc_handlebars	`43.11% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
plugins-hapi_hono_ioredis	`37.78% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-jest_knex_langgraph	`32.60% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-ldapjs_light-my-request_limitd-client	`27.91% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-lodash_mariadb_memcached	`35.11% <ø> (-0.14%)`	⬇️
plugins-mongodb_mongodb-core_mongoose	`36.31% <ø> (-0.09%)`	⬇️
plugins-multer_mysql_mysql2	`35.14% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-nats_node-serialize_opensearch	`37.14% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
plugins-passport-http_pino_postgres	`35.53% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-process_pug_redis	`34.26% <ø> (-0.08%)`	⬇️
plugins-undici_url_valkey	`35.88% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
plugins-vm_winston_ws	`37.55% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
profiling	`43.62% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-aws-sdk	`33.29% <ø> (-0.06%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-bedrockruntime	`32.16% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-client	`37.16% <ø> (-0.05%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-dynamodb	`34.09% <ø> (-0.12%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-eventbridge	`27.25% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-kinesis	`37.40% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-lambda	`34.59% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-s3	`32.59% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-serverless-peer-service	`39.56% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
serverless-aws-sdk-sns	`38.25% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-sqs	`38.00% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-stepfunctions	`33.18% <ø> (-0.07%)`	⬇️
serverless-aws-sdk-util	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
serverless-bucket-0	`39.46% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
serverless-lambda	`34.33% <ø> (-0.09%)`	⬇️
test-optimization-cucumber	`52.30% <ø> (+0.11%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-cypress	`49.41% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
test-optimization-jest	`55.37% <50.00%> (+0.10%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-mocha	`53.38% <50.00%> (+0.07%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-atr	`43.33% <50.00%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-efd	`43.61% <50.00%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-final-status	`43.96% <50.00%> (+0.32%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-impacted-tests	`43.16% <50.00%> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-reporting	`43.26% <50.00%> (+0.09%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-management	`44.82% <50.00%> (+0.19%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-playwright-playwright-test-span	`44.51% <50.00%> (+0.08%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-selenium	`45.26% <0.00%> (+0.04%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-testopt	`47.99% <23.07%> (+0.04%)`	⬆️
test-optimization-vitest	`50.69% <83.33%> (+0.14%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

datadog-prod-us1-6

More details

The getWrappedOn refactor is the most load-bearing correctness decision in this PR: the new global MessagePort.prototype.on wrapping (wrapMessagePortOn) would have swallowed ALL of Vitest's own array messages on any MessagePort if the old "always return for arrays" logic had been kept — the selective handleWorkerReport-based early return is what makes the global wrap safe.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{📊 Validated against 41 scenarios · Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit d1d375a · What is Autotest? · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

juan-fernandez · 2026-07-01T10:13:53Z

@codex review

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-07-01T10:22:13Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: 00b50d9685

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

fix(vitest): route thread workers through main process

d1d375a

github-actions Bot added the semver-patch label Jul 1, 2026

juan-fernandez added the test-optimization label Jul 1, 2026

juan-fernandez marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2026 09:43

juan-fernandez requested a review from a team as a code owner July 1, 2026 09:43

juan-fernandez enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2026 09:44

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread packages/datadog-instrumentations/src/vitest.js Outdated

juan-fernandez disabled auto-merge July 1, 2026 09:54

juan-fernandez mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2026

refactor(vitest): split main and worker instrumentation #9170

Merged

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot reviewed Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

anmarchenko previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

fix(vitest): restrict tinypool worker marking

00b50d9

juan-fernandez dismissed anmarchenko’s stale review via 00b50d9 July 1, 2026 10:10

anmarchenko approved these changes Jul 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

juan-fernandez enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2026 10:25

juan-fernandez merged commit dd01d58 into master Jul 1, 2026
804 of 805 checks passed

juan-fernandez deleted the juan-fernandez/vitest-worker-exporter-threads branch July 1, 2026 10:30

dd-octo-sts Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2026

fix(vitest): route thread workers through main process (#9169)

37da147

This was referenced Jul 2, 2026

v5.111.0 proposal #9150

Merged

v6.0.0 proposal #9195

Merged

rochdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2026

fix(vitest): route thread workers through main process (#9169)

a8b12e7

rochdev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2026

fix(vitest): route thread workers through main process (#9169)

32728e2

Uh oh!

Conversation

juan-fernandez commented Jul 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Overall package size

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 • edited by datadog-official Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Warnings

ℹ️ Info

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Unstable benchmarks

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-24

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-26

scenario:appsec-appsec-enabled-with-attacks-26

scenario:appsec-control-20

scenario:appsec-control-24

scenario:appsec-control-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-default-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-with-snapshot-minimal-26

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-24

scenario:debugger-line-probe-without-snapshot-26

scenario:dogstatsd-with-tags-20

scenario:sampling-rate-limited-20

scenario:spans-finish-later-26

scenario:test-optimization-large-suite-20

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

juan-fernandez commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

juan-fernandez commented Jul 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

datadog-prod-us1-6 Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 •

edited by datadog-official Bot

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading